Liberals Push for Anti-Hate Speech Legislation that They Will Define

Whoever controls the language controls the debate. Whoever controls the debate controls the laws. Whoever controls the laws controls the people.

Defining and redefining words are important to move along new social, cultural, and political trends for the purpose of empowerment. Liberals have a long history of picking the right words to make pig slop look like a masterpiece. In fact, a liberal “artist” can slop some dung on a painting or piss in a jar and command large sums of money because it’s art, and no liberal wants to be found disagreeing with the intelligentsia on the matter.

Lewis Carroll had some insights:

"I don't know what you mean by 'glory,'" Alice said.

Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. "Of course you don't — till I tell you . . . . When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less."

"The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things."

"The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master — that's all."

It couldn’t be said any better. None of the following designations actually define the ideology behind the names: Gay Rights, Pro-Choice, Progressives, Affordable Care Act, Social Security, Dreamers.

So when we hear that some liberals (another word that does not mean what it originally meant) want to pass legislation that would outlaw “hate speech,” we know that we are headed for treacherous territory where the goal is control.

Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz has called attempts to define “hate speech” a “dangerous trend.”

“I have never in my life seen a successful effort to define hate speech that does not interfere with rights of free expression. It is a worthy effort, but my prediction is that it either leads to the conclusion government cannot do it, or that they will do it and that will infringe on First Amendment rights.

“Governments are trying to also make changes to hate speech law and debating the issue in Canada, at the United Nations, and even right now in Israel. It is a worldwide trend, but it is a really dangerous trend.”

Consider that any time a policy of President Obama’s is opposed, it’s because of racism. This is no exaggeration. It’s such a common accusation that it’s become a joke. But it’s not a joke for liberals. The only way they can maintain political power is through redefinition.

Just holding an opinion and speaking out against same-sex anything can get a person fired or fined.

Look what happened to the CEO of Mozilla because he donated to Proposition 8. Then there are the brothers who lost their show on the HGTV Network because of their views on homosexuality and abortion. "Twin brothers Jason and David Benham were scheduled to appear on 'Flip It Forward,' a renovation show that was set to feature them helping families make improvements to their homes. But when some left-leaning media outlets began digging into their backgrounds and personal perspectives, everything changed."

Hate speech legislation could very well be used to prosecute the Benham brothers for their outspoken views.

The insanity is spreading:

“A newspaper editor in Iowa has been fired for opining on his personal blog that the Queen James Bible is an attempt by homosexuals ‘to make their sinful nature “right with God.”’”

These are private companies. But once the government gets involved, punitive action of the worst kind is inevitable, especially since the hate-crimes monitors will be the ones to write the regulations.

One person’s hate speech is another person’s freedom to speak. The last thing any of us should ever want is to allow the State to define what they contend is proper speech and what isn’t.

“While Dershowitz believes there is greater freedom of speech today, he noted people tend to be more easily offended and more likely to call for a solution for that offense, which can set a dangerous precedent.
“‘There is an “-ism” for everything — racism, sexism, fatism — and once you give in to one -ism, every other -ism comes back and asks to be treated the same, too. It can be dangerous to satisfy people's sensitivities.’”

And once the door is open, it can never be shut.



  • gvette

    I'm sorry. I know it's wrong, but they need to put a season on liberals.

    • James A. DeHart

      January 1st through December 31st .... longest hunting season for any animal!

      • gvette

        James, will that be country wide?

    • freedixie

      I'm in. Is there a limit?

      • gvette

        LOL...funny you came back with that. In a different place I had mentioned something like this, and I received a lot of answers from people in Texas. They are waiting to find out what the limit is.

        Enjoy your day!

      • grammy23

        Only when they're an endangered species because we have to keep a few around just for chuckles.

    • william

      Don't be sorry because the liberals should do this world a favor and hang themselves. All liberals will go to hell for being a servant of satan.

      • gvette

        reason I say that is, I know it's wrong to kill, William. In this day, and time
        I'm beginning to feel the only way to save our country, and sanity, is to rid
        ourselves of people that want to destroy our way of life.

    • rosemarienoa

      Would that include a bounty ??? If so I'm in !!!

      • gvette you know, they're not worth much. Thanks for the chuckle!

    • James Cooke

      Best weapon? Humor. Laugh the pitiful, pathetic little hand-wringers down! Works like a charm! Try it, just to experiment, and you'll be amazed at the results. 'Course you'll earn their undying hatred, but its fun.

  • USMC 64-68

    Hate speech is a bogus construct. It is a commie one as well, created to enable the enforcement of conformity to a totalitarian government. It will (actually, already is), the catalyst that will approve tyranny.

  • disqus_C6fGXmCFNc

    They need to cut all the liberals hands off and tongues out, they are so evil it is just getting to the point they all need to go to jail.

  • pilgrimsjog

    Like Muslims, Progressive liberals have their own version of Sharia Law. God in Christ tolerates those who choose to not believe in Him. Muslims and Progressive liberals. seeking to replace God with themselves, cannot show tolerance for any other belief-system.

    They want to stamp out a tolerant God and replace God with intolerant man.

    • tionico

      a god made in their own image.... exactly backwards.

  • FletchGuy

    The good thing about it would be that all liberals wouldnt be able to speak anymore since all they preach is hate. All of their ideas involve hate to others.

    • pilgrimsjog

      The problem with this is that Progressive liberals will define hate speech as any statement that opposes, or even questions, their ideology! The speaker will be bullied into silence, off the job, out of their home, out of their schools, etc.

  • carlton goodson

    If I don't like what you do and I say something about it that's hate speech?

    • James Cooke

      Yep! Because what you say offends me! And, (here's the neat little wrinkle in the Fascists' tactics) I don't have to define "offend". Or if I really want to intimidate you, I'll just declare that that "all right-thinking people would not do that, think that, say that and create a hostile social environment."
      It's all a control issue, by control freaks, who can't control their own lives.

  • freedixie

    Anything that is contrary to what spews out of their hate-filled mouths is what they call "hate speech". Tolerance is a one-way street with them. They speak of tolerance, but ONLY if it is in line with their twisted, sick view of the subject. THEY (libturds) have no tolerance for facts or opposing viewpoints.

  • yennikcm work..

  • USARetired

    Calling liberals @ssholes will never be restricted in this house!

  • Mamatex

    In one way, the very attempt should be laughable but in the world today, it is becoming a reality and regardless if you are a Democrat or a Republican, this is a fundamental change we should never allow.

  • ReidDA

    I don't see any push, I am dissapoint

  • DrSique

    I have an idea. Let's have the Southern Poverty Law Center decide what is or is not hate speech. Yeah, that's the ticket. How about this for hate speech. I effin hate effin leftists..............with an effin passion.

    • rosemarienoa

      Me too !!! They are insane !!!

  • glock 19 fan

    There is an old proverb that goes: "He who tries to please everybody pleases nobody."

  • MrsCleaver

    Wake me when the armed revolution starts!!!!!!

  • jerry1944

    I dont even think there should be a thing called hate crime. But what ever happened to freedom of speack some of us fought for

  • Ken S

    this is just to try and silence conservatives ,this is designed to do as the LGBT are currently doing to Christians or anyone that they chose to oppose .

    • Shane

      Exactly, hate speech laws are used by liberals to protect their precious voting blocks from legitimate criticism. These laws are meant to protect Muslims, women, gays, blacks, and Hispanics from any criticism, whether it is legitimate or not. Hate speech laws infringe on our right to freedom of speech, and therefore, they are unconstitutional.

      • Me_in_Canada_eh

        What's going to protct gays from muslims? They stone gay people to death in the middle east.

        • grammy23

          Ask Obama, he should know. I've also seen pictures of a gay tied down and given 100 lashes with a whip. Liberals can say all they want about conservatives being hateful but although I disagree with their lifestyle I sure as heck would never wish that upon anybody.

        • tionico

          their own strength and cunning.. er, wait, they generally don't have much, do they? Uhm.. maybe fear that the mozzies will come after them, driving them back into the closet? They will eventually not breed themselves out of existence. Mostly.

  • MrsCleaver

    The only good thing about liberals is eventually they die.

    • rosemarienoa

      Just not soon enough !!!

    • wabby99

      Yeah but there seems to be 10 new ones for every 1 that dies.

      • Me_in_Canada_eh

        Like weeds.

      • tionico

        can't be true.. they favour the "right" of their women to kill their unborn, and imprison any of us who say they should not. Given a bit of time, WE will increase, THEY will decrease. We must simply outbreed them, THEN teach our own children to uphold God's laws and standards. Which would include multiplying..... like weeds. Deliberatekyt "turning off the spigot" delibeerately telling God WE know better than He knows about how many children we should have is part of how we got here. And part of the cure.

    • wildeagleone

      And there are none that will be missed by we the Americans that place them in society, lower then Whale Shi+++

  • Jim

    Perhaps it might help if someone referred them to the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States - you know - that founding document that all of them took a sworn oath to uphold and defend. Of course it is very difficult for them to interpret, since it doesn't fit any of their Communist, Socialist, Liberal, or Progressive ideologies. May some other form of getting their attention would work? Kick their crooked butts out of the government!

  • wabby99

    This is Hitler's Germany all over again. They will define and prohibit "HATE" speech today and what else won't we be able to say every year moving forward. PEOPLE please wake up and see what is happening. There is only one kind of speech and that is FREE speech as defined by our Constitution. They start out with the type of speech they can get away with trying to stop. Oh we have to stop people from being mean and of course no one wants to say it is ok to be mean. Well guess what folks it is OK to say mean things. Remember sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me........well then pull up your big girl and big boy panties and deal with it. They could care less if you say mean things about other people. They are using it as the linchpin to prohibit speech against the government and whatever else they deem they don't want you to talk about. Again, people this is COMMUNISM. Turn off the TV and read some history.

  • Jr1776

    kiss my butt, does that qualify ?

  • C K Johnson

    Lets see Obama,Kerry,Holder, are masters at hate speech. This makes me sick to read another thing taken away. There is going to be a war of all wars. There are between 100 a 150 well armed men in the United States. That are mad at this DICTATORSHIP that is going on now in our country. If Obama finishes his term we are domed. He must be IMPEACHED and removed from office. Or there will be millions of lives lost in the battle. God Bless the American People.

  • Seldena

    We have Free Speech rights under our Constitution. Who do these liberal dems think they are--KINGS???? They have all lost their minds! This is America a FREE country not a communist country!

  • Fact_Mastermind

    Do these politicians understand.

    First Amendment : Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

    • Mike Laborde

      Freedom of religion, not freedom from religion.

  • Bill

    BS Liberals, you will NEVER control me! " Live Free or Die!"

  • wildeagleone

    I have one thing to say to the DeMONcrat party as a whole and that isgo to helll and don't expect to collect $200. You folks cannot reguate our speech and will not because there are a hell of a lot more of us then there are of you and we will have the courts so full of stupidity trying to figure out exactly what we meant by what you may consider "hate speech" that the wheels of Justice, ( and that is a joke any more ) will come to a complete stop

  • Johnny

    Will this stop liberal attacks against republicans, tea party members?? Since I consider their lies, and attacks toward other parties as hate speech. So if liberals want to pursue Hate Speech legislation then they shouldn't mind their verbal abuse; lies, and verbal attacks as hate speech! I know they want go for that because lately that's all they have done is lie, slander, and attack other party members, including Citizens. So if they want that legislation then the other parties should added in that also as hate speech!! But I also believe it should be illegal for politicians to lie to their citizens, or attack the citizens. I know Harry Reid, and his comrades want go for that because that's all he has done over the last 16 years.

    • grammy23

      How about when we take over the Senate and win the presidency in 2016 we make it an automatic fine of say $10,000 to call a U.S. citizen a Domestic Terrorist without the documentation to back it up in court. Or if one is heard so much as whispering "allah Akbar" (or however you spell that) they are immediately imprisoned. How about that demwits? How about we do it by Executive Order? Or maybe Liberals just need to get a little thicker skin, after all, half of what I say on these sites is to get under their skin because they're so funny when they get heated-up.

      • Johnny

        Liberals will still lie, spread hate, spread racism, ect... It is in their Nature. You know the saying if you don't have a plat form to run on, you attack, smear, and lie or do just about anything if you are a Liberal or just plain old Democrat. I can say that because at one time I was a democrat. I was young and didn't know any better. But I am not happy with some of the Republicans at this time either. Some have lost their way, I guess being in Washington D.C. to long must have a liberal effect on them. They seem to forget why they are their, and who they represent, and who sent them to Washington. They become part of big Government, and that is not what the founding fathers intended!

      • Truth Preacher

        We need to BULLDOZE every Mosque and deport all these traitors who have come here to conquer us. Simple

        • Marie W

          I agree. Thank you.

  • suckcnn

    'Craps are racist ba$tards

  • jarnkm

    Our Constitutional 'freedom of speech' is being limited every time I turn around. The idiotic idea that "It is criminal" to say anything derogatory about Obama or Islam/Islamists is getting a bit out of hand. IF the statement is indeed proven true and could be considered 'common knowledge' should negate this charge. Considering that America was once considered a 'Christian Nation', before we turned our backs on God and built Sodom & Gomorrah II, the Islamic faith and guidelines clearly shows that it is almost totally opposite of the Christian faith. It cannot be a "crime" IF it is a true statement, or should not be, anyway

  • Mike Laborde

    Liberals believe that if they say something "is" hate speech and says it first that they have the high ground and are "absolutely" correct and their word must be heeded, whereas a conservative may have a belief and speak against a certain thing , they have lost already since liberals said that it is hate speech. Decent in a liberals mind makes them kings of the hills on every ground just because they say that they are on the lookout for the "little guy" so, they must be correct in their thinking.
    This kind of thinking causes the loss of free speech. But liberals will spin everything that they don't agree with and bring it to a court that will rule in their favor by "also" changing the meaning of words. Just like Bill Clinton tried to do when he said " It all depends on what the meaning of it is".

  • tom nogaro

    in the animal kingdom, the physical realm governed by force or might, the rule is: eat or be eaten.

    to paraphrase reknowned american psychiatrist, thomas szasz, in the human kingdom, a social realm governed by words, the rule is: "self-define, or be defined". "othello", where a great military man of the physical realm of force, was conned and thus destroyed by iago, a word gamester in the societal realm, artfully portrays this.

    if one is limited in his lawful speech (deliberately excluding "fire!!" type speech in a theater), ie, if one may no longer peaceably (even if hatefully) define himself, he is now defined by the other (opponent, state, world). now, as a consequence, he is an imprisoned slave, owned and defined by the defining entity. charlatan rhetoricians know and practice this shameful technique well in their sham discourse, knowing their ideas lack force.

    you see this technique employed by trolls here a lot. if their masters legislate this intellectually violent and dishonest technique, they will shred our first amendment, and you will now "live" in their mind box, and there only, or else you will be forced to hide (not live), as in any other totalitarian state.

    btw, not for nuttin: the portuguese verb for "lie" is mentira (mental, mendacity). mentation is mind activity; speech is the natural expression of that activity. divested of this, you will be forced to be either a liar to self (hiding), or the state's mind possession: bound prostrate in its lie (coffin) built just for you.

    any legislator pushing, supporting, or voting for such totalitarianism must be removed. no if's, and's, or but's about it. either they go, or we with our freedom go, but someone must go.

  • Mys77

    Perhaps the solution is to make dems and liberals deaf, we already know they are dumb! Or perhaps make everyone mute? Yeah, pretty absurd! All I know is the quickest way to make people more hateful and angry, is repressing their right to express and state their viewpoint.

  • victorbarney

    I bet this legislation outlaws all religious belief in America, other than Islam, and Marxism, both having a covenant with DEATH! Watch...

  • Casey Dial

    Here, let me save some time and define hate speech for the liberals. "Anything that a conservative says is hate speech." Anything that a liberal says is okay.

    • curmudgeon

      LOL! You hit that one out of the park!

  • TAM44

    Liberalism is hate and also a disease.

  • foxxybey

    There goes the 1st amendment? If I say I hate ice cream, can ice cream sue me or put me in jail, LOL, this take over of our rights is real hate speech and anyone who signs on to this is a Nazi left wing nut job and needs to be out of office, if Obozo uses his pen, someone needs to cut of his left hand as it is a hateful hand.

  • ezekiel22

    So called liberals scream for the beauty of diversity and the celebration thereof. Has anybody noticed that when one does practice real diversity liberals cry? What liberals really want is not diversity they want homogeny. The only opinion they want is the opinion they give you.

  • 1947rhoda64

    The Liberals are the ones spewing hate, but they are trying to stop us from telling the truth. These idiots need to get their acts together and stop these evil corrupt hate speech they are doing. America stand up and stop these idiots from trying to take over our lives.

    • Keith McPhee

      You may not of heard this, but 'The Truth Is Now Hate Speech' It'd sure be nice if all those idiots would pack their bags and leave OUR country never to return again.

      • Dlbnfla

        There is no place that would have them.. If they tried to press their liberal/ socialist crap anywhere else in the world they would be jailed, or beheaded.

  • ActualConundrum

    They want to end free speech like the muslims. Next comes death penalty fot incorrect speech. The liberal terrorist have to be stopped. Today they are the only ones doing the hate speech and already calling for death of non liberal people and their children.

    • Truth Preacher

      They are the ones who will die, and then burn in Hell for ever and ever and ever. Liberals are children of Hell

      • ActualConundrum

        Major democrat organization was supporting nigerian islamic terrorist, the ones who just kidnapped hundreds of school children to sell into slavery. Evil indeed.

        "Just two hours after WND reported still had an active petition calling on the U.S. government not to designate the jihadist group Boko Haram a terrorist organization, the leftist website suddenly removed the petition.

        Boko Haram is the very same group that has enraged the world by kidnapping more than 200 schoolgirls in Nigeria and threatening to sell them into slavery.

        The petition – which received its first signature on June 20, 2012, and continued to be signed at the time of this report – was uncovered by Rep. Steve Stockman, R-Texas, who asked to apologize for hosting an online petition opposing a terrorist designation for Boko Haram.

        The page where the petition had been for two years now says “Petition Not Available. The content of this petition is under review.”

        Before it was yanked, the petition had well more than 100 signatures, with more than a dozen people signing it just on Friday."

        • Marie W

          Thank you for reporting this story here. I am on my tiny phone keyboard today. It is so horrible that liberals will let this go... except for the demand of their accountability it would still be upon that publicly accessible, basically American website. I am sure it is the tip of the iceberg we don't yet see.... all the awful things liberals support in the name of freedom. It is ludicrous.

        • ActualConundrum

          Yes I am sure without it being made public they would continue. Even after the kidnapping which has been in the public knowledge. Still did not move them to stop. Only after their fight was revealed did they shamfully stop that terrorist support.

  • A concerned american

    Harry Reid, Pelosi, Obama are the three major hate spewing venomous people in Washington DC. They are always coming up with a derogatory term for the Republicans-I recollect Harry Reid said the other day that Republicans are like slippery pigs when the Senate is trying to deal with them. No, we don't need legislation on their so-called hate speech, we need more courtesy and agreeable people-no in-fighting.

    • curmudgeon

      You omitted Obama (Both), Holder, Sharpton, Jackson, Rev. Wright, Calypso Louie Farrakhan and the entire bunch of affirmative action people who constitute the CBC!

  • wolfman4u

    it is my right to hate anything I don't like including speech and if you don't like it go kiss a frog

  • monacall

    All I will say is I have enough ammo to get myself killed. Smart ones will read between the lines. In other words "come and take it". Sobs.

  • ABBAsFernando

    This is not America. This is NAZI Germany!

    • Marilyn

      It will be going that way, if we do not smarten up.

      • ABBAsFernando

        We have lost low information individuals to the Communist Party USA. They are so brainwashed they believe anything they are told to believe. A perfect example is the Benghazi scandal.

        It is called SOVIET DISINFORMATION the science of FRAMING individuals and groups. Mainstream media in America has used this to frame Viet Nam Veterans and loyal American citizens.

  • Abinadi

    Well sounds like freedom of speech is at risk. Of course the Liberals want us to be forced to stop saying it like it is. Then they can not do their jobs and when people die
    because of their inactivity. We cannot complain or suffer if we do. So Benghazi can
    repeat it's self and we would not be able to complain, Wow. What is happening to our wonderful country? Where have our freedoms gone?

    • Marie W

      I wish Mitt and Ann were in the White House.

      • Marilyn

        Me, too

  • a marine .

    I hate demoncrats because they are out to impose a nazi style government in AMERICA.
    I hate liberals because they are morons.
    I hate muslimes because they are evil blood thirsty animals.
    I hate all the people in dc that are guilty of treason.
    Its my right and no one can take it away by any BS law,
    Now I know demoncrats and muslimes and liberals and all those guilty of treason also hate me, thats the way it works in the world.
    When the SHTF we will see who comes on top its that simple.
    if you dont like what I say dont read it or listen to me if you hear my voice,

  • Bannorhill

    Liberals hate the first and second amendments.

  • jime1

    Here is an idea. Let's all just decide we all hate each other, you know declare we're all equal opportunity bigots. You hate me, I hate you, they hate us, we hate them, we're all equal again, problem solved! Next make believe problem, or non issue !!!

  • BGills

    I don't believe I've heard a more concise analysis of the pathology of Liberalism!
    Any such legislation will obviously contain huge carve-outs exempting Liberal motivated "criticisms," defining them as being somehow justified by their mere nature. Only Conservatives can be guilty of the new hate-speech, much as only whites can be guilty of racism. No matter how false the narrative, this will certainly be the intent of any such legislation, regardless of any claims to the contrary.

  • MC

    A definition of "Liberalism" is NOT having liberty. A Liberal Progressive is actually a "Regressive" person . They believe anything that stifles liberty & freedom. They would like us to revert back to the 17th century feudal system. They want to be in control of the masses as our rulers. The same scenario Obama envisions as our ruler emperor. They forget their history of tyrants in 18th century France.

    • wvstarktruth

      They live with the illusion that they will remain among the few who rule the rest but most will wind up living under the bus.

  • profchuck

    There is a reason why the law, medicine and in many cases the church chose Latin as the language of expression. It is a dead language and as such it does not change. Latin is immune to political or theological whim so it can be relied upon to retain meaning even in the presence of sociological flux or ideological conflict. Politicians know all too well how to manipulate language in order to create the illusion of understanding. It is the tool of choice of the huxter, the politician, and the tyrant.

  • wisdomcries

    "new speech" is not new

    PC speech was defined by Lucas which eventually became Marxist Cultural speech.

    They do own the language, hence they do own the debates.

    Please educate yourself so that your children will also know

  • DOOM161

    I guarantee that labeling conservatives as domestic terrorists won't meet their definition.

  • colsooonscoorner

    If you're conservative open your mouth and they'll say it's hate speech. Never mind that no lib ever tells the truth, except behind closed doors. As that basketball team owner did. The libs speak the words their constituents want to hear. While all the while working against the very people they purport to be helping. Simply said their in in for they own glory and advancement. Nobody else counts.,

  • Thessalonianguy

    Time to start calling congressman/women about this nonsense and tell them to kill this bill in committee.

  • pysco

    The biggest violators, are the very ones, that are pushing the bill..........of course they want to be the monitors to pick and choose what is hate speech.. I think that calling someone a racist is hate speech, something they do everyday, including the president.

  • Marie W

    "...people tend to be more easily offended and more likely to call for a solution for that offense, which can set a dangerous precedent.“ A simple but profound truth. I find myself on both sides of this ... but it is just one of the many facets of similar issues from those similar sources. I think its come to the fore because so many people can be vocal. There is a corresponding use by con men around who believe it is their duty to gain control of the conversation. It is a new forum for gathering power so the liberals want it all. So do other groups.

  • Mach 1

    Many of these attitudes and problems are due to Obama. Give this loser/socialist the boot. Send him back from where he came.

  • Truth Preacher

    It is time to remove all traitors in government the way our Founders did and the way they also commanded us to do so.

  • rchguns

    When are people going to learn that hate whether it is spoken or demonstrated is totally relative. What one person or group of people consider to be hate by others it is normal everyday speech. A primary example:

    A American of African dissent is speaking to another person of the same color the use of the N-word is a term of endearment and everyday speech. If a white person does the same thing they are liable to be killed on the spot and then the family will be sued for the trauma cause to the black person. Hate speech and hate crimes can only be perpetrated by certain individuals. Other individuals who happen to be Christians, Jews, Caucasians (Krackers), conservatives, members of the NRA, and the most guilty party of all would be A Heterosexual White Couple, who happen to be like members of the NRA, Believe in Jesus Christ and just happen to be regular churchgoers. These people would be automatically guilty of hate crimes, hate speech and anything and everything else that they can be charged with.

  • Down to Earth Thinking

    Reichstag, politburo and SS all rolled into one , Hey ? PRAVDA will be the overseer.



  • pupster40

    Insanity is the best description of politics in Amerika today. It starts locally and infects the whole system.
    When a foreign government can dictate our way of life, we are no longer represented by our questionably elected idiots.They have become the enemy!

    • gotham1883

      So true. The local gov have been infected with greed instilled by the fed gov ability to create money from nothing.

    • mogul264

      This also holds when a foreign government, masquerading as the 'religion' ISLAM, attempts to force 'Sharia law' onto NON-Muslims! Under the Constitution, it is patently ILLEGAL in the United States for ANYONE to try to enact it !

  • scottymoore

    Why don't we just build a huge prison and have everyone joyfully volunteer to go into it and just not say anything, then we can be retrained in the new language of the smart ones.....
    Oh yea, that's what they are trying to do. These so called anti-violence people are creating a new, strange kind of violence, in their efforts to silence those who disagree.
    The thought police are creeping in the background,

  • zanografix

    Look at how they redefined the term "natural born" in order to make Obama a legitimate candidate. It always was a citizenship thing and every president before Obama had two citizen parents. Those women that were say from Ireland became US citizens when they were married because citizenship went with the father. Now they have so mucked up the definition of the term "father" that natural born could mean whatever they want it to mean.

  • imjmz

    And what is next? Will we have to stop teaching our children Biblical principals because they decide that Gods word is "hate speech"? If they pass any such legislation, it will be, according to their law.

  • James

    We have fought wars against foreign governments that wanted to do this exact same thing to us. Now we have our own stupid ass citizens wanting to convert this country from one of free speech to a Hitler type dictatorship. Hate just means a strong dislike
    and we sure as hell have grounds to hate the Liberals and the homosexuals for
    trying to force upon us what foreign armies could not. Keep your fire arms; you may well need them to fight these people.

  • Shears_of_Atropos

    You can't legislate goodness, only compliance.
    You can't legislate peace, only fear.
    You can't legislate happiness, only apathy.
    You can't legislate agreement, only silence.
    You can't legislate friendship, but:
    The first four are enough to do the job!

  • v steve

    Any speech can be made out to be Hate speech.

    Our liberties are under assault from leftist elites who are intolerant and restrictive of free speech if the message differs from their viewpoints.

    Free speech is often precisely about pissing off other people — challenging social taboos or political values. No tolerance, zero tolerance, offensive are all about being suppressive of free speech.

    When government becomes restrictive of free speech it leads to genocide. What is next, laws for this group of people, laws against that group of people?

    The King of England is back and what are we going to do about it.

  • Down to Earth Thinking

    What this is really about is who gets to define the boundaries our society lives by ?

    I wrote about this in detail about a year ago and it is just as valid today , maybe more so, because people are just now realizing all of these underlying issues? We are in a war of boundaries and liberties? Who gets them and who decides what, how and when ? We have far too many vague "control mechanism " intended laws that can be used as tools to drive agendas.

    We really do live in massive illusions and control mechanisms and this of course is just another one ! Many subjects and thesis you have not seen or heard of or perhaps considered. But down to earth truth and logic , simple as that.

  • gotham1883

    Whenever special liberties or rights are given to one person, they are always taken from another person.

  • Patricia McGehee

    I don't want anything changed by the Democrats. They have followed Obama's Communist views and cannot be trusted to throw out pig slop. I say no to their changes, no just no but H*** NO.

  • Arationofreason

    Shouldn't be too hard to define. Just look at comments under Liberal.

  • mogul264

    And just WHY do I get the feeling this bunch will define 'hate' speech as ANYTHING which can be considered "anti-liberal'? Once, my granddaughter, as a toddler, told Nana, "Papaw said a bad word!" Flabbergasted and a LITTLE upset, Nana asked me what I had said! I answered that I didn't know! When Nana asked her just WHAT bad word Papaw had said to her, she said "Him say NO!" THAT was the 'bad' word.."NO"!

    Is THIS what we can expect from these liberals? Whatever you say, if they don't 'like' it, it's "hate" speech! I just have this "feeling"~!

  • Richard Haley

    Typical! Just TYPICAL!!!

  • Jacobite2

    Dershowitz is lying or ignorant (probably ignorant, not living in America). Speech today is freer for the alien, the abnormal, and the criminal. For ordinary white Christian Americans, it's 100 times worse than under George III. In the early 50s as a kid I was getting a haircut while the grown-ups were discussing the sheriff election coming up. About one candidate the comment was: "Hey, never killed a white man." This was perfectly ordinary (in fact, fairly mild) speech in mid-Century America (excluding un/anti-American enclaves like NYC). Also remember the story about the ladies of DC asking Bess Truman to stop Harry referring to 'nigras'. Bess said: "Good grief, it took me 50 years to get him to say 'nigra'" Hell, anybody who was a kid before 1965 knows what comes after "Eenie, meenie, miney, moe......" for God's sake. I would guess that a very large percentage of normal American speech of 60 years ago would get you fired today (even though attitudes have changed only superficially). This is not freedom. This is tyranny. Worse, it is a tyranny of non-Americans over Americans, in America.

    • gotham1883

      They are Amerikans.

      • Jacobite2

        Find a word less similar to 'American'. This could lead to confusion. I'll keep hyphenated citizens unless something better comes along. Call it a dog-whistle if you like, but we all know what xxxx-American means (non-American).

        • Frank Morris

          Oh, good. That means I'm a Texan-American!

        • Jacobite2

          But there is no such thing as a 'Texan' since several races and ethnicities are found there. You might be a xxx-Texan.

        • Frank Morris

          I was kinda making a joke about not being American. I wish Texas could run it's own affairs, rather than being dictated to by the DC morons.

        • Jacobite2

          My sense of humor has been taking a beating for the last 5-6 years. Texas is still 'way ahead of the other 49 States as far as taking care of its own business. Better start watching the border or you'll be part of Mexico again.

        • Frank Morris

          Agreed, and that is another big reason I'd like to see Texas as a sovereign republic once more. We've tried to institute sane measures to enforce our immigration laws, restore peace and order to our society, and see to the integrity of our elections, and the feds, under both Republican and Democrat admins, have interfered and stopped us at every turn.

        • Jacobite2

          I've been watching the parade of young, principled Republicans to Washington to stop the increasing oppression of their home-folks since Ike was President. By the time they come home to campaign for their first re-election, they're already looking at things through the Beltway perspective. Nobody who hasn't lived there for many years can begin to understand how completely DC can hypnotize even good people.

        • Frank Morris

          "My sense of humor has been taking a beating for the last 5-6 years."

          Believe me when I say, I fully understand, and feel the same!

  • Magic Newton

    Since we tend to hear about scientific advances, we tend to remember intellectual freedom while forgetting about the freedom to do things.

  • gotham1883

    Hate speech is anti-American, but not anti-Amerikan. It all depends on how you want to spell the name.

    • tom nogaro


      depends on which "is" you usin. lol.

  • scottymoore

    Let's just counter sue the PC police because their redefining of everything is offending more people and things than it's defending.
    The political violence is just trying to silence everyone into becoming no one.
    The game to rename is becoming a shame.

    • tom nogaro


      like the last line! lol.

      • scottymoore

        Thanks Tom, sometimes you gotta laugh at this stuff, but we still need to stand against this PC BS

        • tom nogaro

          ty, scotty.

          ab so freakin lutely, amigo.

  • tom nogaro

    i hate hate.

    now what? i go to prison forever and then directly to hell, or i get the nobel peaceability prize of the bi-lingual (aka fork tongue bipolar) universe and remain in heaven?

    all confoosin. whose on first? depends on "is".

  • KatRob

    Another attempt at keeping us Crackers in line. Because hate speech won't apply to blacks who spew anti-White rhetoric, hate speech.. The cRAP and hip hop artists will still be able to write lyrics about killing crackers, and it won't apply to them. A White guy writes lyrics about getting rid of blacks, he's charged with a hate crime. And notice this issue is being discussed in israel. They want to make it a crime to criticize israel and it's ethnic-cleansing of the Palestinians. That will come under anti-semetic hate speech to dare to criticize israHELL.

  • White Army

    Since people tend to wish that challenges be dealt with in a visible structured manner, centralized planning and control can be appealing.

    • Marie W

      Not when all decisions are made behind closed doors by one political party. Your keyword "visble", how about accountable... these words mean NOTHING to the current admin.