190 Retired Generals & Admirals Urge Congress to Reject Iran Nuke Deal


On July 14, 2015, Barack Obama announced that the United States and five other nations had reached an agreement with Iran to curb their nuclear program. The deal requires approval of Congress and they had 60 days in which to approve or reject the deal and that 60 day time limit expires in just a couple of weeks.

Most conservatives are also against the Iran nuclear deal largely because of Iran’s track record of lying, deceit and refusal to adhere to the demands of other nations. They see the deal as one-sided in Iran’s favor.

Israel has been very outspoken about the deal, stating that it would place them in greater danger of being attacked by Iran. However, Obama and Kerry have ignored Israel’s claims and are ready to throw them under the proverbial bus.

Now a group of nearly 190 retired generals and admirals have sent a letter to House Speaker John Boehner, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, urging them not to approve the deal. All of these military leaders have at some time in the past 30 years, served in the White House. Their letter reads:

“Dear Representatives Boehner and Pelosi and Senators McConnell and Reid:

As you know, on July 14, 2015, the United States and five other nations announced that a Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) has been reached with Iran to prevent it from developing nuclear weapons. In our judgment as former senior military officers, the agreement will not have that effect. Removing sanctions on Iran and releasing billions of dollars to its regime over the next ten years is inimical to the security of Israel and the Middle East. There is no credibility within JCPOA’s inspection process or the ability to snap back sanctions once lifted, should Iran violate the agreement. In this and other respects, the JCPOA would threaten the national security and vital interests of the United States and, therefore, should be disapproved by the Congress.

The agreement as constructed does not ‘cut off every pathway’ for Iran to acquire
nuclear weapons. To the contrary, it actually provides Iran with a legitimate path to doing that simply by abiding by the deal. JCPOA allows all of the infrastructure the Iranians need for a nuclear bomb to be preserved and enhanced. Notably, Iran is allowed to: continue to enrich uranium, develop and test advances centrifuges, and continue work on its Arak heavy-water plutonium reactor. Collectively, these concessions afford the Iranians, at worst, a ready breakout option and, at best, an incipient nuclear weapons capability a decade from now.

The agreement is unverifiable. Under the terms of the JCPOA and a secret side deal (to which the United States is not privy), the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) will be responsible for inspections under such severe limitations as to prevent them from reliably detecting Iranian cheating. For example, if Iran and the inspectors are unable to reach an accommodation with respect to a given site, the result could be at least a 24-day delay in IAEA access. The agreement also requires inspectors to inform Iran in writing as to the basis for its concerns about an undeclared site, thus further delaying access. Most importantly, these inspections do not allow access to Iranian military facilities, the most likely location of their nuclear weapons development efforts. In the JCPOA process, there is substantial risk of U.S. intelligence being compromised, since the IAEA often relies on our sensitive data with respect to suspicious and/or prohibited activity.

While failing to assure prevention of Iran’s nuclear weapons development capabilities, the agreement provides by some estimates $150 billion dollars or more to Iran in the form of sanctions relief. As military officers, we find it unconscionable that such a windfall could be given to a regime that even the Obama administration has acknowledged will use a portion of such funds to continue to support terrorism in Israel, throughout the Middle East and globally, whether directly or through proxies. These actions will be made all the more deadly since the JCPOA will lift international embargoes on Iran’s access to advanced conventional weapons and ballistic missile technology.

In summary, this agreement will enable Iran to become far more dangerous, render the Mideast still more unstable and introduce new threats to American interests as well as our allies. In our professional opinion, far from being an alternative to war, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action makes it likely that the war the Iranian regime has waged against us since 1979 will continue, with far higher risks to our national security interests. Accordingly, we urge the Congress to reject this defective accord.”

The letter is then signed by the 190 general and admirals representing all five branches of the military.

If you recall, I recently wrote that Obama’s Iranian nuclear deal could lead to the destruction of Israel and this letter supports what I wrote. I also wrote that once sanctions have been lifted that it will be financially devastating to a number of European countries and companies to re-instate the sanctions if Iran breaks the terms of the deal.

Everything I’ve read about the deal with Iran only benefits Iran and no one else. In fact, it places Israel and the rest of the world in more danger than they are now and anyone who supports the deal could be listed as a being a traitor to the United States for placing our national security in greater danger, which makes me wonder how much kickback Kerry and Obama are getting from Iran if the deal is passed.

Previous The Myth of the Radical Muslim Minority
Next Utah 5th State to Defund Planned Parenthood Following Release of Videos

Comment