Could Rick Santorum Beat Mitt Romney if Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul Drop Out of Race?

If you’ve been watching the caucuses, primaries and polls as I have, perhaps you may be asking yourself the same question: could Rick Santorum beat Mitt Romney if Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul were to drop out of the race?

To start with, I find it interesting that the overall delegate count runs completely opposite to the conservativeness of the candidate.  The most conservative of the four is Ron Paul, followed by Newt Gingrich, then Rick Santorum and then you are left with the liberal Mitt Romney.  Based on this, I would estimate that the majority of the people that voted for Paul and Gingrich would probably have voted for Santorum over Romney, but how many is anyone’s guess.  For the sake of argument, I’m going to say that 70% of the Paul and Gingrich votes would have gone for Romney, so let’s examine the prior caucuses and primaries and see where that places Santorum in relation to Romney.

Iowa Caucus: 28 Delegates, Non-binding; Romney 12, Santorum 14

Adjusted: Delegates: Romney 10, Santorum 16

 

New Hampshire: 12 Delegates, Proportional; Romney – 7, Santorum - 0

Adjusted: Delegates: Romney – 8, Santorum – 2

 

South Carolina: 25 Delegates, Winner take all; Delegates: Romney – 25, Santorum – 0

Adjusted: Delegates: Romney – 0, Santorum – 25

 

Florida: 50 Delegates, Winner take all; Delegates: Romney – 50, Santorum - 0

Adjusted: Delegates: Romney – 50, Santorum - 0

 

Nevada: 28 Delegates, Proportional; Delegates: Romney – 14, Santorum - 3

Adjusted: Delegates: Romney – 17, Santorum – 11

 

Colorado: 36 Delegates, Non-binding; Delegates: Romney – 9, Santorum – 18

Adjusted: Delegates: Romney – 15, Santorum – 21

 

Minnesota: 40 Delegates, Non-binding; Delegates: Romney – 0, Santorum – 37

Adjusted: Delegates: Romney – 0, Santorum – 37

 

Maine: 24 Delegates, Non-binding; Delegates: Romney – 12, Santorum – 0

Adjusted: Delegates: Romney – 14, Santorum – 7

 

Arizona: 29 Delegates, Winner take all; Delegates: Romney – 29, Santorum – 0

Adjusted: Delegates: Romney – 29, Santorum - 0

 

Michigan: 30 Delegates, Hybrid Proportional; Delegates: Romney – 16, Santorum – 14

Adjusted: Delegates: Romney – 14, Santorum – 16

 

Washington: 43 Delegates, Non-binding; Delegates: Romney – 30, Santorum – 5

Adjusted: Delegates: Romney – 22, Santorum - 21

 

The current actual total of delegates is Romney 204; Santorum 91.  The adjusted total would be Romney – 179, Santorum – 116.  Therefore, accounting for the estimated adjustment, Romney would still be leading in total delegates, but what about the primaries yet to come.  If it were a two man race, would the outcomes be different?

Since neither Gingrich or Paul have given any indication of dropping out any time soon, guess we’ll just have to see what happens and keep on speculating the ‘what if’.


  • http://www.facebook.com/charles.c.murphree Charles Murphree Jr

    Speaking for the Paul supporters: Most of us would not vote for Santorum even if Paul endorsed him. It's been compromises like these that have gotten us into this political pickle in the first place. No compromise!

    • Mobley22

      Go take your candidate to the land of anarchy. The reason why God has appointed the magistrate is to punish the evil doer. If you take that our the equation (which Paul) does, the magistrate has nothing left to do - and then we live in a land of anarchy. Libertarianism is a half-step away from anarchy. Libertarians are pro-abortion and pro-sodomite.

      • Peter

        And your God appears to be the "Father of Lies".

        The official "Libertarian Party"s position is pro abortion and pro homosexual.
        There are plenty of  "Libertarians" who are not. Ron Paul is clearly not.

        Ron Paul is clearly not an anarchist. The federal government was designed to have specific enumerated responsabilities. He clearly supports returning and restricting it to those limited responsabilities.

        If you read your bible you would find that concept all over the place.

        Our counrties real problem is immoral people, like you.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

           It is quite clear that Paul is an anarchist in those he has supported over the years.  He would say it is perfectly ok for the states to have different laws in such things as abortion, homsexuality drugs and prostitution.   In this he is amoral when he could do the right thing he gives them the desires of their hearts.   Libertarians by default fall into several areas and Paul is one of the bad ones.   We got rid of his kind along with the articles of confederation his thoughts are not of the American Revolution but, the French one.

      • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

         Libertarians are nothing like anarchists.  You are confused.  Libertarians believe in following the constitution and allowing the states (local governments) make/enforce their laws. 

        • keyesforpres

          I've met some Paul supporters that are borderline anarchists.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           Most are not. 

        • keyesforpres

          But those that are anarchists support Paul.

    • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

       It's Ron Paul or it's not at all.  I will vote for Ron Paul, even if I have to write him in.  I know first hand, this goes for most Ron Paul supporters.  Ron Paul can take the youth vote from Obama.  The others cannot.  The real question is:  Do the Republicans want to lose to Obama again?

      • keyesforpres

        Yeah, thanks for showing (yet again) that is all about your messiah and not the country. Obama gets back in and our country is gone. Pat yourself on the back though since you'll vote third party or not at all.

    • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

       No compromise!

  • Mobley22

    Romney is a chump and Ron Paul is his dog. Ron (no integrity) Paul will never criticize Romney even though Romney is the most liberal and least constitutional because Ron Paul is a self-serving panderer. Ron Paul will continue to attack every real conservative because he wants Romney to get the election. The reason he wants Romney to get the election is so that he can justify a 3rd party run. He would obviously have much less support in a 3rd party run if Santorum was the Republican nominee. But if Romney the out and out liberal were the nominee, then people would give Ron Paul a pass on his 3rd part run. I'll take it a step further. Ron Paul will embark in a 3rd party run even though he knows it will help Obama win. Why? He will do it because it will help Obama win? Why?! Because if Obama wins (as opposed to a conservative like Santorum) then Ron Paul continues to have an audience and supporters. Ron Paul wants the country to take a nose dive so he can pretent he is its saviour. This is why Ron Paul is disguesting.

    Read more: 2009 Romney Pushes Individual Mandate - Godfather Politics http://godfatherpolitics.com/4009/2009-romney-pushes-individual-mandate/#ixzz1oL8lvu4G

    • Bill Polhemus

      Romney supported the individual mandate. So to try to get the legislation right, he had the Heritage Foundation draft it.

      Gingrich was the earliest proponent of the individual mandate.

      Check your Bill of Rights. It's under "Tenth Amendment."

      • keyesforpres

        The Heritage Foundation did not draft it for Romney.

        • Bill Polhemus

          From the 10/18/2011 Republican Candidate Debate:

          ROMNEY: Actually, Newt, we got the idea of an individual mandate from you.
          GINGRICH: That’s not true. You got it from the Heritage Foundation.
          ROMNEY: Yes, we got it from you, and you got it from the Heritage Foundation and from you.
          GINGRICH: Wait a second. What you just said is not true. You did not get that from me. You got it from the Heritage Foundation.
          ROMNEY: And you never supported them?
          GINGRICH: I agree with them, but I’m just saying, what you said to this audience just now plain wasn’t true.
          (CROSSTALK)
          ROMNEY: OK. Let me ask, have you supported in the past an individual mandate?
          GINGRICH: I absolutely did with the Heritage Foundation against Hillarycare.
          ROMNEY: You did support an individual mandate?
          ROMNEY: Oh, OK. That’s what I’m saying. We got the idea from you and the Heritage Foundation.

        • keyesforpres

          He got the idea there? I doubt it. HE is using that to justify it, but I am sure that came from Romney's own head.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

           RomneyCare is much, much to liberal to ever been thought up by Heritage Foundation.   Much more liberal than HillaryCare to

        • Mobley22

          I saw that debate. Newt was claiming that his (Newts idea,  not Romney's idea) idea came from the Heritage foundation. Romney is a bald face liberal and has nothing to do with the Heritage Foundation.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

         Incorrect the Heritage foundation did not pen the Romney solution.  What they did do was  look at solutions against what was called Hillarycare and that is what Newt supported . Not what either Clinton came up with or what Romney passed.

    • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

      Your delusional or an Idiot, Paul has not attacked a single conservative yet. He sure has bombarded frauds pretending to be conservatives though.

      Santorum, Romney and Gingrich all have records that prove them to be frauds and liars, any one who relates to them and attacks Paul, who they have nothing on is simply afraid to look in the mirror.

      BRASS TACKS - If anyone besides Paul gets the nomination Obama does a second term unless he is forcefully removed from office due to his ineligibility.  Because without the support of Paul's voting block and all the Independent and crossover voters none of the have a SNOWFLAKES CHANCE IN HELL of beating Obama.

      • keyesforpres

        There's way more Santorum/Newt supporter than there are Paul supporters.

      • Mobley22

        Your problem is that you don't know what a conservative is. Someone who embraces and encourages sodomites (Romney and Paul) is not a conservative. Someone who is completely entangled in the pro-abortion position (Romney and Paul) is not a conservative. Someone who advocates mass murder in our own land by getting us all nuked is not a conservative. Ronald Regan was a conservative. Ron Paul hates conservates so much that when Regan was in charge he left the Republican party in a temper tantrum. Ron Paul is simply not  a conservative. You say if Ron Paul  doesn't get the nod then Obama wins? How so, because all of the Obama supporters will die laughing? Get real.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           lies. 

          Now for a few facts:

          Ron Paul helped get Ronald Reagan elected. 
          Ronald Reagan said that true conservationism is libertarianism.  (He really did)

           Ron Paul left the Republican party for a short time while Reagan was in because Ron Paul didn't like Ronald Reagan's big government.  In other words, Ronald Reagan wasn't conservative enough for Ron Paul.  Now that is conservatism. 

    • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

       OK, nothing you posted here is based on facts.  Ron Paul has put out ads, since way in the beginning that criticize Mitt Romney.  Paul and Romney have both said that this rumor is false.  Romney and Paul are total opposites. 

      Santorum, Gingrich, and Romney are three of a kind. 

      The people spreading these lies are Santorum and the corporate media...
      and of course people like you.  Anyone who has been following this
      election (especially Ron Paul) knows this is all a lie. 

      Need proof?  Here are ALL of Ron Paul's campaign ads in order of release date since the beginning of the 2012 campaign. 

      http://r3voluti0n.com/ads/

      Spreading this rumor just shows that you have no idea what is going on.  Sheeple repeating everything the corporate media tells them.  No wonder our country is in so much trouble!

      • keyesforpres

        Blah, blah, blah, an ad against Romney, blah, blah, blah. Paul has NEVER gone after Romney in a debate. Just a lame ad that Romney is a flip flopper. Whoopie.

      • Mobley22

        I'm not going to your Ron Paul site to hear why you think Ron Paul is a nice guy. So the facts. You say Ron Paul puts out added. Putting something you youtube is free, so I don't buy that. Facts. If Paul and Romney are so opposite then why are the other Paul supporters on this board saying that if Paul was not in the race they would support Romney if they had to? They are the most similiar in that they are the most liberal and most like Obama.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           Huh?  These were paid ads, that were run during the primaries and caucuses.  You are just making up your arguments as you go.  They are not even real situations. 

          1. I don't type on my site why I think "Ron Paul is a nice guy"

          2. The ads are from TV (Paid)

          3. Ron Paul and Romney are completely opposites.  If you knew anything, you would know that.

          4. Paul supporters would never vote for Romney, not the true supporters of liberty, the constitution, and the free market.

          5. Paul and liberal are complete opposites.  Maybe you don't know what liberal means?  Romney is liberal (Both sides of the fence) 

  • cama9

    Ron Paul is not going to drop out because, as Ben Swann pointed out, Ron Paul, along with Romney, are securing most of the delegates.
    Colarado won't be awarding delegates until April, Maine won't be awarding delegates until May, and Iowa and Colorado won't be awarding delegates until June. Michigan's delegates are non-binding so we don't know how many of them are closet Ron Paul supporters.
    I don't know where you are getting your figures from, but there is no way Santorum can even get anywhere near the amount needed because he isn't on all the ballots. Statistically, he can't get the number.

  • Bill Polhemus

    Something people invariably forget in trying to do these sorts of calculations: The majority of Republican primary voters prefer Romney by a very wide margin. Santorum is unknown, and far more of a "Washington insider" than Romney will ever be. Ex-Senators make poor presidents (Obama and JFK, anyone?)

    I'm a conservative. I support Romney. Forget this notion that he's the "establishment choice." "The Establishment" is Santorum and Gingrich.

    • Flo

      There is no conservative in this race.  Oh, I forgot, all three have had those magical conversions.  Newt is no longer a New World Order guy and sitting on the love seat with Nan touting global warming and calling Paul Ryan's budget right wing social engineering.  Mittens is now pro-life, pro-second amendment, against the mandate and for traditional marriage.  Santorum is now against No Child Left Behind, the bridge to nowhere and raising the debt ceiling over and over. 

      • Bill Polhemus

        Explain to me what the next Republican President is going to do for:

        1. Gun Control

        2. Abortion Rights

        3. Homosexual Marriage

        4. Defending Obamacare

        I really want to hear this.

        • Mobley22

          If it is Ron Paul he will do absolutely nothing about any of these. Except that he will say that he is in favor of sodomite marraige and that it should be a state right. So for some of these evils he will do worse than nothing - he will encourage the evil.

    • Mobley22

      So why have all the liberals and loosers come out to back Romney? Please explain. 1. John McCain. 2. Bob Dole? (you are against Senators, did you support McCain and Dole?)

  • Dusty1

    Toe to toe, man to man, Gingrich would destroy Obama.  The way Nancy Pelosi's fangs came out a month ago, threatening to reveal "stuff" about Gingrich, right in the middle of our vetting process, was very telling.  It told of a genuine FEAR the Left have of Gingrich.  Could it be because they know he's quite smart, very experienced and would make Obama look like a child in any debate?  I don't care about his baggage, I care about the future of this country.  Too bad his "baggage" is keeping his numbers so low.

    • kysteelgirl

      In my mind, his biggest "suitcase" is his amnesty agenda!

      • keyesforpres

        BINGO!! That would destroy our country.

        Go here to see their grades on illegal immigration:

        http://www.numbersusa.com

    • SilkyWiley

      First, Obama will only do a debate that is structured for him to have the best chance to win.  Gingrich will never be president.  Do you not know the country?  He wouldn't get 45% of the vote. 

    • BobbyD

      Give us Speaker Moonbeam in a heartbeat.  He'll chase away anyone with any doubt that the Repbulican party is made up of crazy old white men.  I mean what a gift from heaven.  Won't even need to mobilize the dead people and get those illegals to vote.  The commies will rule for years.  WAtch out for the FEMA death camps.  They are coming.  Oh wait, that's death panels and FEMA intermnt camps.  Easy to get the conspiracies mixed up.  Sheriff Joe to the rescue.  Maybe he can be Sec of Defense. 

      • Mobley22

        Sheriff Joe is a better man than you. Why don't you go to AZ so he can put some pink panties on you teach you some manners.

  • Joe

    Newt will be gone shortly after Super Tuesday (today). He'll only win Georgia, if he wins there. Even with his gigantic ego in the way, he will see the handwriting on the wall shortly.

    Ron Paul will not drop out. He is in the race to win delegates, not states, so it won't matter to him whether he wins any states today or not. His supporters will keep sending him money and he will stay in the race all the way to the convention.

    • Joe

       Let me just add that as a Ron Paul supporter, I find all three of the other candidates unacceptable. If forced with a gun at my head to vote for one of the others, I'd probably pick Romney as I find him a little less scary than the other two. Both Santorum and Gingrich seem to be almost salivating at the thought of starting another war. I don't know what gets them so excited about bombing brown people, but it is clear that is the case. I'm sure Romney is perfectly willing to bomb brown people, too, but he doesn't seem to be quite as bloodthirsty as Newt or Rick.

      Fortunately, I don't think things will get so bad by November that I will literally be forced to vote for any of the above. If Ron Paul does not get the nomination, then rather than vote for the lesser of two evils, I plan to vote third party or write-in Ron Paul. I don't want to hear that that "is a vote for Obama." (a) it is not, and (b) even if it was, I am not convinced that any of the other GOP candidates would be an improvement over Obama. Romney would essentially be the same, and Gingrich or Santorum could conceivably be a lot worse. (If the GOP holds the house and gains the Senate, a bad Republican president with Congress behind him could do a lot more damage than a lame duck Democrat with a Congress determined to thwart him.)

      • Mobley22

        Enough said. We all know Romney is the most liberal least consistutional. So this makes Ron Paul and his followers frauds.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

    With the canidates in the race it is logical to assume a brokered convention.   Romney will take many delegates but, not enough to carry the first vote.   After that its any bodies game.   Who ever that will motivate the delegates will be the one to carry the Republican banner.    At this point I doubt it will be Romney because the other canidates are different enough from him that their people will not jump ship to Romney.    Santorum and Newt are close so that their delegates will jump to either side and Paul seems to along for the ride although he seems to have made a deal with Romney as I have not seen him question him either in the debates or through commercials.

  • James Bates

    I was baptized as a Southern Baptist. However, unlike Richard Land, I have read the book of Mormon and the book called the Koran. This is from the book of mormon " Therefore repent, and be baptized in the name of Jesus, and lay hold upon the agospel of Christ, which shall be set before you." I will guarantee there is nothing like this in the Koran. Anyone who says A man who belongs to "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints" isn't a Christian should read the gospel of Luke 11-23 where Jesus says "He who is not with me is against me". I'm not a Morman but I would trust Mitt Romney with my life. I can't say the same about Louis Farrakhan.  

     

    • Mobley22

      Trust Mitt Romney with your life? So do you like footprints on your face, or on the back of your head?

    • Mobley22

      Trust Mitt Romney with your life? So do you like footprints on your face, or on the back of your head?

  • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

    LMAO - doesn't matter at all because Paul will never drop out.

    The real question is when is Santorum and Gingrich dropping out so Paul can crush Romney.

    • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

       Exactly!

    • keyesforpres

      Yeah, he's got an agreement with Romney. Rand said a week ago that he would be honored to be Mitt's running mate. Hmmm.

      • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

         He has no agreement with Romney.  Both have said multiple times that this is not true.  Get you "facts" strait.

        http://youtu.be/jSVi45vfA6o

        • keyesforpres

          LOL.

      • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

        Paul has not agreement with Romney and has flatly said so.

        Paul is just smart enough to know not to spread his resources thin attacking everyone and Romney has enough support and money that he is going no where soon, that can not be said for Santorum and Grinch.

        So wasting money on Romney at this point is foolish. But well spent getting the Fakes Santorum and Grinch out of the equation.

        • keyesforpres

          Blah, blah, blah, lame defense of Paul. As usual, you Paul supporters make up some lame excuse for what he's done. He's not going to admit he has an agreement with him. Duh.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           Blah, blah, blah  <--Good alternative answer to actual logic and facts.

          The fact is:  There is no agreement.  Ron Paul has ads out attacking Romney.  He has had them since the beginning and he continues to have them.

          I didn't realize that Santorum and his cult were such conspiracy theorists... 

          http://r3voluti0n.com/ads/

        • keyesforpres

          AGAIN, Paul NEVER attacked Romney in the debates. NEVER. That is what I am talking about. I don't care about the ads.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           "I don't care about the ads"  So you ignore some facts, but not the ones that suit your position/beliefs?

        • keyesforpres

          He never went after him in the debates. I've seen those videos before. Pretty lame.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

          Why are all Santorum supporters so Nasty?  That is why I could never support someone like Santorum.  Most of his supporters spread lies and treat other people like garbage.  Not cool.

        • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

          That is the majority of Neocons not just Santorum supporters.

          They can not offer facts or or even generally be civil. They are just loud, rude, dishonest. Anything to get their way.

        • keyesforpres

          LOL. Was wondering how long it would take for a Paul supporter to use that anti-semitic term.

        • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

          Antisemitic? LOL Really and which term was that? Do you even know what antisemitic is?

          No you obviously don't.

        • keyesforpres

          Research what "neocon" has come to mean.  You sound like a skit from Sat. Night Live.

        • keyesforpres

          Nasty? Puleeze. You Paul supporters are the nasty ones.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           I know you are but what am I?

          Children

        • keyesforpres

          LOL, thanks for proving my point.
          Hugs and kisses!

        • Mobley22

          When Paul defends Romney does that make him a Romney supporter or a Romney defender? The position to be at this point is anyone but Romney or Paul.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

          Your argument is ridiculous. 

        • Mobley22

          Ok genious! So if Virginia,  where Paul and Romney are the only ones on the ballot, why is the liberal Romney shellac the libertarian fraud 3 to 1?

        • Mobley22

          Oh really? Paul said so himself? I won't trust anything Paul said any more than something Obama or Romney would said - 3 peas in a pod.

      • BobbyD

        Now that's an inspired way to lose the rest of the few moderates clinging to the Republican party.  Rand has just some awesome things on record to ensure whoever you nominate will lose.  WAy to go.  All those Hispanics and those women who are pretty pissed off at the moment.  Please push this.  Great idea.  God Bless

        • keyesforpres

          I'm not pushing this. I saw the article last week where Rand said he'd be honored. What is a moderate anyway? Oh right, someone who often votes with other party.

      • Kleetus92

         Uh oh... you mean... the only real candidate out there is a lying political hack?? Just like the ones he's proclaiming to be better than?

        Say it ain't so!

    • Mobley22

      Paul is irelevant. Either Newt or Santorum could win if the other dropped out. Paul is a non-factor. Which means that you Paul-bots are even less important than acrylic taffy - you don't matter.

      • keyesforpres

        LOL.

      • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

        My aren't you the delusional child.  

        Your pubescent ad-hominem 
        attack demonstrates your credibility perfectly though.

        Even those in the MSM you worship have openly admitted none of the so called "front runners" can win without Paul's support. It is pretty obvious that anyone who makes such a ridiculous claim that Paul has no foundation in reality.

        Simple Facts, though I doubt you have the ability to grasp them.

        FACT - No one can beat Obama without Paul's supporters period, you can cry and pretend otherwise all you like and it will not change that fact.

        FACT - Paul's supporters will not support anyone but him period, ergo only Paul can beat Obama.

        So since you have only ad-hominem and no real evidence to substantiate your claims you should go back to what you do best at, mindless attacks lacking substance.

        Have at it kid.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

           Incorrect Paul stand at 7% nationally.  If either Newt or Santorum droped out and the other got the votes you would have a single person getting between 55 to 65 % of the vote.   Paul becomes a stat and Romney loses.   Your logic is circular and therefore you are chasing your tail much like Paul does.

        • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

          Sorry wrong, such numbers are based on land lining polling. Provide polling numbers not using land lines and not using a small segment.  You can't because such polls always favor Paul and they can't have the only guy who would take away the gravy train getting more support than he already has.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

           You actually made absolutely no sense please take a moment think and respond again.   My Polls are very good being Pew, Rassmussen and Gallup.   They have been in error but considering all of them they do not have an agenda

        • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

          I made perfect sense, said polls mean nothing, how they are conducted means everything.

          That you do not understand this though is concerning.

        • Kleetus92

           Okay... so, um... why didn't paul win the last election... oh... that's right... you guys couldn't muster enough votes then either. or the time before that...

          Oh.. wait... I must have my facts wrong... yeah, I must be using faulty data, you know, like the ENTIRE WORLD.

          ron paul has clearly won every election he has ever taken part in, actually, even those he hasn't. He's sooo cool and soooo smart that his mind powers melt the voting machines so it only looks like he lost so he doesn't 'scare the neocons'.

          Wow... you people are worse than the obama supporters.

        • keyesforpres

          That is what is so pathetic about you Paul supporters with your, 'if you don't vote for Paul we'll stay home in the general". How utterly selfish of you. The goal is to get Obama out of office or there won't be another presidential eleciton. It's all about yourselves with Paul suporters.

        • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

          Nothing selfish about it, simply a complete unwillingness to settle for the lesser of two evils. You see we know that it is that willingness to compromise that has slowly destroyed our country. 

          You are right about getting rid of Obama but the other 3 White Obama's pretending to be conservatives are no better than the Obama we have now. 

          So why trade one for the other? Sorry we will not settle for another Obama, you can keep the one we have now or can be smart choose Paul and save our country.

          Think about this, the media is bought and paid for by corporate interests who also control the political elite. THEY want you to choose Anyone but Paul, that is why Paul is the ONLY one they are blacking out.

          If they want you to choose anyone but him then it is obvious he is the only choice.

        • keyesforpres

          Paul has said Islam is not a problem. NONSTARTER for me. He has done zero research into Islamic doctrine. I am sick of him slandering our troops and defending Iran. And please don't tell me he hasn't done that. He did it over and over in the debates. If only he would defend the US the way he defends Iran. He is a senile and clueless fool.

          He said in one debate that he did not see himself getting rid of Obamacare. He did not mean that it is Congress that has to overturn it (we know that). He meant he had no interest in taking a leading role in getting it overturned. He just acted like it was no big deal.

          Santorum is nothing like Obama.

        • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

          You may be afraid of boogeymen but we are not.  The people beating the drums of war know nothing about Islam.  While the professionals in the FBI CIA and other Intelligence agencies agree with Paul.  But you you never took the time to research that did you?

          Yes the men who spent their lives studying Islam and the Middle East who know it better than ANYONE else agree with Paul.

          You absorb propaganda like a sponge, here is some facts for you. Iran has not aggressively attack another nation in over 200 years. America has attacked 16 countries in the last 30 years alone. 

          How can you not understand you are being fed lies with that simple fact alone?

          Santorum is VERY much like Obama, you obviously have not looked at his voting record and only listen to what he says. Actions speak louder than words.

          I have some beachfront property to sell you in Nevada.

        • keyesforpres

          You stupid fool, Iran was behind the bombing of our troops in Lebanon in the early 80's. They were responsible for many of the deaths of our troops in Iraq. They declared war when they kidnapped our personnel at our embassy in Iran,
          Those of us that know Islam are not beating the war drums. That is why we want to get rid of Iran's nukes...to avoid be incinerated.

          You are just like your hero...blame America and defend Iran!

          You show the depth of your ignorance on Islamic doctrine.
          Most folks in the CIA were not too familiar with Islamic doctrine before 9-11. I bet most still aren't.

        • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

          Your an idiot,  your the very definition of the pot calling the kettle black.  America military and corporate military have committed far more acts of terrorism. 

          As to the attack in Lebanon that is nothing but speculation no proof at all, so try again.

          Present to me any evidence of Iran committing military aggression against anyone that is not purely speculation/assumption or misdirect.

        • keyesforpres

          You're just like your hero...bad mouth America and defend Iran. I see how you are able to support that clown.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rhonda-Reichel/1339255666 Rhonda Reichel

          and the Israelis were dancing in the streets as the twin towers fell....

          Not to mention the USS Liberty they tried to sink

          You are so stupid I can't stand to read any more of your lies

        • Kleetus92

           Um... You're off a couple thousand miles.... it wasn't Israel, it was Iran.

          Nevermind... you're voting for paul anyway.

        • keyesforpres

          The USS Liberty was a mistake. They did not deliberately attack us. 
          It wasn't Israelis dancing in the streets, it was the Fakestinians. One guy from Saudi Arabia said folks all across the country had camel barbeques to celebrate.
          It's Islam. Period.

        • Paintedmoose

           And if our troops were not in Lebanon, they would not have been bombed. If we were not in Iraq, no deaths there. No embassy in Iran, no kidnappings. Quite simple really.
          Bring all our troops home, use them to protect OUR borders, not the Pakistan/Afghanistan border (Dr. Paul's own words 3/5/12 Sandpoint, ID). Butt out of other countries' business. We are not the policeman of the world. How would this country have felt if other countries had meddled in OUR war between the states? That is exactly what we are doing in other countries.

        • Paintedmoose

           By the way, I did vote for Keyes, multiple times in the past. I realize now, the Dr. Paul is who we need to help us stop this freight train headed straight to hades.

        • keyesforpres

          Oh and do tell about all the folks that agree with Paul. Only the ignorant ones do.

        • justme
        • keyesforpres

          LOL. No thanks. Not interested in a Paul production.

        • jerry

           If
          Ron Paul is not our next president it may as well be Obama.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rhonda-Reichel/1339255666 Rhonda Reichel

          Slandering the troops?  They are his biggest supporters !

          Boy are you CLUELESS

          you have ZERO facts right....not one....why don't you immigrate to Israel....America needs less of fools like you

        • keyesforpres

          Ah yes, the "military supports Paul over the others". No they don't. It's just that those in the military that donate to Paul make a point of letting it be known. Most ppl in the military who donate to a candidate don't let it be known because they don't want to be used like the way Paul uses them with his false claim.

          You just let your disdain for Israel slip. Oopsie! I know it's hard for you Paul supporters to keep your disdain for Israel hidden for long. You are just like your hero.

        • gijoe

          lmao  not true

        • keyesforpres

          Yes it is. Research it.

        • 128517

          keyes, I think what Paul means about Islam is that true Muslims are not the problem, only the politically radicalized that USE their religion to get support.  Ron pauls words unify , and the illuminati s goal was to pit Muslims and Christians to fight each other... and we are following there plan so well

        • keyesforpres

          True muslims ARE the problem. Islam IS a political ideology. Religion is only an aspect of Islam. There is the Sharia. You know, where ALL women and ALL non muslims have zero rights. Are you aware that most of the world's hotspots are because of Islam? Do you understand that over 80% of the mosques in this country preach for our death and destruction? That IS Islam. How can you Paul supporters not know this by now?

          Did you know there have been almost 19,000 terrorists attacks since 9-11? All in the name of allah? Did you know that is what ALL muslims are taught? Did you know the Muslim Brotherhood had some internal documents that were discovered in a suspected terrorists basement in 1993 and those documents stated that their goal was to destroy us from within? Did you know that EVERY Islamic group in this country is a front for the Muslim Brotherhood? The Muslim Veteran's Association, The Muslim Student Association, and the Islamic Medical Society? Did you know that???

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rhonda-Reichel/1339255666 Rhonda Reichel

          No you are wrong..... dead wrong

          The goal is to get someone who will follow the constitution

          That IS NOT Romney, Santorum, Gingrich or Obama

        • keyesforpres

          Rhonda, the number one Constitutional duty of the president and federal gov't is to provide for the common defense. Paul wants to ignore the world. Shouting to the world "No more wars!", only emboldens evil ppl to attack.

        • justme

          ignore the world hmm I think not .  At this point we have created much hatred around the world because we are knowitalls.

        • keyesforpres

          As always, a Paul supporter shows their ignorance on Islam.

        • 128517

          No it doesn't.. because they are not attacking us. we are attacking THEM.  you are brainwashed by  liberal media

        • keyesforpres

          Another Paul supporter that supports Islamic terrorists and blames America. We weren't over there bombing when 9-11 happened. Do some research. Oh and the liberal media believes the same way you do...support the terrorists and blame America.

          You Paul supporters are as dumb as Obama supporters. Totally uninformed on Islam and totally unwilling to learn the truth. You make me sick.

        • justme

          right on Ronda

        • Delite Gaddie

          Rhonda, you have no clue about Romney's religious beliefs. Mormons support the Constitution of the US and have since the founding of the church  in 1830.

          The Consitution is part of our religion. Romney as a Mormon is required by his beliefs to defend the Constitution. He is no common Mormon. He has been a Bishop, a Stake President and even a home teacher assigned to look after several families in his ward.

          Mormons love America and believe in the Founding Fathers' ideas imbodied in the Bill of Rights and Declaration of Independence.

          Rest assured Romney will defend his country and its founding principles.

        • tatonkapark

           I'm not staying home, I'm going to vote for Ron Paul

        • keyesforpres

          ......

        • Spine

          Oh come on "guys" be nice.  Disagree like gentlemen, you'er not on the play ground any longer.  "Just sayin"  (as my middle schooler would say) . . .  :) 

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rhonda-Reichel/1339255666 Rhonda Reichel

        Ha ha ha .....lets just see how IRRELEVANT we are when you  NEOCON TURKEYS lose again like you did with John McCain

        Those other 3 morons can't pull the independents in like Paul....so long suckers !

      • 128517

        ha, that s interesting.  I like Ron Paul and I hate American politics and never voted. he is the first politician I trust and like.  It s his MESSAGE man.  It is good, unifying and real. You can trust that what he says he will do..  don't group all people into one bot thing or you make yourself a anti bot, bot.

    • http://www.facebook.com/tncdel Tnc Del

      LMAO!

    • Kleetus92

       You really are into that whole legalizing drugs thing aren't you? Ron Paul hasn't even won ONE state.

    • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/U4JKGP6V3Q3FN6RI66SG6GYMFU Sue

      Really a 75 year od Career Politican that has Only Gotten One Bill Co- Sponsored . I think he has been Overpaid Sir.  How many States has he Won . NONE  I respect several things - about Dr. Paul.  He is right they need to Audit the FED . You are So wrong thinking he Could Win the Election when he can't take a STATE. Or pass a bill on his own......   He is Best reasonating his message & then Retiring.  They Laughed about McCain being too Old - You want the Doctor with the Red Phone Saying What do you want ?    Seriously - that is not even gonna happen - Well Maybe on a Satturday Nite Live Skit

  • http://profiles.google.com/emagliacane Elaine Magliacane

    YES... and NEWT could beat him if Santorum dropped out... one of them is going to have to MAN UP and drop out otherwise Mittens will win.

  • Dodie1990

    Tha Ayatollah Santorum with his restrictive religious platform will never beat OBama in 2012. Not everyone in the country isrr eady for his intolerant restrictions on women. Sharia Law may be okay in Iran, but not here. His banning of birth control,Planned Parenthood, and stem-cell reserarch is extreme. His disagreement with JFk by wanting to impose his religion on all of us makes him unsuitanel to be President.  As a lifetime Goldwater Republican  ,I will never vote for him.

    • keyesforpres

      You are clueless. You are beyond uninformed if you think Christian doctrine is shariah law. Go get informed on shariah law.
      Santorum is not against birth control for others. He just doesn't believe in it for him and his wife. He has a very valid point that birth control made it easier for women to sleep around and it has destroyed the family. We have more out of wedlock births now since we've had birth control. Nothing wrong with him saying his opinion. If you were really a Goldwater Rep. you would understand that, but you are not.

      You need to research what JFK actually said and what Santorum said. What you said is not even close to what was said.

    • Mobley22

      Hey fool - what is Santorum trying to restrict - can you name anything, or are you just a stupid fool choking on cookie crumbs and drool?

  • Doodlebug

    I think he could beat Romney but he could NOT beat obummer. I wish people would put Newt's past behind and get him up against obummer. He's smarter than obummer on all counts. And, I don't think that Romney knows enough about foreign policy to go along with everyones idea that he is the best one to beat obummer. I'm afraid of that.

    • SilkyWiley

      Newt is damaged goods.  And conservatives should look closely at his record.  He sold out a number of times, not to mention the big check he got from Freddy Mac after he left congress.  It was payola for something.

      • Mobley22

        Yea, I think I heard that phoney coward Mitt Romney spouting something like that. Thanks for pointing this point. Mitt Romney has only done so 9 times today and not his usual 10.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

         And guess what Newt told congress on both sides of the aisle.  Split them up and dont give them any more money.   He was asked to do a study and he gave that answer obviously ignored.   Newt is the best answer at this point to Obama.   Paul would just blather and Romney would agree with Obama

    • Janismad

      How about a VP job? Just think Newt and Biden debating..

  • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

    Why would Ron Paul ever drop out?  Don't you know that we are second in delegates, next to Mitt Romney? 

    http://r3voluti0n.com/2012/our-secret-is-out-ron-paul-is-winning

    Also, according to national polls, Santorum and Gingrich cannot beat Obama, but Ron Paul can.

    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

    • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

       Did I mention that Santorum isn't even on all of the ballots?  He couldn't even get on the Virginia ballot.  He has no chance.

      Also, did you see the way Romney and Paul killed him in that last debate?  How could he ever think he could stand against Romney?  Romney lost to McCain who lost to Obama.  Santorum got his butt handed to him by the guy who lost to the guy who lost to Obama in the last debate.  He has no chance!

      • Mobley22

        Oh, really? And just what does your Ron Paul have a chance to do? To continue to coddle and foster the spread of sodomites across this land? To give move states more access to more abortions? To land nukes in our land? Yea, and Paul is a great debater, did you see that one where he tucked his little peanut head into his shirt collar after Newt slammed him for call the McVey bombing success?

    • keyesforpres

      Ron Paul is dead last in delegates.

      • mridens

        Keep listening to Faux News. 

        • keyesforpres

          LOL, as I have said before, you Paul supporters act just like Obama supporters. Must be those drugs you use that you want legalized.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           I don't want drugs legalized.  Ron Paul even says that drugs are bad and you are stupid if you use them.  The federal government has no authority here and the states should make laws pertaining to drugs and enforcement. 

        • keyesforpres

          Any drugs coming from south of the border is a federal issue. Commerce clause would probably apply as well as protect us against invasion clause.

        • Mobley22

          Not perfect, but better than listening to the lies and blather foamed about by Paul-bots!

      • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

         OK, keyesforpres...  Since you just don't get it, I will post the link again.  It is packed with videos that explain how the system works, since you don't seem to understand. 

        Hint: You have to actually click on the link and read stuff. 

        http://r3voluti0n.com/2012/our-secret-is-out-ron-paul-is-winning/

        • keyesforpres

          I don't care what you Paul supporters post. You act like nasty Occupiers.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           There you go again, grouping people together into categories.  Collectivism.  Racism is an ugly form of collectivism...  How about you treat everyone as individuals? 

        • keyesforpres

          Nah, just going by the way most of you act on these boards.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           most of you...

        • keyesforpres

          You need to shave. Ick!

    • Mobley22

      Another Paul lie from a lying Paul supporter. You are not second in delagates. And you're not an Iowa delegate either.

      • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

        LOL  Don't make me laugh.  I am a delegate.  You act like a child, spouting off with anything that comes into your head.  How could you possibly know if I am a delegate or not?  Really?  I am a delegate in Black Hawk County, Iowa.  Don't like that...?  I don't care.  You are just upset because your candidate is losing and you feel helpless. 

        Santorum and Gingrich are dead last in delegates.  Sorry buddy.   I feel your pain. 

  • Dagny

    Ron Paul is not going anywhere.  He is not going to drop out.  And he is picking up delegates, more than Newt and Santorum when you factor in that the majority of those chosen so far for these candidates are Ron Paul supporters.  And, the only reason Romney is ahead is because of voter fraud, plain and simple.  He will lose to Obama if the GOP continues to shove him down our  throats.  Santorum  is not going to get picked even though the GOP has given him votes that belong to Ron Paul.  This whole election process is a scam.  Voter fraud everywhere.  Even if no one voted for Romney, he will still win.   Santorum is only being thrown in just to try to give the impression that we should take this election process seriously.  What a joke.  The corrupt GOP establishment  cares not about the voter integrity process, only about keeping their globalist agenda going.  Let's see how they make out when they are up against ACORN and the other scammers out their from the liberal side - corruption vs corruption.   It makes no difference who wins because America will lose.  Sadly, America is going down because people are buying into this facade of smoke and mirrors.  There are no choices, this is only an illusion.  The winner  has already been picked by these corrupt elitists.  I personally, will not vote for anyone of them.  I will write in RonPaul's name and the hell with their agenda.  Either way, it makes no differenced which party wins since they are all crooks. 

    • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

       I am an Iowa delegate.  We go to our county conventions on the 03/10 this Saturday.  You better believe Ron Paul has most of the Iowa delegates.  Santorum has next to zero. 

      • mridens

        Way to go Jason!

      • keyesforpres

        What say you about Paul's disastrous stance on illegals?

        http://www.numbersusa.com

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           Ron Paul wants to secure the U.S. borders with Armed Troops.  Much more practical than a fence. 

        • keyesforpres

          What about the rest of his bad grades?

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           Ron Paul was the ONLY candidate to get an A+ from Gun Owners of America

        • keyesforpres

          Well good for him. He's good on that issue. Guess he'd have to be what with him being ok with Islamic immigration and not wanting to deport illegals. Need a gun to defend oneself.

        • Mobley22

          But he is not smart enough to understand that our greatest threat is not a ground invasion, but a balistic missle or ICBM.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           Yeah, and since we don't have any ballistic missiles or ICBMs of our own, without troops all around the globe, we would be all killed off in no time.  Ron Paul is dangerous...  /Sarcasm

          Wake up! 

          Ron Paul is the only one who understands what is going on.  Your argument makes no sense.  If the threat is not on the ground and the threat is missiles, what good is having troops on the ground?  We have missiles.  We have radar.  We have satellites.  We have allies.  We have spies.  We have intelligence.  We have technology.  We monitor everything.  (WE HAVE THE BEST OF ALL OF THESE)

          When you have a real argument, bring it.  Until you do...  well, I am waiting.

        • Mobley22

          Or how about Paul's stances of abortiono and the sodomites - both of whom he hapily supports. He is a disgusting liar.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           more lies.  Ron Paul is 100% constitution and 100% pro-life. 

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           lies

        • keyesforpres

          You really are sad. You Paul supporters are like rabid dogs. You refuse to get informed and just repeat the same bs on your senile hero.  Those are Paul's stances on illegals. You are so similar to Obama supporters.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           lies

        • keyesforpres

          If that is what makes you feel better, you just go along with that. Now run along and finish your bong.

    • keyesforpres

      Really? I voted for Santorum and would NEVER vote for the clueless on Islamic doctrine Ron Paul.

      • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

         Your vote for Santorum means nothing if you are not a delegate for Santorum.  Got it?  Good.  We win, you lose.  Thank you and have a nice day!  ;- )

        • keyesforpres

          Typical nasty Ron Paul supporter. You are as bad as Obama supporters. One thing that makes me hate Paul more than anything are his obnoxious supporters.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           OK, first of all, I am posting facts... You are posting a bunch of opinions.  Just because you are wrong and I am right, doesn't mean I hate you.  If I hated you, I wouldn't waste my time.  Second.  I am nothing like a Obama supporter.  I don't believe in "sharing the wealth" or mandates.  Third.  If you had to deal with people who spread misinformation, myths, and lies all day long, you would get a little grumpy too. 

          Do you know how hard it is to be a Ron Paul supporter, standing up for liberty and the constitution in a country that has strayed so far from its roots...? 

          We have the corporate owned bought and paid for mainstream media telling lies, blacking out, and covering up the truth.

          We have people telling lies

          We have warmongers who will kill innocent women and children to push their agenda without a second thought about life

          We have people who will support abortion funding/supporting candidates like Romney and Santorum and then call themselves pro-life

          We have name callers in all the comments

          People who ignore logic, repeating anything they hear on the brainwash tube

          Election fraud

          ---

          You try to stand for liberty and the constitution once.  Being a patriot is difficult... 

        • keyesforpres

          I'm sure it's exhausting for you Paul supporters. What, with the way you troll for article on Paul and spend your days "defending" him. Spend some time learning about issues. Get away from the Paul sites for awhile and learn something.

          Santorum did not vote for Planned Parenthood. He voted on a bill that had funding tucked into it for Title X funding. That happens in every bill. At least Santorum didn't sneak in a bunch of earmarks and then vote no on the bill knowing it would pass anyway so he could say, "Look, I voted no". Santorum was honest about his earmarks. Paul was not.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

          The way you troll for article on Paul and spend your days lying about him.  Spend some time learning about the issues.  Get away from the Rush sites for a while and learn something. 

          Ron Paul always votes against earmarks.  You don't understand how earmarks work, obviously.  If you don't take the money, it is used somewhere else, for something you may be against.  If you don't support them, you vote against them (as Paul does) but if they pass anyway, and you are stupid not to take the money and use it for what you believe in, versus having it be used for something you may be against by someone else.

          Santorum says he is pro-life, yet he voted to fund Planned Parenthood.  I don't care what else was in that bill. Christians don't vote for abortions. Nothing is more important than innocent lives being lost. Hypocrite. 

          Santorum wants to take away contraceptives, yet claims to be against mandates.  Even though it is my right to have intercourse with my own wife without having 25 children I cannot financially support.  Hypocrite. 

          Santorum claims to be a conservative, yet he voted to raise the debt ceiling 5 times.  Hypocrite. 

          Santorum is a fake conservative.  Santorum is a fake Christian.  Santorum is a real hypocrite.

        • keyesforpres

          You really are stupid. Repeating yourself over and over.
          I didn't troll for this article, I get godfatherpolitics in my inbox daily and this was one of the articles. I NEVER troll for Paul articles. I can't stand him
          You are just like the left, repeat the same lies and hope it sticks. You know Santorum did not vote to fund Planned Parenthood. Keep smoking your pot or whatever hard drug you are obviously using.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

           Obviously by your speech and your picture you are a child.   So who ever has been feeding you this garbage should be arrested for maltreatment of a minor.   You really dont listen Paul delibarately plays games with earmarks he is a liar and dishonest and the frosting on the cake a true loon

        • Mobley22

          You are posting a pack of lies not worth time responding to - whcih by the way makes you a very good Ron Paul follower.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           You are posting a pack of lies and conspiracies not worth time responding to whcih by the way makes you a very good Santorum cultist.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

           No after 30 years conspiracies are Pauls area of  expertise along with "the military industrial complex" such a load of crap for such a long time.

        • soupson10

           Not obnoxious, just very DEDICATED.

        • keyesforpres

          Yeah, dedicated to trolling for Paul articles and then turning ppl off to Paul.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           Dedicated for trolling for Paul articles then telling a bunch of lies about Paul to turn people off to Paul. 

        • keyesforpres

          Oh go back to your mommy's basement. I don't know how your wife can stand you.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

           Yes the brown shirts in nazi Germany had the same blank gaze

      • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

         Islamic doctrine?  Is the U.S. constitution Islamic doctrine?  You are making yourself look stupid.

        • keyesforpres

          No, you are making yourself  look like an Obama supporter with the way you are acting.
          Have you not watched Paul in the debates? He doesn 't know anything about Islamic doctrine. He thought the Ground Zero victory mosque should have been built. That is what muslims do after they attack, they build a mosque on top of the rubble.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

           No however his reading of the Constitution does not have the morals and ethics given us by the founding fathers.   He is totally amoral not caring which way or that.

    • Mobley22

      You people lie just like Ron Paul. He is not picking up delegates. He is in last place!

      • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

         OK, now it's my time to bust you out.  Iowa has not given any delegates yet.  Neither has Minnesota and many others.  So were are you getting your misinformation?  I will tell you...  you are either guessing or you are lying.   The GOP doesn't even know who has which delegates.  Neither does the media. 

        The only reason we know a little more than you, the GOP, and the media is because we had a plan.  We are well organized.  In the beginning, Ron Paul supporters knew we were going after the nomination by grabbing delegates.  Straw polls don't win the nomination.  We all arranged to hang out after the caucuses and become delegates.  If there were 5 delegate slots in our precinct, even if we lost the straw poll (caucus poll) we all volunteered to be delegates.  Then we reported our available slots and how many Ron Paul supporters filled those available slots to the Ron Paul campaign.  That is how we know the outcome.  That was our strategy.  That is how I know what I am talking about and you don't have a clue.

        http://c3244172.r72.cf0.rackcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/paulcodelegates4.png

  • Reelman1946

    I posted that a week or 2 ago...about 132 delegates each (tie) if Newt and Paul drop out...the whole issue here being missed for months is the 4 left have a lot of major overlap in their basic positions...thus the dragging on split of conservative votes...its that simple.   It will not matter because the personal pain of toxic secular socialist utopianism trumps bold lies daily...J. Carter Obama cannot tell us the sun is not in the sky and there is no moon at nite...he will try, boldly and often though as the fawn media changes his diapers...we flush in Nov.  Mark it.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_PTIF6KGUK7QASUBRKKR5A6LM2Q Tod

    Dr.Ron Paul 2012  for the ONLY man running that Loves Our Country,are Rights,and Freedoms !!! Paul's Not Going ANYWHERE ,BUT TO THE WHITE HOUSE Even if We have to write him in. Myself I've gotten 11 people so far this year that are going to vote for the first time just for Paul,and plan of finding a lot more before Election time!

    • keyesforpres

      Did you see where Paul actually said he did not see himself being president nor did he see himself pushing to get rid of Obamacare?

    • Mobley22

      Paul is the most liberal of all the candidates, including Romney.

  • keyesforpres

    LOL. Paul conservative? NOT! He's to the left of Obama on national security.
    The number one job of the federal gov't is to provide for the common defense. National security. Paul is clueless to Islamic doctrine. He's terrible about illegal immigration too.
    http://www.numbersusa.com

    • mridens

      Wow, you are pretty far out there.  If the keyes in your name refers to Alan Keyes I have a real hard time understanding how you got from there to here.

      • keyesforpres

        Really? You should go to http://www.alankeyes.com and read an article of his in Dec. He talks about Paul is lacking in morals and decency.

        • soupson10

           Clearly keyes does not know what morals or decency is.  You are talking about a man who stands firm on the Constitution of this nation and has been marries to the same woman for 55 years.

        • keyesforpres

          By morals, he wasn't talking about Paul's sex life. He is talking about things like Paul slandering our troops and bad mouthing Israel.

        • Mobley22

          And what about Paul being a huge sodomite supporter. I'm sure he'll get the log cabin vote. Disgusting, imoral man.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           You don't know what you are talking about.  Ron Paul supports individual liberties.  He is against collectivism. 

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

          Again, you are confused.

          Ron Paul has never slandered the troops or badmouthed Israel.  Ron Paul voted to allow Israel to bomb Iran's nuclear sites while the other "republicans" voted against it.  Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate who supports Israel's sovereignty. 

        • keyesforpres

          I've heard him slander our troops. If you don't understand that justifying 9-11 by saying they did it because we are over there bombing them isn't slander than you are too thick to be reached.

          You are a liar that Paul "allowed" Israel to bomb Iraq. Israel didn't ask our permission to do what needed to be done.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

         If you knew Rev Dr Alan Keyes you wouldnt he does not like Paul either.   Very wise man knew him from the Reagan Administration.   Along with Jack Kemp (RIP) he did not like Paul at all called him an evil little man and he was right.

        • Mridens

          Hmm, I've spent most of the last ten years focussed on raising my young family but if what you say is true then I will have to find a new use for the frame holding the Certificate of Appreciation Dr. Keyes gave me in 2000. 

    • mikec711

       Please take a gander at the following questions:
      1. With what cash are we planning to keep the war machine running?
      2. Do you believe that "they hate us because we're free" and that it has nothing to do with our repeatedly invading their homeland, setting up puppet governments and keeping military bases there?  If you answer Yes to this ... would you be OK with some other nation invading us, setting up a puppet gov't for themselves, and replacing our military bases with theirs?
      3. Do you know that only one of the presidential candidates served his country?  Can you guess which one?
      4. Do you know that the military support one candidate more than all the other candidates combined?
      5. Have you served in a combat zone?
      6. Do you have any immediate family who will be deployed to a combat zone if the war machine continues to roll (note, immediate family does not include your co-workers nephew)?
      7. Do you know the term used for folks who never served, who claim to "support the military", who are against Ron Paul, and who want to keep the war machine rolling?  (you got that right!!!  Chairborne-Ranger)

      Our military men and women disagree with you on who has is clueless on foreign policy.

      • keyesforpres

        That is a lie about the military supporting Paul. Very few do, it's just those that do make a point of noting it on their contribution towards him.  Most folks in the military don't let it be known that they are in the military when they make their contribution. Paul gets less than 1% support from the military.

        You make an announcement to the world that we can't afford anymore wars and that will embolden them to attack because they think we won't do anything.

        It is 1400 years of Islamic doctrine that is the problem.

        Read the book , "Muslim Mafia"
        Save these to your browser and read:

        http://www.jihadwatch.org
        http://www.atlasshrugs.com
        http://www.actforamerica.org

        It is basic Islamic doctrine that they are taught they are to fight us until Islam rules the earth. We are considered to be the aggressors for simply being alive.

        • mikec711

          Interesting that it's a lie and no other candidate refutes it.  Exactly where does your 1% come from?  Want to take a gander at any of the other questions?  Are you willing to go make visits to the bereaved families of our service members to tell them that you're glad their loved ones died honorably in your war?  If it can ever be proven that our not invading another sovereign nation caused an attack on us ... I would be willing to visit victim's families to say that we could had to follow what our founding fathers said (interestingly, their policy of nonIntervention was just over 200 years ago ... I wonder if they had no idea of what happened 1200 years earlier).  So please provide rank and unit of service that you or an immediate family serve(d) in ... or provide model of LaZBoy from which you choose to send our service members into harms way.

        • keyesforpres

          Here's an article explaining that our Founders were not noninterventionists. Remember, our first war after our founding was the Barbary War.

        • keyesforpres

          Here's one article explaining the Paul myth about military donations.

          http://floppingaces.net/2012/01/05/ron-paul-myth-military-donations-favor-the-crazy-ol-uncle/

          I also think your comment is despicable saying that I am glad a loved one died in "your war". Despicable.

          I have a better idea. Why don't you apologize to those wounded military men and women. Apologize for you candidate who slanders them everytime he justifies jihad because of what our military has supposedly done ( you know, when he says "because we're bombing") even when we weren't.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns
        • keyesforpres

          ron paul is a liar. He is also despicable the way he uses the military to say they donate to him. Most ppl in the military don't indicate they are in the military when they give donations because they don't want to be used the way Paul is using them. Claims they give him the most money and then says the jihadist are attacking us because our military is bombing them. He disgusts me even more by doing this.

        • keyesforpres
        • mikec711

           Ron Paul is not an isolationist.  He wants honest friendship and trade with any nation willing to to reciprocate.  Interesting that I'm saying do NOT put the service men into harms way, you are saying put then in harms way ... and you think I should make the rounds to the bereaved families (when they could have been alive if we didn't have a war-monger is president the last 30 years).  So Dr. Paul is not an isolationist, he is just one who serves (and I'm still waiting for rank and branch from any of you war-hawks).  Wearing a "God Bless America" TShirt as you watch American Idol from the comfort of your home does not mean you support the troops.  And I ask again, since the military provides more financial support to Dr. Paul than it does to all other candidates combined, he is the only vet in the bunch, I can provide tons of video showing vets passionately supporting him, and no candidate questions him based on the facts, why can't you guys accept that.  Why is your war-hawk candidate who never served and has no idea what it's like to be in harms way (like you guys apparently) not contesting Dr. Paul's statements.  Is it because they get 1/10th or less the financial support from the military (although they get far more from Goldman Sachs).  Rant on guys, if you believe you know what you're talking about, having never been there, if you believe our brave service men and women have to die for your disagreement with our constitution and founding fathers, if you believe a vet doesn't understand as well as a chairborne ranger ... rant on.  The floor is yours, I've got work to do.  And keep repeating to yourself, "They hate us because we're free."

        • keyesforpres

          Paul is despicable the way he bad mouths our troops. Stop defending his despicable comments about our troops. He emboldens the enemy when he blames us.

          I'm not saying put our troops in harms way. I am saying that you announce to the world that you aren't willing to fight a war because it is too expensive, you are more likely to get attacked. Duh.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           Ron Paul has NEVER bad mouthed our troops.  You are a warmongering liar.  Ron Paul has never blamed the troops.  Maybe you have stock in the military contractor companies...?  Do your stocks go up when we go to war? 

          Why did the Soviet Union collapse?  It was because they went bankrupt.  They did it to themselves.  Ron Paul is the ONLY one who seams to understand this and will save our country before that happens... if it's not already too late.  Wake up!!!

          Just because you ignore this, doesn't mean it isn't true.  Do you really believe the other countries don't know we are broke?  This was the agenda of Bin Laden. You are only pushing his agenda to bankrupt this nation with your policing the world and nation building.

        • keyesforpres

          He badmouths our troops everytime he says 9-11 happened because we were over there bombing. We weren't over there when 9-11 happened. We had a base in Saudi Arabia at their request, but no bombing. That is slander against our troops. He also lied and said our troops killed over 100,000 Iraqis.  That was a lie.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           And we never over-through an elected government and installed a dictator in Iran, destroying their economy and oppressing their people for 20 years.  We never installed Al Quada in Libya either.  Sure. 

        • keyesforpres

          Oh I agree that what Obama and Carter did was wrong. It does not justify flying planes into our buildings. It doesn't justify muslims butchering all the Christians they have been butchering or butchering other muslims. Muslims have killed millions of muslims just since WWII.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

           It is hard to try to reprogram robots.   It seems that they can not have alternatives therefore are stuck in a rut no reasoning, no logic just rants and raves mimic's of Pauls delusions.

        • keyesforpres

          They are truly robots. That is for sure. They just deny the stuff that actually comes out of Paul's mouth and say it isn't true or they try to tell us what he really meant.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           Ron Paul is not an isolationist.  Your candidate wants to be a king, and think he has the power to declare wars without the congress.  Following the constitution and the checks and balances is not isolationism.  Wars should be declared by the people, fought, won, and over. 

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           People are going to die in these wars.  Women, children, young men...  War is not to be taken lightly.  Innocent people are going to die!!!

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

           And your advice is to bury your head in the sand until they bite us in the butt instead of taking it to them.   Real Smart

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           There you go again, putting words (lies)  in other people's mouths. 

          You declare war, win it, get out. 

          If you want America to collapse like the Soviet Union did, keep pushing your corrupt agenda.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

           Hardly lies that is your and Pauls position.  Russia had a food problem twice once in 1917 and again in the 80"s.    You Paulbots are very ignorant but, then again you were programed by a loon so the nuts dont fall far from the tree

        • keyesforpres

          Never said war was to be taken lightly. I don't want any wars, but you announce to the world that you won't fight any more wars...guess what? It emboldens evil ppl to attack.

        • Bill Polhemus

          The other candidates don't spend a lot of time refuting the things Paul says. It's like trying to argue with the guy yelling at traffic on the downtown street corner.

          What's the point?

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           This is the point:

          http://www.politifact.com/texas/statements/2011/jul/23/ron-paul/ron-paul-says-members-military-have-given-him-far-/

          The point is, your opinion does not line up with the facts... as usual.

          Just more lies from neo-conservatives like Rick Santorum.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

           Well s8it for brains I have made the visit have you???  I doubt it the way you talk like a robot with no sense.  I told them what I knew happened and what was going on.   I told them the Kurds were highly greatfull that we had stoped the systematic genocide of them and gave them a number to call some that lived in the area.   Now why dont you provide the same information ???

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           You are nuts.  Ron Paul gets more donations from active duty military than all of the Republican candidates combined, nearly twice those of his GOP rivals, also including Obama.  These are facts, not opinions. 

          http://www.ronpaul2012.com/2012/02/03/ron-paul-military-donations-nearly-twice-those-of-his-gop-rivals-and-obama%E2%80%94combined/

          http://www.dailypaul.com/215374/troops-march-on-white-house-for-ron-paul-rtamerica-video

        • Bill Polhemus

          No. He CLAIMS to, but that means nothing.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           No, the donations don't lie.  Neither do the military personnel that marched on the White House last month for Ron Paul... all on video.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

           I could get more people for a weenie roast all military.  Several hundred say 400-500 out of 28 million.  I could get a least a thousand out and I am not even running for President

        • Mobley22

          You're citing his own websites. You are very foolish. If you look up you will see gullible written in the sky. Ron Paul is a liar.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           Actually, http://r3voluti0n.com is my website, not Ron Paul's website.  You are incorrect again. 

          Here is a fact checking website:

          http://www.politifact.com/texas/statements/2011/jul/23/ron-paul/ron-paul-says-members-military-have-given-him-far-/

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

           That is just silly you can not be serious quoting Pauls own propaganda to confirm his lies

        • Mobley22

          Paul has a serious lying problem.

        • keyesforpres

          He lies as easily as he breathes.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

          Santorum says he is pro-life, yet he voted to fund Planned Parenthood.  Hypocrite. 

          Santorum wants to take away contraceptives, yet claims to be against mandates.  Even though it is my right to have intercourse with my own wife without having 25 children I cannot financially support.  Hypocrite. 

          Santorum claims to be a conservative, yet he voted to raise the debt ceiling 5 times.  Hypocrite. 

          Santorum is a fake conservative.  Santorum is a fake Christian.  Santorum is a real hypocrite.

        • keyesforpres

          He didn't vote to fund Planned Parenthood. He voted on a bill that had funding slipped in for Title X. There isn't a pure bill out there.

          You are a liar. He does not want to take away contraceptives. He says he personally does not believe in it for himself. If you were as informed about the Constitution as you Paul supporters claim to be , you would know that the president cannot dictate such things. Well, unless you are Obama.

          As for raising the debt ceiling, that was just about everyone.

        • TheChristianSolution

          For someone who is calling others a liar, you sure are weasling around with the truth.

          If Santorum voted for Title X with Planned Parenthood funding in it, then he voted for Planned Parenthood. He should have had it taken out or voted down the bill until it got taken out.  LIFE ---- IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN ANYTHING ELSE!  

          ---Weasel hypocrite.

          President cannot dictate things? Then why get so worked up about Ron Paul being President.

          ---Weasel hypocrite.

          Everybody does it?  Including Santorum.

          ---Weasel hypocrite

        • keyesforpres

          Oh my, you are such a Christian. LOL.

        • TheChristianSolution

          I don't understand your response. Alan Keyes is staunchly anti-abortion. He would NEVER have voted for a bill that contained funding for Planned DEATH.  Santorum did. Makes Santorum a supporter of Planned DEATH. 

          Ron Paul is NOT a supporter of Planned DEATH.  Fairly black and white here, unless you weasel around with wording.

          That is why I support Ron Paul. He never weasels around with the truth.

        • keyesforpres

          He is a weasel. Slandering our troops claiming they'd killed over 100,000 Iraqis when in fact, it was terrorists who killed most of those Iraqis.

          Santorum did not vote for funding of Planned Parenthood.

          Paul puts earmarks into bills and then votes no on the bill knowing the bill will pass. He is a total weasel.

        • TheChristianSolution

          Weasel for changing the subject. The subject was Santorum funding Planned ParentDeath.

          Before you said he voted for Title X which had Planned ParentDeath funding, now you are saying no.

          Really Keyes guy, are you really going to equate the morality of a House of Representative member who earmarks needed maintenance of the Intercoastal Waterway in his Houston district and then vote AGAINST it!   And then have the audacity to compare that to Santorum funding the killing of babies?

          If that is the best you can do, I think this tread is getting nowhere. Have a good day.

        • keyesforpres

          Oh you fool, Santorum did not vote for funding abortions. He voted on a bill that Title X fuding tucked into it.
          What things has Paul voted on that had tucked into that he did not agree with? Or did he spend his time snoozing in his office?

          He's the weasel. Claiming to vote no on bills and bragging about it. He never admitted to putting those earmarks in until he got caught. And his double dipping on travel is pathetic.

      • Bill Polhemus

        Do you have the slightest clue as to the proper and generally accepted definition of these words:

        invading, puppet, military base, combat?

      • Mobley22

        1. Why is your candidate pro-sodomite?
        2. Why is your candidate pro-abortion?
        3. Don't you realize that putting all of our troops along the border will do nothing to stop a missle?!!

        • mikec711

          1. Pro Sodomite.  Please explain
          2. Pro Abortion. Please explain
          3. This one is easy, we have 900 military installations in 130 countries (fortunately we're flush with cash so this is not draining us of money we don't have) ... and it did nothing to stop 9/11.  Arguably, it helped cause 9/11.

          But as to the first 2 lame assertions ... Dr. Paul is a doctor who has delivered hundreds of babies (many for no money since he did not accept Medicare but provided the service anyway.  But in contrast, when polled, none of the candidates was willing to put a federal regulation in place forbidding people from hitting themselves in the head with a hammer.  Thus, by your logic, they are all pro-"hit yourself in the head with a hammer."  I will make all you GI-Joe's a deal .. if you honestly answer my first 7 questions to the guy who slammed Dr. Paul (knowing less about him than I do about ballet) ... I will answer all of that person's questions.  Thus far, I can only assume I'm dealing with people who have never served (much less in a combat zone), who don't care that the military puts their $s behind Dr Paul instead of their war-monger never-served candidate, feels that we have trillions to spend on the war machine, wants to keep the war machine going ... thinks nations have no right to be upset at us when we invade, pop up a puppet gov't, and keep military bases in their nation (and while I missed the episode of Jersey Shore where they explained all that to you ... I will be happy to explain with examples all of the above ... to anyone who answers with honest the first 7 questions.  So now I have answered some questions (absurd as they were) ... if someone actually answers some questions ... I'm game ... otherwise, bash on and remember, American Idol watching definitely classifies you as an expert on foreign affairs.  So I don't have that level of expertise as I don't watch American Idol (or Jersey Shore).

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

           Wrong.   Most military has no one person they support.  It varies across the spectrum.  And as for money there are many ways to give money that does not record where it comes from it matters what the amount is.  I have people that I trained in over 15 posts in the US, 5 in Europe and several in the middle and far east.  There is no ground swell for Paul so sorry nice illusion but it is just that.  And I am considered in some quarters a expert in foreign affairs it does not come in an instant and all out comes must be realized.   Paul is  ignorant by his own words about foreign affairs.  Blaming us for 9/11.   In truth any one who has studied history realizes that the muslims have to come at us it is part of their religion and that has been going on for over a thousand years and millions of people killed because of it. 

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           Wrong:  We all know that not everyone in the military supports any one candidate.  That is just common sense.  But the fact is that Ron Paul gets far more support from the military than any of the other Republican candidates including Obama. 

          Ron Paul never blamed us for 9/11.  The CIA blamed our foreign policy.  Don't shoot the messenger.  Ron Paul is not blaming you and I or our troops.  He is pointing out that we can not go around the world, propping up dictators, overthrowing elected governments, installing dictators, killing innocent civilians (women and children) and not expect any repercussions.  If you believe otherwise, you are naive.  The CIA calls this blowback.  Again, Ron Paul didn't invent this term, the CIA did. 

          http://www.politifact.com/texas/statements/2011/jul/23/ron-paul/ron-paul-says-members-military-have-given-him-far-/

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

          It is not a fact unless of course you have been drinking the kool-aid which Paul distributes freely.   And yes Paul has stated that we are to blame .   And of course his numbers on the unfortunate civilian deaths have been lies so sorry.    And of  course you have fought in war I rather doubt you are the one fooled and naive if not out right ignorant .   And what the  CIA describes as something and you take that label and slap it on what you want.  

        • Mobley22

          Ron Paul responds "SURE" to the question "Do you support sodomite marriage?" See the vidoe below at 2:01 ff.

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJz81lAwY0M

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

          More lies from the neo-conservatives. (Fake Conservatives)

          1. Pro sodomite?  Really?  Ron Paul is pro constitution.  Nothing more, nothing less.

          2. Pro abortion?  Since when?  Ron Paul is 100% pro life.  Unlike Rick Santorum, Ron Paul did not fund Planned Parenthood.  Ron Paul is an OBGYN doctor who wrote a book defending his pro-life stance.  Ron Paul has delivered over 4,000 babies and never committed ONE abortion.  You don't get any more pro-life than Dr. Ron Paul M.D.  The others are all talk.  Ron Paul walks the walk.

          3. Number 3 is laughable to say the least!  "Troops on the border will do nothing to stop a missile"  How many missiles have came flying across our borders?  Those crazy Mexicans and their missile launchers. 

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

           Hardly lies just read all about libertarians.   You will find them as bad as if not worse than Obama except in fiscal matters .    Obama would give you nothing and Paul would give you everything it simple a matter of what libertarians believe in.   Also care to explain that in 2010 Paul met with Frank and 14 others (9 of which were directly linked to Soros)  they came to an agreement on trying to reduce 200.000 troops, 50 billion from the defense budget, retire 57 ships including 2 air craft carriers and hiking the cost of health benefits to vets.   More recently he met with Frank on getting pot legalized on a Federal level.   Just like his anti-earmark position where he would put his pork in bills sure to pass then vote against them.  His abortion stance would be that the states can do anything they want to just like the Articles of Confederation that is why we have a Constitution instead of the Articles.   Paul and libertarianism is chaos and anarchy

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           jong, collectivism is not cool. 

        • Mobley22

          You support anarchy. Stop acting like your position (the position of pot-heads,  sodomites, and baby killerrs) is the high ground.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

           And the founding fathers thought that some order must be mantained  for all.   This of course was after they tried the Articles of Confederation and that is what Paul wants no government.   You talk of collectivism you have no real idea of what you are talking about.   Nice sound bite but, that is as far as it goes.  You might want to stop drinking the kool-aid and get an education .   Paul and Obama are the same coin the same result one with restrictions the other will give you what ever you want both have a null result

        • Mobley22

          Ron Paul responds "SURE" to the question "Do you support sodomite marriage?" See the vidoe below at 2:01 ff.

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJz81lAwY0M

    • soupson10

       I am finding that too many people do not know what Ron Paul actually stands for.  Thank you mainstream media.  Ron Paul would be using our troops to monitor the borders of this country.  We need our troops protecting this land.
      Ron Paul 2012

      • keyesforpres

        He could have gone on Fox the other night for the debate where each got equal time and answered questions one on one, but he refused to go.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           Equal time for Ron Paul?  lol  You are living in a dream land.  They NEVER give Ron Paul equal time. 

        • soupson10

           Ron Paul has been on many debates.  It is very interesting when he is on the debates.  The other candidates tend to be very quiet and listen intently as he has a great deal to say that is extremely important regarding our position in history at this moment.  I suspect that equal time was given after they found out Dr. Paul would not be attending.

        • keyesforpres

          Uh no. The forum was each candidate came out alone and was asked questions by three ppl and then three more ppl came out and each asked a question. Each candidate answered all the questions. Each candidat got the same 6 ppl to ask them questions. It was a wonderful opportunity for Paul to explain his positions and he refused to come.

        • soupson10

           Have you not watched any of the other debates or were you relying on only this one?  I do not blame him Fox news is disgustingly bias.  Everything Ron Paul is about is on you tube and on Ron Paul 2012

        • Mobley22

          Ron Paul is disgustingly bias, except he is disgustingly bias in favor of sodomites and abortions.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           more lies from Mobley22

        • Mobley22

          Ron Paul responds "SURE" to the question "Do you support sodomite marriage?" See the vidoe below at 2:01 ff.

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJz81lAwY0M

        • keyesforpres

          I"ve watched a number of the debates. I cringed when Paul blathered on and on at the Iowa debates. I couldn't understand how anyone could support him after that.

          Biased? Pathetic. They had three citizens from Ohio that asked their personal questions and three public figures asked questions. If Paul is so great he should be able to answer any of the questions and set them straight. Right?

        • Mobley22

          Wrong - they look like they are listening only because it is usually hard to believe the crap he is saying. Sort of like when people listen to a sea shell or the sound of a toilet flushing.

    • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

       Left of Obama?  Are you confused?  Is the U.S. Constitution left of Obama? 

      Santorum, Romney, and Gingrich all agree with Obama that the president is to declare war, just as a king or dictator would.  The constitution doesn't give the president authorization.  The people are to declare war.  That is why we have checks and balances, to make sure the president doesn't turn into a dictator.  Obama, Santorum, Gingrich, and Romney are all the same on this.  It's not right or left, it's wrong.

      Ron Paul is right again.

      • keyesforpres

        Oh, I agree that going into Libya was unconstitutional. The only way a president can do that is if there is an immediate threat to the homeland and then it is only good for 90 days and must then be put for a vote to Congress. Libya would not have qualified.

        Paul is to the left of Obama. He believes we should come home and ignore the world. He makes me cringe everytime he blathers on and slanders our troops and justifies what the jihadist do. Sickening.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           Ron Paul doesn't want to ignore the world.  Ron Paul wants to trade with other nations, talk with them, try diplomacy first, guard our borders with armed troops, and build our economy.  If we need to go to war, we declare it, win it, and come home. 

          Maybe you cringe because you are a warmonger...?  Ron Paul does not justify jihadists.  He only explains their motivation, by the same definition as our very own CIA.  The CIA introduced the term "blowback", not Ron Paul.  Don't shoot the messenger.

          Ron Paul understands the difference between Al Qaeda and the Taliban.  Most people (including the other candidates) do not.  Al Qaeda are the terrorists that come over here to harm us.  They are the same people we are propping up in Libya.  The Taliban are only people trying to keep us off their own soil.  That is why they fight us. 

          Ron Paul is only trying to educate the people.  He is right. 

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqdH6y4-8xU

        • keyesforpres

          Uh huh. Many in the CIA don't understand Islamic doctrine either. Surely Paul could do  some actual research into Islamic doctrine and TAQIYYA.

          The Taliban are killing us for the same reason al Qaeda is: Islamic doctrine. It's all about killing the infidel and establishing an Islamic caliphate. They believe they go to heaven if they kill us. It's in the koran. Are you aware that over 80% of the mosques in this country preach for our death and destruction?

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           Yeah, the CIA doesn't know what they are doing.  HA HA  That is their JOB!!!  They know.  It is their job to know.  Oh, let me guess... You think you know more than the CIA? 

          Everything you say is laughable.   You are a real comedian!!!!!!!!

          ;- )  Thanks, I needed a good chuckle.  You made my day.

        • keyesforpres

          Most guys in the gov't haven't researched Islamic doctrine.
          Many don't understand the doctrine of taqiyya. You have no interest in getting informed. You are the typical Paul supporter...spend your days trolling for Paul articles and you get your news from Paul supporter blogs,etc. 

        • TheChristianSolution

          The CIA does not know about Muslim Taqiyya?  I have to agree with Jason that you are silly in thinking that our CIA knows NOTHING about deceptions.

          It is their job to know about deception. They have dealt with lying deceitful double agents from the Soviet Union long before we ever started worrying about Muslims.

          But I'm sure you can get an appointment at Langley to inform them about all the intel you know that they do not know.  NOT!!!

        • keyesforpres

          Read, "Muslim Mafia".

        • TheChristianSolution

          Why don't you send a copy to the "dummies" in the CIA you believe are clueless. Me, I would tend to believe that our CIA is just the American branch of the Mossad.

        • keyesforpres

          Yup, I knew your anti-semitism would come through.
          You are an anti-semitic pig. You are sick to call yourself a Christian.

        • TheChristianSolution

          You you want me to tell you of the time that the Mossad lied to our CIA?  Or are you just one of those who believe the Jews crap is always unsmelly kosher.  I am here to counter blind people like you.

        • keyesforpres

          You are a hateful anti-semite. Utterly a piece of garbage.

          You hate all things Jewish for simple reason you hate Jews. You must belong to the new "Christians" that hate the Jews.

          You attribute one thing done by someone who happens to have a Jewish surname to all folks that happen to have a Jewish surname.

          You are utter filth.

        • TheChristianSolution

          Impressive name calling. The Jewish MSM may have need for you.

        • keyesforpres

          I rest my case.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

           No he is wrong the muslims however love him for his hate of Israel .   They would love to have him over Paul would loose his head over his new friends after all he still is a unbeliever

      • Mobley22

        Paul is a self-seving, pandering fraud.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

          Yeah, supporting life and liberty is self serving.  Giving back a portion of your congressional pay to the treasury every year is so self serving.  So is passing up paid junkets. 

          Are you finished with the lies yet?  You are the only one who is self serving.

      • Mobley22

        Why do you think he stands for the constitution? Because he says he does? Since when is it constitutional to ban sodomy and promote sodomite lifestyle?

        Ron Paul responds "SURE" to the question "Do you support sodomite marriage?" See the vidoe below at 2:01 ff.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJz81lAwY0M

        • TheChristianSolution

          You are not even responding to what is being said.  Talk about a mindless robot!

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_K7OQZ4MDK7Q37IGKLSIQP27DOM Arky

      Paul is actually closer to Eisenhower on national security.  His crack against Michelle Bachmann saying she hates Muslims did it for me with Ron Paul. His attacks on Santorum calling him a phony were nasty too.  Santorum is not being paid by taxpayers as he campaigns - Ron Paul is.  Make Ron Paul look like someone living off taxpayers.

      Santorum can beat Obama.  the others cannot.   The Dems want Romney.

      • keyesforpres

        Don't forget how Paul was double dipping on his travel expenses. Getting money from the taxpayers AND a private group.
        He called Santorum a fake and it was disgusting, childish, and VERY unpresidential.

        He is playing folks for a fool. He runs for president for the money.

        • soupson10

           They found out that was just another lie in the smear campaign against Ron Paul.  They have tried and tried to find dirt on Ron Paul.  There isn't any.  Shocking in this world but true.  In reply to your statement that Ron Paul has smeared our troops.  That is an out and out lie.  He served in the military.  Stop believing the lies and investigate for yourself.  Ron Paul is the only man who stands for the Constitution.
          Lets stand with him before we lose it.

        • keyesforpres

          I have seen him blame our troops. He blamed us for 9-11 in the 2008 SC primary debate. That is when I first heard of him and said, that that would be a guy I could never support.

        • soupson10

           Wrong again.  Ron Paul blames our foreign policy.  How can you make comments without actually knowing what the man says and don't say you do because it is obvious you do not.

        • keyesforpres

          A big part of our foreign policy is our military. You don't think he's bad mouthing our military when he blames 9-11 on us bombing over there? Hm??
          He's despicable to blame us for muslims doing their jihads. Had it with his bad mouthing this nation and siding with jihadists and Iran. I have heard him enough in the debates and interviews. He makes me sick. Spare me the "I don't understand him". I understand him perfectly.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           Keyes, Our military is not a policy.  That makes no sense.  You don't know what you are talking about.

        • Mobley22

          I think you should download a Paul-bot programing update - you seem to be running out of thinks to say other than sheer gut-stuck refusal and blind eye acceptance.

        • keyesforpres

          Of course it's part of our foreign policy. Well, according Paul it is what with us supposedly "bombing over there" as being the reason 9-11 happened .

        • TheChristianSolution

          Some group in America let millions of Muslims into America -- FACT

          Jews let Muslims into America -- Either FACT or You get called an anti-Semite

          Muslims did 911 - Either FACT or Jewish False Flag

          America does not throw out any Muslims out of America after 911 - FACT

          Instead, America goes over to Muslim countries surrounding Israel, especially Iraq under non-Muslim secular rule and not associated at all with 911, and start bombing them all back to the dark ages - FACT.

          So Alan Keyes supporter, what is the ordinary man on the street supposed to believe is true and what is lies?

        • keyesforpres

          Oh geez. You are the anti-semite I went round robin with a few weeks ago. Not interested in talking to you. Buh bye.

        • TheChristianSolution

          Weasling around with the truth includes not addressing the truth.

        • TheChristianSolution

          I've been reading your posts.  Good job.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           Keyes, you are such a liar!  I have followed Ron Paul for many, many years.  He has NEVER blamed us for 9/11.  Give it up.

        • keyesforpres

          Bull crap. He blames us all the time. Everytime he opens his pie hole and says they did it because of our foreign policy, he blames us. I heard him say in 2007 or 08 in the SC debate that they did it because we were over there bombing. My God, have you not listened to anything coming out of that dottering old fools mouth?

        • keyesforpres

          Here's just one in a long list. Not to worry though, you'll say that that isn't what he meant.

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuX73Ixqtbg

        • Mobley22

          You're not a deligate. You are far to ignorate and wrong on just about everything. Ron Paul repeatedly says and continues to say over and over again that USA caused 9/11. Do I have to shove the footage of this under your nose too?

        • Mobley22

          Exactly - he supports Romney to justify running 3rd party. He wants Obama to win so he can continue to look like he is doing something useful.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           More lies. 

          Ron Paul "wants" Obama to win?  HA HA HA  You are a funny little liar.

          Ron Paul is not running for congress again after this, so please tell me why he wants Obama to win...?  You are a clown.

        • Mobley22

          Tell me why you support the pro-sodomite candidate:

          Ron Paul responds "SURE" to the question "Do you support sodomite marriage?" See the vidoe below at 2:01 ff.

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJz81lAwY0M

        • TheChristianSolution

          Quit trolling this for the 500 hundreth time.   It's making you look bad.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           Actually, this is also a lie.  Man, you guys never quit do you?  You can't find anything against Paul, so you make up stuff like this...  even if it were true, this is all you got on him?  Really?  Pathetic! 

          On the other hand, you have Santorum funding abortions with Planned Parenthood, raising the debt ceiling 5 times, supporting the bailouts...  This is terrible!

          Oh, no!  Ron Paul supposedly "double dipped" on travel expenses.  Never mind that Ron Paul gives back a portion of his pay every year and will not participate in the Federal pension other Congressmen will receive.  Never mind that Ron Paul always votes against earmarks...  Let's start a rumor about something that isn't even proven.  Something insignificant even if it were true.  http://r3voluti0n.com/2012/ron-paul-exposed-flying-first-class-on-congressional-trips/

        • keyesforpres

          He did not fund abortions. He voted on a bill that had funding for Title X in it. No bill is pure.
          Paul stuffs bill with earmarks on bills he knows will pass and then votes no on the bill so he can say he voted no.

          He refused to answer questions about the double dipping.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

          Incorrect.

        • keyesforpres

          Well, that is what Rick said and I believe him. He does not support abortion.

        • TheChristianSolution

          Rick Perry is your source for truth?  Man you need to get out more.

        • keyesforpres

          LOL, no I was talking about Santorum.
          I can't stand Perry and his open borders stance.

        • BobbyD

          The double dipping on expenses was TOTALLY proved false and I'm not a Ron supporter.  Look it up.  Bogus as other stuff you guys dredge up.  Try fact checking. 

        • keyesforpres

          No it wasn't. Paul's office refused to answer any questions.

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           Incorrect again Keyes.

        • keyesforpres
        • Mobley22

          Why do you hate facts. That's why we call you Paul-bots. It is supposed to be an insulting term you know.  Someone who only repeats like a robot and resuses to think.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

         You have no idea what Ike stood for do you??  you might want to look up Dulles

  • LarryN

    If Santorum wins the nomination Obama wins the election.

    • Mobley22

      Wrong. If Romney wins it will be GOP maybe winning, if Santorum wins it will be GOP landslide. Once you have a candidate nominated who can actually articuate conservatism then he will get the oportunity to say whatever needs to be said to put all the jackasses in their place. Romney will not do this because he is half jackass.

  • SilkyWiley

    Well maybe, but Santorum can't beat Obama.  No one can but Romney and he has the credentials to navigate the country out of this fiscal crisis.  Santorum is like the "church lady" judgmental and focused on sin.  Accept the country as it is, they won't go for Santorum.  So do you want Obama out or not?

    • keyesforpres

      Yeah, Romney will be so great with his Romneycare and wanting to get it in all 50 states.
      Did you see where Pam Bondi of Florida said she will work for Romney if he wins and put Romneycare in all 50 states? He's no different than obama. Romney thinks state gov'ts can do whatever they want. NOT.

  • ThomNJ

    The open primaries in some of these states is ridiculous in my view - why allow independents and democrats to vote on our candidate - when they will likely not vote for our candidate in the general election?  Additionally, by the time the primary gets to New Jersey, for example, we don't have much choice left.  The last time, it was pretty much done by the time it got here.

  • mikec711

    You can bet the SEIU and the rest of the unions would love to see a Santorum/Obama general election.  It's a win-win.  They'd be giddy to have 2 presidents who are against right-to-work and have shown that they are willing to take orders from the unions.  I'll have a no-thank-you helping of that general-election please.

  • dbassd

    Is your delegate  tally Whacko, or what?  Paul has more grass roots support than any candidate, and if he does not get the nomination, we will have him run 3rd party, or write in.  What is a GOP to do?  How about stop bashing him and give him the support that the people of the military and the youth are giving him.  He wants to stop the war.  Who does not agree with that?  
    How about the Military-industrial complex that is fomented by the GOP?
    RP for 2012!

    • Mobley22

      Why do you support a pro-sodomite, pro-abortion, pro-getting nuked anarchist?

      • TheChristianSolution

        Why do you lie so much?

      • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

        pro-sodomite = false
        pro-abortion = false
        pro-getting nuked = false

        Do you have any more lies you would like to share? 

  • Tlcschnauzers

    Just saw results of replacement of Holder by "conservatives"  Shows 50/50 split, First you can't have 50 % "conservatives" willing to keep this person in the top cop in the nation's position.  If so, our future is doomed by really stupid electorates

    • repubnut

      Don't believe the NEWS MEDIA POLLS !!!  They're trying to save Holder,,,Impeach HOLDER  !

    • Mobley22

      Most of Mitt cabinet picks would be wishy wasy rinos like himself. He won't put any hardcore conservative people in important positions because he isn't even any kind of a conservatie (except a wanabe one) himself.

  • repubnut

    I believe if Santorum & Paul would drop out --Newt could beat Mitt & Obama  !!!

  • SamualAdams

    Why isn't Santorum like Bachmann dropping out for the good of the conservatives?
    Romney has so many investors, just like the Psudo-president that these investors will cost the American tax payer billions. Just like BO's investors like Solyndra cost us millions.
    Can we afford all of Romney's investors when the election is over, a lot of them are homosexual investors, others appear to be similar to anti-2nd amendment soros or sorass. 

    • Mobley22

      Interesting. This makes sense. I haven't heard anyone talking about this yet, but we should be.

  • robjh1

    Nope.

  • SamualAdams

    Why isn't Santorum like Bachmann dropping out for the good of the conservatives?

    Romney has so many investors, just like the Psudo-president that these investors will cost the American tax payer billions. Just like BO's investors like Solyndra cost us millions.
    Can we afford all of Romney's investors when the election is over, a lot of them are homosexual investors, others appear to be similar to anti-2nd amendment soros or sorass. 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_K7OQZ4MDK7Q37IGKLSIQP27DOM Arky

    Paul is friends with Romney.   Santorum can beat Romney if Gingrich is out or if the GOP/RNC would stop trying to rig it for RomneyCare aka McCain 2.

    To win a GOP contest you need get out the vote (GOTV) volunteers.   GOTV volunteer are conservative and usually Church going Christians.  The only person these people will volunteer for is Rick Santorum.  Without these people you lose.  Don't tell me Paul BS because without GOTV you lose.    I liked Paul until he attacked Bachmann and Santorum.   Also Paul is friends with Romney.  Paul is right about the fed and not getting into wars.

    Santorum is the best choice at this point because Romney will lose in November and Newt's negatives are off the charts.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_K7OQZ4MDK7Q37IGKLSIQP27DOM Arky

    Why is Ron Paul pals with Romney?  Why does Paul attack people like Bachmann and Santorum when he fawns over Obama and Romneycare?   Why is Ron Paul campaigning while he is being paid by taxpayers?  Seems a bit hypocritical.

    • TheChristianSolution

      Ron Paul is a nice guy. What makes you think Ron Paul is not a pal of Santorum or Bachmann? 

      This is politics. Romney is not pretending to be a conservative (much), but Santorum has all but turned himself into a Christian Televangelist and Bachmann turned herself into a Jewish Jihadist. 

      Ron Paul, the REAL FISICAL CONSERVATIVE, clearly has to counter a FAKE FISICAL CONSERVATIVE or you will vote for him, for the wrong reason.

      Romney is relatively honest about his leftist, big government views and if you like his leftist views, then that is what elections are all about.  Why would Ron Paul spend his precious dimes campaigning against the leftist Romney? Romney's own campaign is enough to keep him from being elected.

      But honesty is always the number one goal in elections.  Dishonesty always has to be rooted out -- Or we get fake conservative Bushes and fake Messiah Obamas.

      • Mobley22

        Ron Paul is a self-serving, ever-pandering, lair.

        • TheChristianSolution

          Looking in the mirror again Mobley?

        • Mobley22

          You are a sickening fool. You call yourself the Christian solution and yet you repeadly defend terrorism and endorse sodomittees.

      • Mobley22

        Ron Paul responds "SURE" to the question "Do you support sodomite marriage?" See the vidoe below at 2:01 ff.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJz81lAwY0M

        • TheChristianSolution

          Heh Thanks Mobley!   Great Ron Paul video as always.

          Growing up I will always remember everyone saying "While I don't like what he says, I will defend his Constitutional right to say it."

          When talking about liberty, Ron Paul has extended this fundamental concept. He  says, "While I don't like what he DOES, I will defend his Constitutional right to DO it"

    • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

      Well, maybe because when you are running against somebody, you have to defeat them...  So why did Paul attack Bachmann and Santorum?  He obviously needed to defeat them.  Why is Ron Paul campaigning while he is being paid by taxpayers?  Really?  You can't be serious...  is that all you got?

      • Mobley22

        Your not a delegate from Iowa and that's not your website. You, like Ron Paul are a famous liar.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_K7OQZ4MDK7Q37IGKLSIQP27DOM Arky

    Really?  Paul is correct that we should be for America - not Israel, Saudis etc.  He was a joke when he bashed Bachmann saying she hates Muslims on Leno.  he wanted to suck up to the hollywood libs who love the islamics.  

    • TheChristianSolution

      Ron Paul tries his best to not hate groups. He went after Bachmann as an individual, because she was clearly "racist" toward Muslims and in the pocket of Israel, not America.   Bachmann would say "God Bless Israel", before she would ever say "God Bless America".

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

         Well how do explain that both HAMAS and Hezbollah both have come out in support of Paul????

        • Mobley22

          The real question is could they pull themselves away from Paul enough to back Obama in the general election, or does Paul continue to win the support of every terrorist organizatoin even over Obama. I say they continue to support Paul over Obaama because in this respect he is certainly to the left of Obama. I know, I know, you poor deluded Paul supporters think that he is actually conservative and actually a constitutionalist - but that is why you Paul supporters are poor deluded chumps.

        • TheChristianSolution

          You keep calling others deluded, but everything you have said in your last 25 posts is deluded.  I think you are looking in a mirror.

        • TheChristianSolution

          What's to explain? They are not Americans.  They cannot vote in our elections. They cannot fund our political campaigns.

          It is as silly as me saying that Israel endorsed everyone running but Ron Paul.   OK, not so silly, as that country actually does influence our elections.
           

        • Mobley22

          No its not as silly as saying who Israel endorses. Israel is not a terrorist contry who is trying to attack us. At first I thought you Paul-bots were just stubron, but not it might actually be the case that you are not very bright.

        • TheChristianSolution

          Hey Mobley, one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. 

          Hamas and Hezbollah are not countries first off, so they be definition cannot be a terrorist nation. These groups are in fact trying to get their nation back from the Jews who infilterated under cover of the British mandate in violation of international law.

          Israel does not have to commit terrorism against us, because they own us.   Now there are some who say that 911 was Jewish Terrorism, camofluaged as a false flag, to anger us into blowing apart the Middle East.  I have no facts one way or another if Israel was involved, but it would not surprise me in the least. 

          Can Jews be terrorist?  Absolutely!  Before the Israeli coup d'etah in 1948, there were quite a few Jewish terrorists. As one example, Rahm Emanuel's father was a Jewish terrorist in the Irgun.  Once you have won, you want to discourage terrorism. 

          We have had Jewish terrorist organizations here in America. Ever heard of the Weather Underground?

          And I know for a fact that the John Brown terrorist group in the Bloody Kansas raid at Harper's ferry were a Jewish Terrorist organization. 

          John
          Brown's closest advisers, fresh from being kicked out of Europe after the 1848 Judeo-Communist Revolution was put down, were:

          Jewish Terrorist Theodore Wiener, from Poland;
          Jewish Terrorist Jacob Benjamin, from Bohemia; and
          Jewish Terrorist August Bondi, from Vienna.
             

        • Mobley22

          terrorist loving, sodomittee sympathizing fool. Stop hiding behind your idolotrous crosses as if you were promoting a Christian worldview. You're not. You a phoney.

      • Mobley22

        It is really disturbing that Ron Paul  and his supporters really have no moral backbone. You will do and say whatever you think will help your agenda whether true or not. Most disgusting here is your pandering use the Christian religion, Christian sentiments, and Christian symbols when your message really has nothing to do with Christianity at all. Why is your candidate the pro-sodomite candidate? Why is your candidate the pro-abortion candidate?

        • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

           No real moral backbone?  More lies.  I am a born-again tongue talking saved Christian.  Santorum voted for abortion.  Ron Paul is 100% against abortion.  Give it up.  You are a liar.  What does the Bible say about liars?  Jesus said, Go and sin no more...  not lie and lie some more.

        • Mobley22

          In your warped view does tounge talking mean lying? Santorum never voted for abortion. Ron Paul defends it and defends sodomittee mariage in the video clips I posted above. Listen to them stop believing and spreading lies (including your tounge talking ways).

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_K7OQZ4MDK7Q37IGKLSIQP27DOM Arky

    Really.  Ron Paul is good friends with Romney.   He is like McCain in attacking conservatives.  I liked Ron Paul but his attack on Michelle Bachmann was disgusting and a pander to Islam.   Santorum is the best choice.

    Rick Santorum is the best choice. 

    • TheChristianSolution

      Bachmann was an IDF Jihadist.  I was happy for Ron Paul to have done that.

      • Mobley22

        Two can play your asinine name calling game. So then Ron Paul is a Gaza Strip Jihadist. Ron-Ron-Romadan -

        • TheChristianSolution

          You should not make fun of the poor unfortunate souls locked up in the Gaza Strip Concentration Camp.

        • Mobley22

          Now you are a terrorist sympathizer too? True Ron Paul supporter colors coming out. Supporter of sodomittees, supporter of terrorists; enemy of USA.

    • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

       Yes, Rick Santorum IS the BEST choice...  He is the best choice for Mandates, Spending, Debt Ceiling Increases, Bailouts, and Unconstitutional Wars!  Go Rick Santorum!  Screw the constitution!  It's just a piece of paper anyway.  Who needs freedom of religion, assembly, press, petition, speech, arms, a fair trial, or any of that nonsense.  Santorum will give you his religion.  Why make your own choices?  I don't care if you are married, you are going to have unprotected sex.  Why?  Santorum said.  Mandates are a great thing.  If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator. - George Bush the Lesser

  • Mobley22

    When Paul-bots are asked to explain why their alleged champion of the constitution will not criticize the most unconstitutional of the lot, Mitt Romney, a typical answer is that he is waiting for a one on one with Mitt Romney and then he will emerge as the clear conservative winner. Really? Well you have exactly what you are asking for in Virginia with Romney and Paul, the only two candidates on the ballot, 1 on 1. And what is happening? Paul is getting shellaced by Romney 3 to 1. So what is the real reason why Paul wants the most liberal candidate to win the nomination? It is most likely because this will give Paul better justification for going 3rd party which has been his intent from the start.

    • TheChristianSolution

      I'm a highly-technical  Paul-bot (pun on the technical robotics terminalogy), and what you say "Does not Compute".

      There is a simple answer for the simple-minded.  Ron  Paul does not have to spend his precious campaign contributions against Romney trying to show how liberal he is. Everyone already knows that.

      You just want his to waste his money going after a known liberal, so he cannot expose the fake conservativeness of your candidate. 

      • Mobley22

        I use the term "bot" in Paul-bot not because you're technical, but because you all are non-thinking - like a programed robot. How much does it cost to call a spade a spade or call a liberal a liberal in a debate - nothing. So start being honest.

        • TheChristianSolution

          The irony of what you say Mobley is that Ron Paul supporters are actually the least robotic and brain-washed programmed voters out there.

          Everything you have mindlessly been saying is robotic. Even using the term Paul-bot is you mindlessly repeating what you have heard elsewhere.

        • Mobley22

          fool

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_K7OQZ4MDK7Q37IGKLSIQP27DOM Arky

    Wrong.  Ron Paul attacked Michelle Bachmann saying she hated Muslims.  He called Santorum a phony.  Why is Ron Paul being paid by taxpayers to run his campaign?  He is a bigger phony by taking taxpayer money while running for office.

    • TheChristianSolution

      Ron Paul was as right about Bachmann as Rush is right about Sandra Fluke being a slut.

      Michelle Bachmann was a Jewish Jihadist.  She was all for putting America's Christian military under the command of the Jewish IDF.

      In fisical matters, Santorum is a phoney -- A BIG-GOVERNMENT PHONEY.

      • Mobley22

        Michell Bachmann is not jewish you fool.

        • TheChristianSolution

          Geez!  OK!  Fine!  Michell Bachmann is a Christian Zionist Jihadi.  Happy now.

        • Mobley22

          No, it doesn't make me happy that like your disgusting leader, you disgusting Paul-bots never stop to slander and tear down ever real and respectable conservative candidate as if no one can dare be conservative or constitutional other than that clown Ron Paul. He has done more diservice to the cause of conservatism and the constitution than either Obama or Romney.

        • TheChristianSolution

          No Mobley, the problem is that you cannot find more than a small handful of "Conservative" politicians who are really serving your needs.  I know you are full of faith, and I know you really want to beleive what they tell you, but time after time, they disappoint you.

          You know it's true. Gingrigh let you down when he was Speaker of the House and you really want in your heart to believe he is different now. Same with most of the others. Santorum will let you down and Romney will automatically let you down since he is what he is.  In this race, there is only one you can trust to do what he says, and that man is the most conservative in the last half century, but you watch too much of the wrong news, or you do not properly filter out the garbage.  It is hard to do, I understand.  I was "lost" for many years myself, jsut like you.

      • Mobley22

        Ron Paul is a phoney - a socially liberal, sodomittee embracing phoney

    • TheChristianSolution

      Where do you see that Ron Paul is accepting federal matching funds? 

      From what I read, he is the ONLY one who has refusesd them.

      http://www.haphi.com/funds/federal_matching_funds.html

  • Annwkingsley

    Do you really think Ron Paul will endorse Santorum? Santorum is against Libertarianism, the philosophy of Our Founding Fathers. It is about as hard for a Ron Paul voter to relate to Santorum's social weirdness and seeming fiscal and economic incompetence as it is to relate to Obama's. I'm an Evangelical Christian, and I have a hard time with this myself. I do not believe Santorum is a second choice for Ron Paul voters. Gingrich voters would probably vote for Santorum. Ron Paul voters are probably more likely to look at Fiscal and Economic Conservative Gary Johnson as an alternative. Although Gary Johnson and Ron Paul do not share all of the same views on policy, they do share most policy in common. I doubt Ron Paul voters will vote Republican for president, if Ron Paul is not on the ticket.

    • Mobley22

      You Paul-bots have no shame and you lies have no end. Libertarianism was NOT the philosophy of our founding fathers. Our founding father certainly did not ever envision or intend a goverments where it was declared unconstituional to make laws against sodomy. Our founding fathers were not pro-sodomite like Ron Paul. So rewriting history you disgusting people.

      • TheChristianSolution

        Mobley,  How many times can you be wrong and still hold your head high?

        Our Founding Fathers never gave the federal government ANY authority to determine the day-to-day social and cultural mores of the people living in the States.

        The 14th Amendment, NOT the Founding Fathers, changed the Constitution to state that the States now had to give all the citizens living inside their State,  the same rights that the federal government was to give the people.

        And the 14th Amendment ALSO gave the Federal government the authority to tell the States, for instance, to stop segregating blacks and whites.

        Most of this federal intrusion did not happen right after the 14th but after the 17th, when the State rule over the U.S. Senate was killed.   Another aspect of our government that the Founding Fathers NEVER created.

        • Mobley22

          How many time will you strut around with all your idolatrous crosses and hold your head high while defending the sodomittees. Disgusting drone.

  • Dmatthews

    Wrong Question -- Better, can either beat Obama?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

     No they did not go bankrupt they controlled the economy and dictated prices and controlled all facets of life just ask a person that lived under it.   They fell because the lack  of food

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

     Right.   You are going to tell one of the great Republican leaders that helped Ronald Reagan to success that he does not know what he is talking about.   Meanwhile Paul has been drooling like a moron for over 30 years.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

     And your ignorance confirms that Paul is a loon.

    • TheChristianSolution

      Who are you talking to?  Yourself?

      • Mobley22

        Take that cross off your picture. You don't stand for the Christian cause. You are a deludged anarchist fool.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NLORN6B3ZNGCAJTFHWWFUUEY4Q jong

     They said the same of the nazi's

  • Peter

    I love it how the, self proclaimed, moral supporters of other candidates have no problem lying and slandering Ron Paul. 

    It appears that they don't actually read or obey the commandments of the God of the bible which means their "God" is someone else.

    • Mobley22

      So is God in favor of sodomites getting married? No. Ron Paul responds "SURE" to the question "Do you support sodomite marriage?" See the vidoe below at 2:01 ff.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJz81lAwY0M

      • TheChristianSolution

        Heh Thanks Mobley! Great Ron Paul video as always.

        Growing up I will always remember everyone saying "While I don't like what he says, I will defend his Constitutional right to say it."

        When talking about liberty, Ron Paul has extended this fundamental concept. He says, "While I don't like what he DOES, I will defend his Constitutional right to DO it"

        • Mobley22

          Apparently you like any video that advances the causes of the sodomittes. You and your views are disgusting.

  • Thissong

    the real question here is, which Republican can beat Obama? Fortunately, we don't have the same miserable ' lesser of two evils" choice this year ( between Obama and McCain). With the exception of Ron Paul - who has zero chance of beating Obama, or getting the Republican nomination - the remaining 3 candidates would make good presidents; even though they may not be true conservatives.  Ron Paul would best serve the nation by dropping out NOW and not even consider running as an independent, which would only hand the White House back to Obama on a silver platter.

  • Mobley22

    Video footage that Ron Paul is pro-sodomite:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Wdh_jDPM9Ns

    • TheChristianSolution

      Heh Thanks Mobley! Great Ron Paul video as always.

      Growing up I will always remember everyone saying "While I don't like what he says, I will defend his Constitutional right to say it."

      When talking about liberty, Ron Paul has extended this fundamental concept. He says, "While I don't like what he DOES, I will defend his Constitutional right to DO it"

  • Mobley22

    Ron Paul responds "SURE" to the question "Do you support sodomite marriage?"

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJz81lAwY0M

    • TheChristianSolution

      Heh Thanks Mobley! Great Ron Paul video as always.

      Growing up I will always remember everyone saying "While I don't like what he says, I will defend his Constitutional right to say it."

      When talking about liberty, Ron Paul has extended this fundamental concept. He says, "While I don't like what he DOES, I will defend his Constitutional right to DO it"

  • Mobley22

    Ron Paul responds "SURE" to the question "Do you support sodomite marriage?" See the vidoe below at 2:01 ff.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJz81lAwY0M

    • TheChristianSolution

      Heh Thanks Mobley!   Great Ron Paul video as always.

      Growing up I will always remember everyone saying "While I don't like what he says, I will defend his Constitutional right to say it."

      When talking about liberty, Ron Paul has extended this fundamental concept. He  says, "While I don't like what he DOES, I will defend his Constitutional right to DO it"

      • Mobley22

        So you too are admitting that you support sodomittee mariage? You are no friend of doing what is right. Coward.

  • gtx13

    Don't worry about ! First of all , Newt has no reason to Drop out, because he is only one valuable  Conservative in the race ! The second; The both, Romney and Sennatorum will be severely beaten by Obama ! Only Newt is able to win against the all kind of liberals ! You know who is Newt as politician and practician !

  • Mobley22

    Ron Paul says over and over that 9/11 is USA's fault. Here is one of many:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuX73Ixqtbg

    • TheChristianSolution

      Heh Thanks Mobley! Great Ron Paul video as always.

      Growing up I will always remember everyone saying "While I don't like what he says, I will defend his Constitutional right to say it."

      When talking about liberty, Ron Paul has extended this fundamental concept. He says, "While I don't like what he DOES, I will defend his Constitutional right to DO it"

    • PatriotDiva

      Ron Paul was referring to the unintended consequences of our military actions around the globe. It's a term called "blowback" coined by the CIA. If you had done your research, you would know this, but obviously you have some bone to pick with Ron Paul. I guess the 22 in your moniker is your I.Q.

  • RUBY

    IF IT DOES HAPPEN IT WILL BE THE SAME THING AS LAST ELECTION. HE WILL LOSE THE ELECTION JUST LIKE LAST TIJME.....................RUBY

  • Mobley22

    Ron Paul supporters - I just want to make sure that you understand that your Ron-Paul legalized dope won't be free. If you want free dope, which many of you may, you should either look for it from Obama (he might add dope-stamps to his food stamp program) or from Romney (get your medical MJ with Rombama-care). Paul, Romney, Obama - all similiar and all liberals.

    • TheChristianSolution

      Are you ignorant about Ron Paul or do you just have evil intentions to misrepresent his views. 

      More that letting people have the liberty to do what they feel they must do for themselves, Ron Paul would not be FORCING anybody to support ANYBODY'S ANYTHING, if the Constitution did not support it. 

      • Mobley22

        No, I'm sorry to say that I'm not ignorant. I was flirting with supporting Paul before I learned more about his liberal views. Liberal view? Yes, in this link Ron Paul the liberal libertarian argues for legalization of herion, prostitution, and sodomite marriage - see 2:01 for Paul embracing sodomite marriage.
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJz81lAwY0M

        • TheChristianSolution

          You need to watch your own youtube insert because Ron Paul clearly says that government should get completely out of the marriage business.  (and out of the business of indoctrinating our children, and out of the business of health-care charity, and out of the business of being the policemen for non-Americans living outside America)

          Oh, you don't like govenment getting out of marriage  either because we would have anarchy you say?

          No, people would get married in their church and would associate with like minded people. If you wanted to associate with those people, you would have to live your life in a way they are comfortable with.  But, if you chose to rebel against societal norms, you suffered the consequences by being shunned by society, in work, in acceptance at stores, in acceptance on transportation modes, ect. The majority was deciding societal rules and regulations WITHOUT government, but at least you were not locked up in a government prison.

          America used to have both a "business" free enterprise as well as a "cultural" free entrprise.

          Government has in the past also wrongly gone the other direction no doubt, but nowdays, government is the one who will come along and say, if you don't like homosexuals, then you are the bad person, not them. Government will tell you that you have to sell a homosexual couple a house in a neighborhood of traditional families. You have to let them eat in your restauraunt catering to traditional families. You have to let their bastard children attend school with your children.  All in the name of "Equality".

          America used to be like a gigantic voluntarry club, instead of the concentration camp you want under Obama, where he tells you how you are going to behave.

        • Mobley22

          So you support the guy who supports sodomittee mariage. You're no patriot.

    • PatriotDiva

      TROLL ALERT!!!!!! Go back to mommy's basement and read your comic books Mobley.

  • 2bvictorius

    If anyone should drop out, it is not Ron Paul. I believe he would beat Romney if Gingrich and Santorum should decide to drop out. But, my opinion is no one should drop out and if it goes all the way to the convention , or beyond so be it. As long as there is more than one target for Obama to concentrate on, it keeps the press talking about something other than their  illegal lord and master of deceit and disguise, the grand Imam Baraka Hussien Obama the second. Some of you may not be aware of this but Barack was first Baraka, at least that is his own story, but he has never explained when or why he chose to change his name, again and yet again. Actually, we don't really know who he is, or where he actually comes from. Isn't that something and doesn't that say a whole lot about how far down the slippery slope we have slid, and still sliding.  And I just saw another Poll , yes I know they are all rigged, but, this poll shows that 66% of women now support and plan on voting for their Arabian Knight in his shiny anglo American suit. Ahhh, the joys and virtues of the womens suffrage act are too numerous to count and a blessing for which all of mankind should thank those most noble of gentlemen, that bestoyed such a great gift upon us, for that we thank thee oh supreme court and may ye all have gone to your just reward,and reunion with ole scratch himself,  for that we pray and we thank thee.

    • Mobley22

      Wrong - you got your head to head dream in Virginia. The only 2 candidates on the ballot are Ron Paul and Mitt Romeny and Ron Paul is getting shellaced 3 to 1. So what are you saying? You just don't make any sense and your wishful thinking doesn't compart with reality or facts. Yea, legalize it!

      • TheChristianSolution

        Shellaced 3 to 1?  I am beginning to think you are on some of those illegal drugs.

        A vote of 3 to 1 would be 75% to 25%.  That did NOT happen.  The REAL results were 60% to 40%.

        Ron Paul won 4 out of every 10 votes.    Four out of every ten people wanted Ron Paul.

        And by the way, you know there isn't a single candidate who is winning every State, so one State cannot decide how all other States would vote in a one-on-one.

        Virginia is a three-way border State between Romney's New England stronghold, the South where Gingrich rules and Middle America where Santorum rules.

        If it had been a Mitt-to-Paul one-on-one in the South or Middle America, Ron Paul would have won.  And best yet, THOSE are the States who vote REPUBLICAN in the GENERAL ELECTION.

        Makes Ron Paul much more viable than Romney.  Massachusetts will vote Obama anyway, so Romney would not help the Republicans in November.

  • Frenchyfoof

    So glad I'm a Theocrat and not a Republucan, Democrat or Independent.... no worries here!! :-)

  • Blair

    Maybe. Hard to say.

  • http://www.survivingurbancrisis.com/ Silas Longshot

    Without the multimillion dollar attack campaign against the other 3, without the hype by the MSM, without the cash backing of big biz, big banks and every RINO in government endorsing him for expected favors, assuming he won, Romney would be nowhere. Take him as you will, Santorum is kickin' azz on a pocket change budget, against a political machine and 2 other hatchet jobs. Time will tell 

  • Luke179a

    Romney is not the most liberal of the four! Where do you get that info!?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rhonda-Reichel/1339255666 Rhonda Reichel

    Who cares?  If it is not Ron Paul there sure isn't much difference between Santorum - Obama - Romney

    Looks like I"m voting 3rd party again

    • Mobley22

      I realize that Ron Paul supporters like to take drugs, but you must have taken fistfulls today! Obama and Santorum the same. Let's see, Ron Paul the Liberaltarian and Romney and Obama the Liberals support the sodomites and the baby killers - but somehow when Ron Paul supports these things it is supposed to be constitutional - well voodoo boohoo! Ron Paul is not constitutional.

      • PatriotDiva

        Mobley you are an ignorant idiot. You know D@#n well Ron Paul is pro-life! He is a board certified obstetrician. People like take words out of context and twist them to discredit others. You are worse than a liar. I've never taken an illegal drug in my life but it seems you certainly have. Dr. Paul's stance is not to legalize illicit drugs, but to recognize the so-called "War on Drugs" has used up millions in taxpayers' money with nothing to show for it.

      • TheChristianSolution

        What is your purpose posting here. In this one post along you trounce every single candidate running.  What is your point then?

        You accuse Ron Paul, Obama and Santorum of taking drugs.
        You accuse Ron Paul, Obama and Romney of supporting sodomites and baby killers.

        I guess that leaves Gingrich, but you are talking of moral issues (mostly baseless), so you cannot support the Serial adulterer and the Serial violator of his oath of office either.

  • Mobley22

    It is comical that Ron Paul supporters try to talk of all the delegates he is somehow earning. He has yet to win a single county in any single state, let along a state. If Perry and Bachman and Cain were still in the race, they would most likely all be ahead of the irrelevant anarist Ron Paul too.

    • TheChristianSolution

      Mobley,  I's comical how often you are wrong.

      Ron Paul won Coos County in New Hampshire. (see election map)  Gingrich, Santorum and Perry votes all added together had less votes than Ron Paul.

      You say "anarchy", but every Ron Paul supporter says "freedom". Even most of the people who oppose him agree that Ron Paul wants freedom. They are just afraid that freedom will no longer work in our country.

      Irrelevant is what Gingrich is. Last night, he was dead last in more than half the States, he was second to last in all the other states.  His home State of Georgia being the sole exception where he won with less than a plurality, is contrasted with Romney who won his home State of Massachusetts by 72%.

      • ChillaKilla

        So let me see... your "ChristianSolution" is to elect a 'relativist' who wants to legalize drugs, allow homos to institute their idea of marriage as the norm,  allow homo education in schools... [if enough propaganda, activist judges and homo pressure manage to change the shepple's opinion], and gives Iran the green light to acquire nukes which most certainl will destroy Israel,  generate a nuke-race by the rest of the islamo-fascist countries, and ultimately threaten the rest of the civilized world?  WOW! With 'Christian Solutions'' like the one you offer, Jesus enemies, the Pharisees, seem mild by comparison.  

        • TheChristianSolution

          Yes, what do you misunderstand about freedom?  Caesar does not determine Christian moral behavior, Christians do.  George Washington and Thomas Jefferson understood this.  They didn't think Christians were going to hell if the federal government didn't have a law against homosexual marriage. (And by the way, the federal government in the entire history of this country has never had such a law.  Don't even try to tell me that homos did not exist 100 years ago because I read about them in my 3,000 year old Bible.)

          As for Iran getting nukes and "Oh my God the sky is going to fall in if we don't do something NOW", -- Been there and done that with Iraq and WMDs and I'm still paying for it.  Can't fool me again.  Besides, a Muslim country already has nukes, no one did a thing to stop them, no one did a thing to take the nukes away from them, so the cat is out of the bag.  Pakistan is more unstable than Iran and probably already building more nukes and will sell a few to every Muslim country in the world. You are too little -- too late.  Lastly, you don't want to address Israel having nukes in violation of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, so why should I care if Israel has nukes pointed at her?

      • Mobley22

        Ron Paul does not oppose chopping up children and supports the sodomittees. Good for RP, he won a county. Clap, clap, clap.

  • Stephen_Brady

    As I write this, Ohio has not been "called" on Super-Tuesday, and Romney is leading by 7000 votes.  Seven thousand voters in Ohio have voted for Rick Perry, not to mention about 150,000 for Gingrich.  It doesn't matter about Paul ... he won't win.  If Gingrich would drop out of the race ... and I don't see a path to the nomination, for him ... Santorum would defeat Romney.

    However, if the Convention is brokered, and that argues for everyone staying in the race, perhaps another candidate ... like Sarah Palin ... could win.  Not likely, but possible.

    Romney is not trusted by conservatives.  There is no enthusiasm for him.  If he won, in November ... which I don't think likely ... he would not have any coattails, and might even lose the House, not to mention failing to pick up the Senate.

    Four years of gridlock, with the MSM blaiming the GOP, and Obama could be back.  Remember, defeating Obama does not mean he won't be able to run again.  And if it's possible, someone worse could win in 2016, than Obama.

  • StocksOnTheRocks

    ROMNEY will make a GREAT PRESIDENT!
    Romney you can Trust! and Romney will turn the Economy "ON"
    Obama couldn't  lead a horse to water. 
    Newts a crook & Santorums a Bugger eater from the back (dark horse votes, cheer for the longshot, SouthEastern mentality)  and  Hopefully Ron Paul is Romney's V.P. Team Romney & Paul will get this Great Country Rockin & a Rolling again. it's obvious the media's brainwashed most of the comments here.

  • VirgoVince

    ANY dropping out should fall on Santorum and Paul!!    They just take important votes from Gingrich!!
    WE NEED, Gingrich!!

    • TheChristianSolution

      Where do you get your reasoning?  Gingrich was dead last in more than half the states last night and second to last in every other race, except his home state of Georgia, which he did not even get over 50%. Romney by the way took 72% of his home state.

      Ron Paul did much better than Gingrich.

      • VirgoVince

        You didn't read the last line!!   Worry MORE about OUR future and less about his past!!!!
        Romney and Santorum are lame-stream-media darlings and they're idiot libtards!!   THEY fear Gingrich, because he's the only MAN with balls that won't back down against our enemies, as they have done!!

        • soulandspirit

           Why can't you guys be even remotely realistic?!  Do you really believe they ( I'll assume you're referring to the DNC, Obama, and the MSM) ...are afraid of anyone in the field? 

          You're  seriously believing that they'd be so terrified of Gingrich over a single debate that will be forgotten in a day or his challenging the media?  All "they" have to do to knock him out is act in "Joe the Plumber" fashion and it's over!  Gingrich lacks the finances to fight back via media.  The DNC is well aware of it and armed w/Gingrich antics, foibles, etc. 

          Some of their campaign adverting will show Newt in agreement with the left's policies.  Be prepared to see Newt on the sofa w/Pelosi agreeing w/the lefts green position.  Newt will be given very little airtime to straighten that out. His funds will be inadequate to fight back.

          This isn't just a Pelosi/ couch scenerio.  Many more exist.  And you can count on them questioning Newts charachter. The broken oaths of his many marriages. His flipping religions every time he is caught. The point he hammered about Lewinski as he was having an affair AT THE SAME TIME is ammunition at the ready.

          Sure, we forgave him.  But it's fodder for the left nevertheless. Granted the left has amnesia when it comes to a moral failing on their side...but they have the memory of an elephant when it involves the right.  And the younger generation will accept the spin the left/MSM throw at them. Especially because Newt will have precious little time to straighten it out and he's lacking the funds to explain his side and expose inaccuracies.

          Be assured - "they" are NOT afraid of Newt. Or Santorum. Or Paul. Or Romney. Or you. Or me. "They own and run it all.  And if something actually exists in your life that they may not be aware of, they will publicly rip your life apart to find it. After humiliating their subject and coming up empty handed, "they" will make it up as they go along leaving you little to no recourse to defend yourself to set the record straight.

  • sean murry

    I am not voting for Romney he is another obummer.

  • justme

    BEING FROM PA. AND KNOWING SANTORUM  he will not win in pa. and i will vote third party

    • soulandspirit

       I hear ya, justme.  I KNOW SANTORUM too.  After all of his scandals, betrayals, back stabbing, lying, whining, thefts, hypocrisy, etc, etc, etc...I won't vote for him if my life depended on it.  I don't know anyone who can stand to even hear his name mentioned.  He can't pull his "good ol' christian boy" act here because we know his number.  Too bad the south doesn't know him or take the time to research him.  What makes me sick is he does all this stuff in the name of Christ.  That angers me more than anything else.

      That charlatan utters a few "hail Mary's" and "yeah Jesus" and they research no further. They CAN'T BE regardless of what they claim. If they did, they'd know what we know and understand why he lost by a record landslide close to 20%.  Remember, Santorum ALWAYS whines and is armed w/an excuse.  His excuse for his loss?..."2006 was a bad yer for republicans."    But he never mentions that those other losing repubs lost by 1 to 5% pts.  No one other than himself lost by 18-19%pts - a new record set in PA. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Stuart-Woodring/576215855 Stuart Woodring

    Here is the Real Issues.. Gingrich has so much baggage and caught screwing around all while trying to pin Clinton for his BS and lies..I guess it take one to know one ..Santorum is Way to far off on his Social agenda and doesn't have a clue as to fixing the Economy and to be honest he could not even win his seat back in Pa..so how in the world can he beat Obama? Ron Paul..certified nut case..wants to kiss up Iran and make it well..(that only works when you are three and your mother is doing it...LOL) Neither one of these 3 can win!
     That leaves Romney as the only real choice.. and if you do not slant his record, he actually is a conservative and the only one running that has actually run a successful business and everything he touches seems to work! I do not want a poor out of touch PRESIDENT that can't run anything!! We have that now! A community Organizer..and from what I see ...not a very good one.. So it boils down to the "ECONOMY" So stop the STUPIDITY and Lets get MITT elected so our Country can get Growing and become the Proud Nation Ronald Reagan left us with!!! 

  • Guest

    Ok, Ron Paul had his chance to win in Virginia.  It was just him and Romney; no one else on the ballot.  Ron Paul lost.  Just as he has lost every other race so far, and will lose every race going forward.  Ron Paul, it's time to concede.  Ron Paul supporters, it's time to pick another candidate to support.  I appreciate and respect many of his opinions, but he isn't going to win, so at this point, he is wasting money and damaging the other candidates. Ron Paul should pick another candidate to endorse and let's all pull together.

    • TheChristianSolution

      Ron Paul is keeping other candidates half way honest.  Of course, they'le revert back to their normal reptilian state as soon as the threat of Ron Paul is gone.

    • Darrell Smith

       You don't understand. Candidates other than Ron Paul are essentially the same as Obama: big government, military-industrial complex supporters, enemies of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. As a matter of honor, having sworn and oath to protect and defend the Constitution, this vietnam-era veteran has no choice but to vote ONLY Ron Paul, even if I have to write him in  The kids have it right. Wake up.

      • soulandspirit

         I appreciate your service to our country. I also served, joined the Army in 1985 and served until 1989.  Peacetime, save the stand-by we were placed on due to the Libya situation. 

        I DO understand. And I also continue in my defense of the constitution.  That is why I will not vote for Paul if he isn't the nominee.  Obama made it clear, to Medvedev/Putin - Russia!, that after he is re-elected he would become unleashed. He plans on giving them sensitive information that could mean the destruction of the US. 

        Knowing his intentions, how can we do anything other than support his opposition?!  If his opposition is a lighter version of him, that could at least buy us time to regroup, restructure our opposition, groom a patriot for 2016.  Teach our youth the truth through new avenues and ventures.

        I'm not just going to hand my freedom over to a tyrant because I'm dissatisfied with our nominee.  I'm not going to look my father, mother, children, friends  in the eye and tell them I just helped sacrificed their freedom for a false act of nobility.  And that is what a 3rd party or write-in vote is.  The GOP isn't punished as many of you believe.  It is your family, your loved ones, yourself, who are punished.  The GOP, DNC, whatever group see it this way - "so we lost an election, but our safety, security, lavishness, luxury will continue as before.   They lose nothing but the election!

        We are the true losers. We pay the price. Our safety and security will be gone.  Our freedoms diminish along with our lifestyles.  Our food supply smaller. Access to transportation fades as we watch every penny. Our way of life has changed for the worst.  The GOP isn't punished or taught a lesson. It's your mom and dad, your brothers and sisters, your children - they're punished. And what lesson were they taught?  That our side failed in strategy and didn't understand how to by time to gear up for the real battle for our nation? Our freedom. Our safety and security. Our provisions.

        Look, I hate, I mean DESPISE, Rick Santorum. I voted for him for senate the first time because of his great speeches and campaign promises. We were won over by his expressed faith in Christ, his family values.  He turned out to be the very opposite of who he claimed to be. We united to unseat him. And beings that we worked so hard to unseat him from a mere senate seat, do you think it easy for us to now have to work to seat him in the highest office in the land?  That is adding insult to injury.

        But for the good of my country, I'd make that sacrifice and do what I had to do to seat him again.  Not because he'd be a good POTUS.  He'd be awful!  But slightly less awful than Obama, restrained due to re-election concerns, and he'd provide us patriots with "time" to get it right.  "Time" to reorganize, regroup, rearm, reset.  Romney, Paul, Santorum, Gingrich would serve to provide cover and bide us time.  If we unite and work hard, that might be enough to turn the tide.

  • http://twitter.com/alfwats09 Paula Watson

    Not a chance... they can all drop out, Romney will be nominee!

  • BOOMER8

    Well, could Romney win if everybody else dropped out?  Could Ron Paul win if all the GOP establishment hacks stop attacking him as if he wasn't a real conservative?  
    Face it, folks, we don't want Santorum, or Romney, or Newt!!  And the ONLY reason people aren't "sure" of Paul is because of the GOP Party hacks who keep attacking him from their Left side viewpoint!

    • ChillaKilla

      Hey Bommer8 remind us, how many primaries has Paul won to date??? Oh, that's right: NONE, ZILCH, ZERO.... So why is it that paulBOTS keep on insisting their fuzzyheaded ol'gizzer god could ultimately win the general election? Must be because you are all as fuzzy-headed as he is.

  • Jill

    I love Rick Santorum. He speaks from his heart and loves God and his family. His God is Jesus Christ. Romney's is the devil. Please dont elect another president who serves the devil.

    • soulandspirit

       His God is power and money.  You can judge a person by who they keep company with.  Santorum never backed Christians and pro-life candidates.  He backed and campaigned for liberal, atheistic, pro-abortion people over pro-life, solid Christian people.  Look no further than 2006, what he voted for, who he backed and campaigned for, etc.

      Ignore his words as he is a crafty wordsmith.  Pay attention to his works and preferred alliances.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/U4JKGP6V3Q3FN6RI66SG6GYMFU Sue

    If Romney hadn't run such a Mud Slinging Carpetbagger Campaign -$20 ML - $17 Ml in FLordia Alone-- Newt Gingerich would not only have past Santorumn he would be in the LEAD - He is the Only one with True Conservative Values - That is why Michael Reagan Ronald Older Conservative Son-Endorsed him- As Well As Chuck Norris - Art Laffler (Reagans Economic Advisor) Herman Cain & Many Others Todd Palin-Sarah Palin She knows who the True Conservative is - And it isn't EarMarker Pork King Santorum The Finger Pointer that Called Newt a Lobbyist When he does exazctly the Same type of Advising & Consulting And no one YET has Called him on it - He Sits On the Board of United Health Care- & he Does not have the Experience or PLAN to get the Nation Going - Newt has put a Detailed Plan Contract FOR America - Repealing HC Bill Firing Liberal ALL the CZars - &  Cutting Many of the Departments - & Reducing the Size of GOVT that Barry has Blown UP & with another 4 years We will see more Sweeping Regulations the Implementing of Obamanation & the Most Depressed Economy with Another 48 Months of 8-10% UN Employ While he & the Progressives Laugh as  Wine & Dine with The Hollywood Nut Jobs Who believe they know Best

  • Lillaflynn

    Santorum is too sanctimonious for my taste and his constant complaining about how much money is being spent against him is anything but conservative in my view.  Raise more money yourself!  He had a cow when Gingrich wanted he and Paul to drop out so he could have a two man race against Romney - why should Gingrich bow out for him now?  Personally, for all his past personal issues with family, I prefer Newt for his toughness and his ability to take it to Obama as no one else will.  But, too many people who vote in the Republican race can't see past his personal issues (and they are personal) and are too quick to try to make more of his taking money for work his company did with Fannie and Freddie, than they ought to do - there are no perfect people. No one will ever have a perfect record on everything.  I love Glenn Beck, but he is a Morman so I am not persuaded by his yacking on about Gingrich's "character".  The man has apologized - what happened to forgiveness?  And, I surely didn't appreciate Nacy Pelosi sticking her nose into our decision (Republicans, conservatives and independents) about who should be the Republican candidate.  Of course, the Democrats have been busy throughout the process, kicking first Sarah Palin, then (the nice guy from the midwest), then they went after Herman Cain and followed up with attacks against Bachman and Gingrich.  They have been all over Romney and to a lesser extent, Santorum of late.  Santorum had better stop whining and calling himself the underdog before they really do shine a bright light on him.  And by "they" I do not mean Romney, Gingrich or Paul.

    • soulandspirit

       Yup...Santorum plays victim and WHINES about everything.  He's whining about what Romney is spending on his campaign.  Do this...just ask Santorum how much HE SPENT on his 2006 senate election.  Believe me, it was a boatload of cash spent on nothing but the most vicious attack ads you'd ever seen.  And he still lost!  :)

       I'm sure he'll interpret your genuine question as a personal and unfair gotcha question and he'll whine some more.

  • Intolerantrwj

    Could Gingrich beat Romney if Santorum + Ron Paul dropped out .... uummm, YEP  ....... or do you just want some doofus for the next 4 ?

  • Xeriscapelady

    Why is it that NEWT is not looked at in this? He is the most intelligent by far and has the plans that are the best. he could show you at the brokered convention that he is the ONLY one who could beat Obama. Rick is great for a v.p. for NEWT, but as a v.p. for Romney, as he would become more liberal as time goes by. Even this author says NEWT is the most conservative of the the 3, not including wacko Paul) war and drugs). Paul could never get elected, but Newt could. But if we get Romney, it would be a slow death for this country, IF he could beat Obama which that would be a real toss up for sure. All Obama has to say is ROMNEY CARE and the race is over. I don't see Romney winning anything. he has to BUY his votes and with Obama having a BILLION, Romney could not raise enough. he can't buy REAL conservative people.Real conservatives of course would NEVER vote for Obama, but they would vote for THEIR favorite candidate...and the ESTABLISHMENT Republican party would be over after  this election. Then the TRUE Reagan conservatives could take over...and that includes NEWT. As Nancy Reagan said, "Ronnie passed the torch to NEWT". What else could that mean but NEWT is a true Reagan conservative. Also Michael Reagan the true conservative son( even though he was adopted)....is for him and has campaigned with him. Sarah Palin is with NEWT also, as are many other Conservative Republicans.
    NEWT is the ONLY one that should be president.

  • SamualAdams

    Could Conservative  Newt beat (Ultra liberal gay marriage Mitt abortion RomneyCare anti2amend) if Santorum a moderate dropped out.

  • soulandspirit

    Nobody in their right mind would vote for thin-skinned, Obama-lite Santorum.  He had/has more in common w/Obama than any of the candidates. Yeah, go ahead, bust on Romney who voted against an abortion privilege in Mass that won in court and added it to the bill, tying his hands - yet he got blamed for it. (without crying)

    Santorum promised to stop funding Planned Parenthood and KNEW there was that provision attached to a bill, that his constituents pleaded with him not to support, even when part of that bill would of benefited them, yet Santorum passes it anyway - no court order demanding so as in Romney's case. It's obvious which is worse.

    Rick and Obama share a housing scandal, same exact kind. But Obama was helped by Rezko who kindly is serving time for him. Rick managed to slither away from anything more than a penalty, ethics violations, and a hefty fine.

    Obama & Santorum are quite generous to charity. Obama parting with 1% under usual circumstances and 2% in an election year.  Santorum is far more generous giving 2% on a regular basis and 4%  during an election.                   (Compare that to Romney's 15 -22%  and  Gingriches 18%)

    But then again  Santorum did begin a charity. Too bad he forget to file the legal paperwork for it (I guess that is his habit after seeing him miss so many filing deadlines in several states for a man who claims he wants to be POTUS.  And beings he's spent his who life in Washington you'd think he'd know how to file by now)  

    More ethics violations came as it was discovered Santorum's charity was benefiting Santorum, deeply lining his pockets, and little of the funds going to where it was suppose to go.  (Guess that's how Mr. poor Blue Collar guy secured his multimillion dollar homes at 1/2mil and another multimillion dollar home in VA)

    Mr. "I'm for the working people" backed the unions from day one. He denied you, the honest worker, a pay raise which hasn't been seen in PA for over a decade.  We were due.  But when the house voted for their own raises - guess who was first in line to vote HIMSELF one generous pay raise?!  Yup - along with an annual cost of living increase and bigger bloated benefits, no wonder he didn't want to leave!  Then he voted, to cover his butt, on tons of pork to supposedly benefit PA.    That was his excuse.  And we learned Santorum is ALWAYS armed with excuses or accusatory remarks against another, since nothing is ever his fault - ANOTHER TRAIT SHARED BY SANTORUM & OBAMA.  He will defend all of his obscene votes that his constituents objected to.  Even his support for the bridge to nowhere. Sometimes he defends it w/excuses, other times he blatantly denies it, even though he knows the record could be checked to verify. He lies when he knows you know he's lying and couldn't care less.  (Obama does the same)

    Santorum had his chance to heal the wounds he created with conservatives during our primary when he could of backed Pat Toomey, a proven, solid, Christian Conservative who has honorably served our nation. Toomey honors his word, having served 3 terms in the house of reps but refused a fourth due to a campaign promise.  He is President of the "Club for Growth".  A solid guy. So we talked him into running for state sen, and after much thought and constituent pressure, he agreed. He'd be running against uber liberal, democrat supporting, conservative traitor Arlen Specter. To every conservative and moderates surprise, guess who Santorum endorsed and campaigned for?!  SPECTER!  He kicked a devout Christian, Pat Toomey to the curb making yet another weak excuse as to why he did - he said because he needed a vote on a bill he knew Specter would pass.  Liar!  Toomey has never voted w/dems and would of gladly supported Santorums bill.  Weak, weak excuse. 

    So "Mr. Uncompromising pro-life" endorsed and campaigned for an avid pro-choice candidate, when he had a clear choice of backing a genuine pro-life candidate - but wouldn't support him.  Specter, the one Santorum liked so much, endorsed in spite of his 2 decade record of liberal activism, campaigned for knowing how staunchly against him we were, went on to bear witness to his candidate vote with enthusiasm in support of Obamacare.  Something Toomey would of NEVER DONE.

    Ultimately, in spite of Santorum's interference, Specter knew it was over, left our party and joined the democrats and ran on a dem ticket.  So Santorum, who had full knowledge of his liberal record and close alliances with dems, backed him in spite of all those things.  And to everyone's joy, Specter didn't win in the dem primary as he thought he would.  Specter, after decades and decades of occupying a seat he believed he was king of the world in was finally dethroned...for good.  For good measure, we got rid of the charlatan, opportunist, thin-skinned, back stabbing, immature, corrupt thief - Santorum. 

    Pat Toomey is now serving our state with dignity, honor, and fulfilling every campaign promise he made. 

    We Pennsylvanians know Santorum well.  If anyone in the primary race is Obama lite, it's Santorum and Santorum knows it. He is accusing others of being what he is.  He is attempting to deflect by projecting his baggage on others. And he is such an accomplished liar, he does it with a straight face, feigned outrage,  conviction and strong emotion believing that enhances his innocence.  And people fall for it.

    Consider his congressional race. Recall how he tore his opponent apart by exposing him for carpetbagging, and he did this with nasty campaign ads, brutal speeches - he was harsh and hit below the belt many times.  What was criminal in all this is later the press exposed Santorum for carpetbagging. Of course he denied it, but when it got to a point he couldn't, he made excuses for it or used technicalities to justify it.  The whole point being Santorum went after a guy, exposing him, degrading him, ruining him - for doing the same thing Santorum was doing!  And Santorum did worse!  Because the other guy who campaigned in PA but lived in Maryland never tried to steal from our school districts.  Santorum who campaigned in PA, lived in a mansion in PA, was also living with his family in their other mansion in Virginia.  But Santorum enrolled his kids in our schools, cyber school that his children were doing while living in their Virginia home - out of PA district, costing our already strapped district over $100k, and then refused to pay it back, having had to go to court (on our dime) just for him to be told by the judge he had to pay it back.  The other carpetbagger never pulled such a stunt.  So Santorum accuses a man for doing exactly what he was doing and even  worse!  -  Does that not sound like Obama?!

    Santorum had no problem abusing our taxes.  He was also exposed for dialing 911 to send cops to check on his empty property in PA. (since he was still living in Virgina)  He did this so many times, it finally was leaked and exposed.  Of course he had an excuse, that NO ONE fell for, for those little stunts too.

    And Santorum making fun of Romney's money and what he spends in campaigns is another hypocrisy.  Santorum is well to do. But unlike Romney, he stole most of what he got. And as far as campaign cash, if he had it, he'd be using it the same way as Romney. And that's a FACT because he did just that in PA.  Most senate races cost a few million, like one to three million.  Santorum was given a blank check from the unions and spent upwards of $8m in attack ads. So he is full of crap. If I were Romney, I'd bring that up at every turn.

    And lobbyists?  How can Santorum go after Gingrich or even Obama on lobbyists when  he was the king of lobbyists?  I'm sure he'll have another excuse for that too.  (otherwise known as a lie)

    Santorum is of the mindset, if I can't win, I will ensure everyone goes down with me.  Why else would he purposely try to bankrupt Romney so he'd have no money left to fight in a general election?  That's evil.

  • Joe Reding

    You see? This is all out of whack because instead of using real numbers you went for the sake of argument of 70% would go to Romney. That shows you are already biased. Would you care to redo the numbers and say 70% would go to Rick Santorum?
    Rick and Newt are splitting conservative votes between themselves. The only benefit Romney would have is if they both were to leave the race. If only one leaves; then it is over for Romney.
    Just using your sake of argument in the other, more realistic direction.

  • 128517

    yes but even better is that Santorum s people vote for Paul so that a REAL voice could be heard and a REAL stop to the socialist government can be made.  Ron Paul is the Antidote to Obama, the complete opposite and healing agent of the economy and foreign policy.  The delegates count is different from the public count.  and Ron Paul is getting delegates that are not being reported now but will at the convention.. or after the causes decide in each state.
    One thing I feel is that I can trust Ron Paul but Romney, he seems sweet but what is he really going to be like after elected.  How can we trust a marshmello.