Why are Pastors Afraid to Speak about Politics?

Zipped LipsAn untapped resource to turn America around is found in the tens of thousands of churches in America. Many Christians don’t vote and their pastors encourage them to avoid politics. Then there are other churches where pastors are fearful of government reprisals, mostly from the IRS at the prompting of groups like the ACLU.

Keeping Christians from being involved beyond the church building and Sunday worship hour is becoming more common. But ever since Christians become politically active in the mid 1970s, secularists have gotten more vocal and strident. “That [Christians] may rant and rave against humanism and feminism and any other ‘ism’ on Sunday, but come Monday the children belong in school.”[1]

Tyrannical regimes are most fearful of organizations that don’t easily acquiesce to authority. We’re seeing this take place in China. “On the first Sunday of 2012, nearly 50 members of Shouwang Church in Beijing were detained following the church’s decision to continue its outdoor worship services that began in April, ChinaAid has learned.”

The latest attempt in the United States at intimidation is Pastor Charles Patrick of the Sunago Christian Fellowship Church who applied for the right to open a charter school. The application was denied because the applicant was a pastor.

It wasn’t that long ago in a nation not that far away that Christianity was seen as a threat to the governing authorities. Over time, churches in Nazi German were “confined as far as possible to the performance of narrowly religious functions, and even within this narrow sphere were subjected to as many hindrances as the Nazis dared to impose.” This is the evaluation of a 1945 report published by the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the precursor to the CIA. It was called The Nazi Master Plan: The Persecution of the Christian Churches and was prepared for the War Crimes Staff. It offered the following summary: “This study describes, with illustrative factual evidence, Nazi purposes, policies and methods of persecuting the Christian Churches in Germany and occupied Europe.”

Where did the strategic plan begin? “Implementation of this objective started with the curtailment of religious instruction in the primary and secondary schools with the squeezing of the religious periods into inconvenient hours, with Nazi propaganda among the teachers in order to induce them to refuse the teaching of religion, with vetoing of . . . religious text books, and finally with substituting [a] Nazi Weltanschauung [worldview] and ‘German faith’ for Christian religious denominational instruction. . . . At the time of the outbreak of the war . . . religious instruction had practically disappeared from Germany’s primary schools.” Does any of this sound familiar? This is a perfect description of our nation’s education system with the only difference being that a materialistic worldview and “secular” faith have replaced the once Christian worldview that served as the foundation of education in America.

The next step was to neutralize the impact that churches would have on politics. “Under the pretext that the Churches themselves were interfering in political and state matters, [the Nazis] would deprive the Churches, step by step, of all opportunity to affect German public life.” How often do we hear that the “separation between church and state” means that churches must remain silent on social and political issues, that pastors cannot use their pulpits (unless they’re liberal) to influence legislation?

When Martin Niemoeller used his pulpit to expose Adolf Hitler’s radical politics, “He knew every word spoken was reported by Nazi spies and secret agents.”[2] Leo Stein describes in his book I Was in Hell with Niemoeller how the Gestapo gathered evidence against Niemoeller:

Now, the charge against Niemoeller was based entirely on his sermons, which the Gestapo agents had taken down stenographically. But in none of his sermons did Pastor Niemoeller exhort his congregation to overthrow the Nazi regime. He merely raised his voice against some of the Nazi policies, particularly the policy directed against the Church. He had even refrained from criticizing the Nazi government itself or any of its personnel. Under the former government his sermons would have been construed only as an exercise of the right of free speech. Now, however, written laws, no matter how explicitly they were worded, were subjected to the interpretation of the judges.[3]

In a June 27, 1937 sermon, Niemoeller made it clear to those in attendance had a sacred duty to speak out on the evils of the Nazi regime no matter what the consequences: “We have no more thought of using our own powers to escape the arm of the authorities than had the Apostles of old. No more are we ready to keep silent at man’s behest when God commands us to speak. For it is, and must remain, the case that we must obey God rather than man.”[4] A few days later, he was arrested. His crime? “Abuse of the pulpit.”

The “Special Courts” set up by the Nazis made claims against pastors who spoke out against Hitler’s policies. Niemoeller was not the only one singled out by the Gestapo. “Some 807 other pastors and leading laymen of the ‘Confessional Church’ were arrested in 1937, and hundreds more in the next couple of years.”[5]

A group of Confessional Churches in Germany, founded by Pastor Niemoeller and other Protestant ministers, drew up a proclamation to confront the political changes taking place in Germany that threatened the people “with a deadly danger. The danger lies in a new religion,” the proclamation declared. “The church has by order of its Master to see to it that in our people Christ is given the honor that is proper to the Judge of the world. . . . The First Commandment says ‘Thou shalt have no other gods before me.’ The new religion is a rejection of the First Commandment.”[6] Five hundred pastors who read the proclamation from their pulpits were arrested.

It’s not this bad in America – at least not yet.

email
Print Friendly
Notes:
  1. Rheta Grimsley Johnson, “‘People’ vs. fundamentalists,” The Marietta Daily Journal (September 2, 1986), 4A. []
  2. Basil Miller, Martin Niemoeller: Hero of the Concentration Camp, 5th ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1942), 112. []
  3. Leo Stein, I Was in Hell with Niemoeller (New York: Fleming H. Revell, 1942), 175. []
  4. Quoted in William L. Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1960), 239 []
  5. Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, 239. []
  6. Quoted in Eugene Davidson, The Trials of the Germans: An Account of the Twenty-Two Defendants before the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg (Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press, [1966] 1997), 275. []

  • http://twitter.com/dadofping @dadofping

    If only our Pastors would heed this warning and be unafraid to speak all truth from the pulpit; the Truth about our need to trust in God for everything and in Christ alone for our salvation, certainly, but not stop there. They must not be afraid to, from the pulpit, take on the governing authorities and align themselves with citizen statesmen (and stateswomen) who are willing to sacrifice their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor to preserve and defend the Constitution and Republic which God through our Forefathers has entrusted to us. Pray for such Pastors to shepherd His flock, before it is too late for America.

  • John Madison

    I’m from Detroit. This is all news to me. All the black pastors in the City of Detroit are bought and paid for by the Democrat Party. The pastors all supported Obama from thier pulpits in 2008, and I expect it will be the same in 2012. I keep waiting for intelligent blacks to finally decide not to be the “house negroes” for liberals. I’m afraid it will never happen.

  • buck

    Why is it permissable for UNIONS to be involved in government or vice-versa but not religious organizations , I propose a Christian union that will be the citizens advocate to deal with the governments at both the state and federal level . Of course if the ACLU and other miscreants weren't permitted to misinterpet the first Amendment none of this would be necessary . Man thinks he is so brilliant that he needs no God , and based on that fact I would like to see a meteorite the size of the moon slam into this failed experiment in humanity .

  • Ron Chase

    Two things people argue over most is “religion and politics”, can you imagine the two coming together? Having said that, the “moral majority” in the country must wake up and DO something about what is happening in our country today. If that requires sermonizing from the pulpit, so-be-it. Preachers don’t need to take a left or right stance, but they should fire up their congregations to stem the tide of “uncivility” so prevalent in today’s society. If that is not “politically correct”, to bad!

  • Twitch

    Martin Niemöller was not the only theologian to oppose Hitler; Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a Lutheran theologian involved in the assassination plots and for that he was eventually martyred. Bonhoeffer is one of my personal heroes because he stood up to evil and was willing to pay the ultimate price in order to do what was right. We need people like Neimoller and Bonhoeffer today.

  • PreacherCruz

    Sadly, the reason for this is the same as the reason for not touching on controversial topics in general for many churches….Primarily FINANCIAL!  When you add the threat of losing your “Tax Exempt” status, many church leaders are coerced into a sort of uneasy silence….This is just ONE reason that any religious group or entity should REFUSE tax exempt status.  It is like asking the state for a sanction on your existence and if ties your hands as to what you can say…. http://www.kjv-truth-ministries.org 100% free to speak, Christian website and blog.