A True Principled Voting Lesson for the GOP

voting-boothThe GOP is in a serious dilemma. It has two warring factions.

On one side are the traditional Republican voters. They will vote for any candidate with an R behind his name. They have one goal: Defeat Obama.

On the other side are the Ron Paul voters. A growing minority, they present both a threat and a promise to the GOP. A threat, because they won’t vote for the Republican establishment’s candidates no matter what. A promise, because they inject new blood in a party that has grown so old that its party rallies resemble the Soviet Politburo in the 1980s: a gerontocracy that doesn’t even remember what it is there after.

These young Ron Paul voters have one goal: Elect Ron Paul.

The GOP leadership knows that without these young voters they won’t be able to defeat Obama. The only serious candidate besides Ron Paul – Mitt Romney – has no appeal to them, no matter how deferential he is to Ron Paul on the stage. Senator DeMint – by far the most principled conservative in the Senate – already knows it and spoke about it. Even FOX News and its pundits know that there is no path to the White House without Ron Paul’s supporters. If FOX News got the news, then everyone else already knows it.

For some reason the two factions are in a war against each other. And that’s the GOP’s dilemma. Mitt Romney is unelectable in a general election. Ron Paul is opposed by the traditional GOP voters. Is there a solution?

There is, of course. The goals of the two factions are not mutually exclusive. Defeat Obama is not opposite to Elect Ron Paul. In fact, as the GOP and FOX News already know, there is no defeat of Obama without Ron Paul. So the solution is obvious:

Nominate Ron Paul.

It achieves the goals for both factions in the GOP. Ron Paul will bring with him the fresh blood of his supporters who will be happy to have their man nominated. And the unity in the Republican Party – plus the countless non-Republican votes for Ron Paul – will help defeat Obama. Any other attempt at a solution is hopelessly utopian given the reality of the political dynamics within the GOP. A simple solution given the fact that it is too late to change anything and make Romney appealing to those young voters. Apply the solution, and Obama is toast.

I want to see Obama defeated. I hope the GOP voters will listen to reason and vote on principle, and practical wisdom. It is the way the political system works. They will have to compromise in supporting the best candidate that can get elected, not who they believe is the best candidate. This means, in turn, that they must always account for how their fellow citizens will or are likely to vote – specifically the Ron Paul voters. This means, in plainer words, that no person is an island: we’re all in this thing together, and we can’t pretend that an individual or a comparatively small group can dictate who the candidate or President will be. We have a name for societies that can do that: dictatorships. In the United States, you have to win over a majority of votes (or, the electoral college, a majority of electors). If they think about it, this also means that in a general election, every principled non-vote for the best electable but not the best candidate in favor of the best non-electable candidate is a vote for the worst-but-very-electable candidate. Which means, that a vote for Romney – who can’t win without Ron Paul’s voters anyway, against Obama – is a vote for Obama. Well-intentioned GOP voters may have felt very pleased with themselves for their principled vote, but intentions aren’t counted at the ballot box. Only votes are. Perhaps GOP voters should consider adopting the principle that they will never help elect the worst candidate and abandon the principle that they will help elect the unelectable best candidate.

In making political decisions in a modern Western constitutional democracy like the United States, the first lesson you learn is that the best is often the enemy of the possible. As the pundits already know, it is only possible to defeat Obama with the votes of Ron Paul’s supporters. It is impossible at this stage of the game to transfer their votes to Romney (or to Gingrich, or to Santorum, for that matter).

This leads to a final point. Politics is the reflection of culture. Citizens get generally the candidates they deserve — or at least that they collectively want. This means that if you want to change politics, you should work to change culture. If Ron Paul is unacceptable, work hard so that in a few years, better candidates will survive the primary process. But as of now, look at what is possible. If it isn’t possible for a certain candidate to win without the support of a significant bloc of voters, drop him. Vote for the one that can bring all the voters in the party together.

The solution for the GOP is simple: Vote Ron Paul. It will solve all the problems, and will restore all unity in the Party. And if you don’t like Ron Paul, work for the next four years to convince those Ron Paul voters. It is too late at this point. Compromise, give them what they want, so that we see Obama defeated. In four years, when Obama is not running, work again for your preferred candidate.

email
Print Friendly

About Bojidar Marinov
A Reformed missionary to his native Bulgaria for over 10 years, Bojidar preaches and teaches doctrines of the Reformation and a comprehensive Biblical worldview. Having founded Bulgarian Reformation Ministries in 2001, he and his team have translated over 30,000 pages of Christian literature about the application of the Law of God in every area of man’s life and society, and published those translations online for free. He has been active in the formation of the Libertarian movement in Bulgaria, a co-founder of the Bulgarian Society for Individual Liberty and its first chairman.
  • hot02rod

    NEWT,NEWT,NEWT,NEWT,NEWT,NEWT,NEWT. HE IS THE ONLY MAN THAT CAN AND WILL BEAT obumer. KEEP YOUR FREEDOM,RIGHTS,FREEDOM FROM RELIGION PERSECUTION AND GET ISLAM,SHARIAH LAW AND THE MUSLIM OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE. GOD BLESS THE U S A .

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001067165247 Monica Gaither

       You are disgusting.  Why you would be behind a man that has stolen and cheated is beyond me.  But your Islamo-phobe rhetoric is ridiculous. 

      IF we were in such fear of terrorists…why the hell do we have our borders WIDE open?????

  • Vic Vixvi

    I am a 52 year old, life-long Republican 'super-voter', Air Force veteran and I will be supporting Ron Paul. He's the only one that can defeat Obama. Without him the youth vote swings back to Obama, the Paul Indys vote 3rd party and Obama gets another four years.

    i agree wholeheartedly with the author of this article.

    • Gail

      Except that national polls clearly show that Paul can NOT defeat Obama. Have you ever looked at the polls? Seriously? Polls of AMERICANS across the country (not just Republicans) show Paul losing in a landslide to Obama.

      Your notion that he is the only one who can beat Obama is not based in reality. Polls show that's simply not true.

      • JustMeBB

        Have you observed to what degree Senator Paul has been disenfranchised? By the media? By the GOP? It is people like you who keep the “un-electable” lie alive.  By some, that’s called  ”poisoning the well”.  Tell people the well is poisoned (or in Paul’s case, “un-electable”) & no one will drink, no matter how refreshing the water really is (or in Paul’s case, votes suffer).  I’m hearing that NO ONE can defeat Obama! Is that believable? Does that mean I should stay home? Or does that mean that it’s time to take a stand? 

  • 71cijug

    If you can get the Independent vote and enough Democrats, you, Paul, will win.

    You'll be doing it without the majority of Republicans, and Paul won't unite the Party.

    There is a disease within the Party from top to bottom that may be incurable. The bigger question in my mind is whether we continue to try, or say "Goodbye!" and prepare for the next cycle. As a practical matter, we have a one-party system. It needs a counterbalance.

  • Gail

    First of all, nationwide polls show that Ron Paul can NOT beat Obama; he polls way behind Obama. So your claim that only Ron Paul can beat Obama is ludicrous.

    Secondly, it's pretty stupid to say that we should just all get behind Ron Paul since the Paulbots would rather see Obama elected than vote for the GOP nominee. The Paulbots are throwing a temper tantrum and Godfather, you're giving in!

    • Gail

      It is WAY past time for the Paulbots to admit that any of the Republican candidates is better than Obama.

      Romney may have authored Romneycare and flip-flopped, but he also balanced the budget of Massachusetts, turning a deficit into a surplus. Obama is committed to HUGE government debt. So, as you can see, Romney is better than Obama.

      Newt may have made an ad with Pelosi and not approved Ryan's plan, but Newt was responsble for 4 consecutuve balanced budgets under Clinton and the resulting budget surplus. First time since the 1920s. Obama is committed to huge government debt and driving this nation into the ground. So as you can see, Newt is better than Obama.

      Santorum may have supported Specter over Toomey, but he supports closing the borders. Obama wants the borders wide open. So as you can see, Santoum is better than Obama.

      • Gail

        Then there is the fact that Obama constantly ignores the law and behaves as a dictator: refusing to attend a hearing in Georgia, signing treaties and saying they are now law, making appointments when he is not authorized, etc. There is no way that Romney, Gingrich, or Santorum would EVER do such a thing. Any one of them would be better than Obama.

        In addition, you are failing to acknowledge that most voters (not all, but most) vote straight-party. They pick a presidential candidate and then pull the lever for that candidate's party all the way down through the federal government, the states, and the local municipalities. A pull of the lever for Obama means a Democrat sweep of the NATION. A pull of the lever for ANY Republican presidential candidate means a Republican sweep across tne nation, throwing Democrats out of the Senate, state legislatures, governorships, and city councils.

        • Gail

          It is WAY past time for Paulbots to admit that defeating Obama is far more important than throwing a temper tantrum. I know, I know, you're going to insist that you won't compromise your principals and vote for the lesser of two evils. But you know what? The Tea Party does have REAL influence, and the Tea Party freshman class sent to the House in 2010 has passed more than 30 bills overturning OBamacare, lowering taxes, boosting the economy, and restoring our freedoms. Trouble is that their bills are being ignored by Harry Reid, Senate Majority Leader. But if you will just hold your nose and vote for whoever the GOP nominee is for president, you will help usher in MORE conservative Tea-Party-oriented legislators at the federal, state, county and local level.

          Staying home and letting Obama and the Democrats crush us is treason. Paul supporters, stand up for your country and defeat Obama! Vote Paul in the primary, but if he doesn't win, don't let Obama destroy us!

    • mridens

      “First of all, nationwide polls show that Ron Paul can NOT beat Obama; he polls way behind Obama.”

      I guess that depends on who you listen to.  Rasmussen Reports, probably the most respected polling organizations there is, consistently puts both Ron Paul and Mitt Romney in a virtual tie with Obama nationwide, while Santorum and Gingrich are significantly behind.

      Turn off Faux News, they lie and distort just as bad as the MSM .  All media is for big government.  Pretty much like our politics.  A democrat will come right out and tell you what he plans to do and you can argue socialism with him.  A republican will say they are for limited government, less debt and so forth and then pretty much screw the public once they get elected.  I would rather deal with scum who do not try and convince me they are really whipped cream. 

  • James G. Needham

    If Obama wins, noone wins!  If there are more than two candidates on the November ballot a vote for any candidate other than the Republican candidate will be a vote for Obama.  This is the fruit of the two party system – any other party candidates will be votes for Obama!