Judge Rules on Personal Bias – Not the Law

live-oak-high-school-studentsJudge James Ware of the San Francisco Division of the Northern District of California District Court has made his second ruling based not upon law, but upon personal beliefs and standards.

First he ruled that it was legal for another judge who happens to be a homosexual to hear and rule on a case concerning homosexual marriage.  In Ware’s ruling, he said that there was no impropriety for a judge who is a homosexual to benefit from his own ruling by striking down Proposition 8.  California voters had voted to approve Prop 8 which defined marriage as a union between one man and one woman.

Some judicial watchdogs say this ruling was made partially for his fellow judge and partially for future personal benefit.  In past cases of law, it has always been considered a conflict of interest for a judge to be involved in a case that would have a personal impact upon them.  Judge Ware’s ruling threw judicial conflict of interest right out the window.

The second ruling from Judge Ware should also be grounds for removal from the bench.

Morgan Hill Unified School District issued a ban on wearing any clothing that depicted the American flag because other students threatened violence because of the clothing.  Incidentally, the threats came from Mexican students at the school on May 5, which is a Mexican holiday, not an American one.

When several students showed up at the school wearing t-shirts with the American flag, school officials told the students they needed to go home and change their shirts or turn them inside out.  The student’s parents filed a lawsuit against the school on the grounds that the school had violated the students’ constitutional rights.

According to the information provided to Judge Ware, other students were allowed to wear shirts with the Mexican flag on it as school officials had not heard of any threats made against them.  The Mexican students accosted the students wearing the American flag by shoving a Mexican flag into the chest of one student and shouting, “F— them white boys, f— them white boys” and “they are racist. They are being racist. F— them white boys. Let’s f— them up.”

Judge Ware dismissed the case claiming the school was acting properly as they were trying to protect the safety of students.  In his ruling, Ware said,

“Plaintiffs have offered no evidence demonstrating that students wearing the colors of the Mexican flag were likely to be targeted for violence, and that officials treated all students for whose safety they feared in the same manner.

“Here … [the school officials] have provided a non-discriminatory basis for asking plaintiffs to remove their American flag attire. Defendants have put forth significant evidence demonstrating that plaintiffs (wearing the American flag colors) were asked to change clothes in order to protect their own safety.

“The undisputed evidence shows that plaintiffs were the only students on campus whose safety was threatened that day.

“The court finds that they did not violate the First Amendment by asking plaintiffs to turn their shirts inside out.”

The Rutherford Institute’s president, John W. Whitehead, who handled the case for the parents, said,

 ”This is nothing more than a victory for political correctness.  If the court’s decision is allowed to stand, any speech a school official happens to dislike will be censored. Those who wrote our Constitution would be shocked.”

From what I have read about the case, school officials were grossly negligent in their handling of the incident to begin with.  The Mexican students started the whole incident with their threats and racist remarks.  The school should have viewed this as bullying and instantly detained or removed the Mexican students who were instigating everything.  Instead, they punished the targets of the abuse rather than the abusers.

The school was also wrong to ban the US flag from anything.  This is America and the flag is the symbol of America every day of the year.  Just because there is a holiday in a different country, that is no reason to tell American students they aren’t allowed to wear their national symbol while at the same time allowing other students to wear the symbol of another country.  That’s the same as raising another countries flag above the US flag on American soil, which does constitute a form of treason as well as stupidity.

If the Mexicans want to live in America and take advantage of what our country has to offer, then they need to embrace the symbol of our country as well.

If they hate the US flag and Americans that much they need to go back to Mexico and stay there.

email
Print Friendly

  • http://www.alltimeforex.com/tag/wealth/page/2 forex

    Someone necessarily help to make severely posts I might state. That is the very first time I frequented your website page and to this point? I surprised with the research you made to make this particular submit extraordinary. Excellent activity!

  • http://lowbloodpressurenaturally.info/HypertensionDangers.html Lower your blood pressure naturally

    My brother suggested I would possibly like this blog. He used to be totally right. This post truly made my day. You cann’t imagine simply how much time I had spent for this information! Thank you!

  • http://www.facebook.com/technovanza2012 Technovanza 2012

    Thank you a bunch for sharing this with all people you really know what you’re speaking about! Bookmarked. Kindly also discuss with my site =). We will have a link trade agreement between us

  • http://www,biztopia.co.uk tax

    Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wished to mention that I’ve really enjoyed surfing around your blog posts. In any case I?ll be subscribing to your feed and I’m hoping you write again soon!

  • http://www.freeonlineastrology.us If you like free online astrology this is it !!

    It’s really a great and useful piece of info. I’m glad that you shared this useful info with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.

  • http://www.cheap-family-vacations.info/travel-and-leisure/a-quick-review-of-the-jigalong-community Amanda Cook

    Excellent weblog right here! Additionally your website lots up fast! What web host are you the usage of? Can I am getting your associate hyperlink for your host? I wish my web site loaded up as fast as yours lol

  • http://www.buysnowchainsonline.com/product-details/us/B002KQCFK0/security-chain car snow chains

    Hi there, You have done a fantastic job. I will definitely digg it and for my part suggest to my friends. I’m sure they will be benefited from this site.

  • http://yearroundschool.org/wp-login.php?action=register year round school article

    Thanks a lot for the helpful content. It is also my opinion that mesothelioma cancer has an particularly long latency interval, which means that indication of the disease may well not emerge until 30 to 50 years after the initial exposure to mesothelioma. Pleural mesothelioma, that is the most common kind and influences the area within the lungs, might result in shortness of breath, chest muscles pains, plus a persistent coughing, which may cause coughing up blood.

  • http://code-reduction-solde.fr/code-reduction-amazon.html amazon bon reduction

    I just like the helpful information you supply for your articles. I will bookmark your blog and check again here regularly. I’m somewhat certain I will be told a lot of new stuff proper here! Good luck for the next!

  • http://www.bayanescortilsu.com/escort/ escort

    This is very interesting, You are an overly skilled blogger. I have joined your feed and look forward to searching for more of your wonderful post. Also, I have shared your website in my social networks

  • http://solicitorsbrentwood.com/privacy_policy/ solicitors brentwood

    of course like your web-site however you have to test the spelling on quite a few of your posts. Many of them are rife with spelling issues and I in finding it very troublesome to tell the reality nevertheless I will definitely come back again.

  • Top of Heap

    What's new,pussy-cat./ It's California.

  • Leon

    So the US shouldn't defend itself when attacked because this creates violence, that's what this judge is saying anyways. He is saying that the people commiting a crime of violence should be protected and the ones displaying loyalty should be punished, when someone is attacked when they did not attack who are we suppose to defend?

    Where the Mexican students punished for threatening violence?