The Dangers of Gun Control

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERAThere are those who “suspect the Obama administration used the gun-running operation [Fast and Furious] to support regulations Congress would not even consider, namely, a rule requiring gun stores in the Southwest to report anyone who tries to buy multiple ‘long guns,’ or rifles, in a one-week period.” The border between the United States and Mexico is dangerous. The federal government has tied the hands of states and counties to do anything about the unrestricted border and the violence and murders that take place there.

Foreign entities that want to see the United States toppled are using our porous border as an access point. Criminals don’t care anything for restrictive guns laws. In fact, they encourage them. Look what illegal drugs have done for the drug cartels of Mexico. Our restrictive gun laws have made them rich, well armed, and violent.

“All we are saying is give Peace a Chance.” John Lennon had the right idea, but he didn’t account for the fact that at least one person wanted him dead. I’m all for peace until someday wants to kill me. In the “On Religion” section of USA Today, Oliver “Buzz” Thomas appeals to the Bible to declare that Christians should work for peace in the world. I couldn’t agree more. Christian leaders should call for an international summit to establish a workable agenda to pursue peace in the world. At the same time, they should recognize that there are people in the world that want us dead.

In the movie Ben Hur (1959), there is a discussion between Balthasar and Judah Ben Hur about seeking revenge.

Judah: I must deal with Messala in my own way.

Balthasar: And your way is to kill him. I see this terrible thing in your eyes, Judah Ben-Hur. But no matter what this man has done to you, you have no right to take his life. He will be punished inevitably.

Overhearing their conversation, Sheik Ilderim speaks wisdom: “Balthasar is a good man. But until all men are like him, we must keep our swords bright!” If all those in the world had the heart of Balthasar, then there would be no need to discuss what the right response is regarding self-defense and war.

Mr. Thomas quotes some familiar New Testament passages in attempt to support his point that peace is the best way. Jesus tells us “Blessed are the peacemakers” (Matt. 5:9), but He doesn’t tell us what our response should be when someone, despite our best efforts to be peaceful, still wants to steal, rape, and murder.

Then there’s Jesus’ injunction to “turn the other cheek” (Matt. 5:38–39). There’s quite a difference between slapping someone across the face and someone wanting to take a baseball bat to your head. Self-defense is a biblical option in such cases:

“If the thief is caught while breaking in, and is struck so that he dies, there will be no bloodguiltiness on his account” (Ex. 22:2).

The homeowner can assume that someone breaking into his house at night has nothing but bad intentions.

So what is a legitimate reaction when we are told what the goals are of those who are planning to kill us in “the name of Allah” or anything else? Peace doesn’t have a chance!

The laws used by Mr. Thomas apply to personal relationships. They are not describing the proper response of governments or actions of self-defense. While governments should pursue peace in every way possible, there are still times when peace is not an option. We can see the differences when we compare Romans 12:17–21 with 13:4. Paul tells Christians, “If possible, so far as it depends on you, be at peace with all men” (12:18). Sometimes peace isn’t possible. While the individual is never to take his own “revenge” (12:19), the civil magistrate “does not bear the sword for nothing; for it is a minister of God, an avenger who brings wrath upon the one who practices evil” (13:4).

Mr. Thomas appeals to Christians to develop a proper biblical ethic regarding pursuing peace. He implies that he wants these personal views regarding peace to transfer over to the civil magistrate since that’s who wages war. He then ruins the deal by stating that “Our beloved nation is a civil state, not a religious one.” Then why should our civil leaders listen to Mr. Oliver’s biblical arguments? Mr. Thomas can’t have it both ways.

The push for gun control is a push for assured destruction. If only 10 percent of the Muslim world is radicalized, that’s 100 million Muslim radicals. A well-armed American population will stop any attempt by Islamic extremists to coordinate a planned domestic terror attack. I’m reminded of an exchange between Rick, Humphrey Bogart’s character in the film Casablanca (1942), and Major Heinrik Strasser (Conrad Veidt[1]):

Major Strasser: Are you one of those people who cannot imagine the Germans in their beloved Paris?
Rick: It’s not particularly my beloved Paris.
Heinz: Can you imagine us in London?
Rick: When you get there, ask me!
Captain Renault: Hmmh! Diplomatist!
Major Strasser: How about New York?
Rick: Well there are certain sections of New York, Major, that I wouldn’t advise you to try to invade.

At the present time, the United States would be difficult to invade, but if gun-control advocates get their way, it will be Red Dawn (1984 and 2012) with a different ending.

Sorry for all the film references, but I can’t help myself.

email
Print Friendly
Notes:
  1. Conrad Veidt (1893–1943) was a German actor. While playing a Nazi heavy in Casablanca, Veidt was married to a Jewish woman. They left Germany in 1933 and settled in the United Kingdom. Veidt fervently opposed the Nazi regime. []

  • Don DeHoff

    Everyone, at this point our best line of defense is at the ballot box. wher there will be far less bloodshed. Having said that, always have a plan "B" in your pocket, along with several others. We must remove those persons from office that are advocating gun contgrol, no-ID voting, Sharia Law, removing our Bill of Rightrs, etc. We must also demand Constitutional Amendments to restrict elected officials to salary caps, a single term in office, and age limits. That alone will curtail the current graft, corruption, and power issues by about 80%. It will also reduce the influence of big business, unions and the wealthy—-some ol' sage said, "the power of the pen is mightier than the sword", but keep your swords sharp and your powder dry. Part 1 of 2.

  • Don DeHoff

    Part 2 of 2; Remember the right to carry arms involves far more than just the right to protect one's self from criminals or for target shooting or game hunting. Also, you have not done your part unless you have contacted each of your elected representatives, regardless of their party affiliation, and presented your (our?) case. The Holiday Season is upon us; make an appointment (or just walk into) you representatives local office and present your case. The staff, for the most part are ordinary people like you and I, and they do have influence with their "boss". Maybe, just maybe, we can restore the conceipt of "we the people" that demand representation, not the powerful and big money.—Stand up and be counted, an let the readers know what results you have achieved!.

  • Anonymous

    The Second Amendment to Our Constitution (Part of The Bil of Rights) clearly states: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." No matter what the slick politicians try to make out of it, this amendment grants we the people to ieep and bear arms, and the government, State or Federal, are not to pllace any restrictions on us. If we allow them to take our firearms from us, we will soon lose all of our other rights and freedoms granted under our Constitution. In fact, we will lose our Constitution, for there are those like George Soros and his like, who have stated their main goal is to get rid of our Constitution, Declaration of Independence, etc.

  • SmithWinston6478

    "To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them." – George Mason
    "If the opposition refuses to disarm, we shall disarm it ourselves." — Joseph Stalin
    "One man with a gun can control 100 without one." — Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
    "Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined." — Patrick Henry
    "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." – Thomas Jefferson
    “When firearms go, all goes, we need them every hour.” – George Washington
    "Guns cause crime like wet sidewalks cause rain, cameras cause pornography, and spoons cause Rosie to be fat and stupid." — Neal Boortz

  • S Rubicon

    The loss of our 2nd Amendment rights, is a goal many on the left have. Those w/ nefarious intentions (and there are many), is to strip this right. However, once it goes, the rest of our rights will be whittled down to nothing. The United Nations already supports speech restrictions when it comes to religion. Specifically, some want anything said about their faith to be a crime. Once guy in Holland was put on trial over what some claimed disparaged their faith. The courts decided one cannot defame if one quotes another book & especially an accepted religious text. Perhaps its whats in the text that was the problem? Who knows?!
    The point is, speech will go quickly once the people are disarmed. Obama has already shown his penchant to go after those who speak out against him. Remember his outbursts about Fox News? He wanted all to boycot them. Apparently, he believes all media outlets should speak as those on MSNBC, better known as the Democrat Party TV Channel!

  • James White

    Guns in citizens' hands is the symbol of freedom in a land where liberty is rapidly being trampled by evil men, who would make us serfs. Let not one citizen forget that "the tree of liberty must at times by watered by the blood of tyrants and patriots." (Jefferson) I personally believe a "watering" is around the corner. This is just a continuation of the eternal battle of good vs evil.

  • S.L. zenatnof

    I BELIEVE IN GIVING PEACE A CHANCE, INDEED I DO, RIGHT AFTER WE WIN THE WAR AND NOT BEFORE. ANYTHING ELSE IS JUST GIVING OUR ENEMIES THE OPPORTUNITY TO RE-ARM AND ATTACK US AGAIN.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/22ZPZJO3NSMKRESG43IL2IZSB4 DavidL

    Never let the goverment take away our gun’s.That would be a very big mistake.