California to Allow Women to Serve Jail Time at Home

guestopinionI recently reported that the Commonwealth of Kentucky was releasing 990 inmates early this week along with another 300 a month for the rest of the year until they meet the budget savings goal.

Gov. Jerry Brown has been trying to find ways to reduce the huge deficit in the state’s finances.  One of the budget cuts he has initiated involves transferring more than 8,000 low-level offenders from state prisons to county jails.  While this may help the state’s budget deficit, it’s definitely not going to help the counties receiving the extra inmates.

An added budget reduction measure is a program known as the Alternative Custody Program.  There are approximately 10,000 women in California prisons and under the Alternative Custody Program as many as 5,000 of them may see an early release.

Under a new program, women convicted of low-level offenses may be allowed to qualify to serve the remainder of their time at their homes.  To date, approximately 20 women have been allowed to return home to serve out the rest of their sentence.  Additionally, this number may be increased to as many as 500.

Excuse me, but I thought that the term ‘prison’ or ‘jail’ meant a confinement away from home as a means of punishment for committing a crime.  Allowing a woman to return home to serve her jail sentence is no deterrent to her or others.  It’s the proverbial ‘slap on the wrist.’

The whole world laughs at the American penal system because of how it is run.  There have been so many social do-gooders and prisoner rights activists involved that prisoners have more rights than the victims of their crimes.  You can’t put too many prisoners in the same cell, judges have ruled that you have provide them with at least one cable channel on the television and you have to give them access to computers and the internet.

Prisoners sentenced to life are often eligible for parole in 20-25 years and a ten year sentence generally means about 2-3 years behind bars before they are released on parole.  In California in 2004, there were 165,000 inmates in state prisons.  There were 58,725 parolees that were sent back to prison while on parole.  Of that 58,725, about 35,000 were sent back for committing a new crime while the rest were sent back for parole violations (carrying weapons, drugs, etc.).

So what makes California prison officials and Gov. Brown believe that these women that are allowed to serve the remainder of their sentences at home will not violate those terms or commit another crime?  Another question that needs to be addressed to all those involved in early releases in California, Kentucky and any other state, is what kind of danger are they placing the general public in by releasing violent offenders as well as low-level offenders?

They need to remember one of the truths of life which is that actions have consequences, and these officials need to be held accountable for the consequences of their actions.

email
Print Friendly

  • PJS

    Serving at home, they can pop out some brand new welfare check earners as well as get breeding calls from thier "boy friends".

  • Ralph

    More discrimination and lack of common sense.

    • Donna

      Lack of common sense, I agree: BUT where do you come up with "more discrimination"?

  • 1599

    Why does it cost so much to house prisoners?

  • vincent

    And they can sell pharmaceuticals to get spending money for essentials-pedicures, Jack Daniels, cigs, lotto tickets, laptops to hone those Facebook skills, 20″ rims for the SUV, bling, tatoos, guns, and herbal remedies for their baby daddies.

  • http://StolenValor.com Blaine Playcraft

    Maybe can pick up a few bucks on the 'side' while 'imprisoned' in their homes. I am sure some of these homes would not lend themselves to be featured in the next issue of Homes and Gardens.

  • billstanley1

    "… transferring more than 8,000 low-level offenders from state prisons to county jails. While this may help the state’s budget deficit, it’s definitely not going to help the counties receiving the extra inmates." — LA County jails are "overcrowded" and inmates typically serve 20 percent of the courts' sentences. Lindsay Lohan pled guilty to stealing a bracelet and was sentenced to 30 days. She was expected to serve 6 days, but actually served 5 hours. Expect more of this when prison inmates are transferred to LA County jails. http://www.newsandopinions.net

  • SEAN MURRY

    what a joke only in california.

    • Jaye

      No, unfortunately, personal responsibility is dead in this whole country.

  • ConservaDave

    Biblically, murder, rape and kidnapping were capital offences and sentences were carried out swiftly. Crimes against property were not treated as jailable offenses but the offenders were forced to repay their victims fourfold or become slaves to pay off their debt. 21st century application could reduce prison populations substantially. There might be a place for non violent drug offenders and such to be placed under house arrest. Illegal alien (I thought they all came here to do the jobs we Americans don't want to do?) criminals should be deported and the borders CLOSED (no pussyfooting around) except those worthy of execution. "When the judgments of the Lord are in the earth the inhabitants thereof will learn righteousness." _Isaiah

  • julian

    Why just women, isn't this sexual discrimination?

  • rannan3

    Men convicted of low level crimes should be lining up lawyers against this one.
    No doubt the ACLU would volunteer, this definitely sounds like discrimination
    to me too. After all…..why just women ??
    When gender seems to be one of the qualifying factors, doesn't that leave the
    other gender 'out in the cold ' ?

  • Jeff

    What's the state of CA to do? We're going broke. Maybe…lower the criteria to get capital punishment, like in Singapore?
    One thing for sure, they don't have any crime issues. Certainly no over-crowded prisons.