The Revival of the Hollywood Blacklist

black list

During the 1940s and 1950s, Hollywood producers, directors, and actors were scrutinized for their political beliefs. The period of “red hysteria” put people’s jobs in the film industry in jeopardy. “Artists were barred from work on the basis of their alleged membership in or sympathy toward the American Communist Party, involvement in liberal or humanitarian political causes that enforcers of the blacklist associated with communism, and/or refusal to assist federal investigations into Communist Party activities; some were blacklisted merely because their names came up at the wrong place and time.”

Writers and directors testified before Congress and the specially called House Committee on Un-American Activities. When a group of 10 writers and directors — the so-called Hollywood Ten — refused to testify before the committee, a Hollywood “blacklist” was instituted on November 25, 1947. On June 22, 1950, the journal Counterattack published Red Channels, a report on the “Communist Influence in Radio and Television.” The booklet identified 151 actors, writers, musicians, broadcast journalists, and others it believed were using the entertainment industry to spread Communist ideals. Even before publication, some on the list were already being denied employment because of their political beliefs. Beginning in May of 1947, the Counterattack newsletter published weekly information on the political views of entertainment figures.

On November 25, 1947 (the day after the House of Representatives approved citations of contempt for the Hollywood Ten because of their refusal to testify), Eric Johnston, President of the Motion Picture Association of America, issued a two-page press release that represented the views of the heads of the major studios. The “Waldorf Statement,” as it came to be called, announced the firing of the Hollywood Ten and stated:

“We will forthwith discharge or suspend without compensation those in our employ, and we will not re-employ any of the 10 until such time as he is acquitted or has purged himself of contempt and declares under oath that he is not a Communist. . . . We will not knowingly employ a Communist or a member of any party or group which advocates the overthrow of the government of the United States.”

Most people today would not recognize the names of the Hollywood Ten. The Oscar-winning Dalton Trumbo (1905 –1976) might be the exception. He started as one of the highest paid writers in Hollywood making $4000 per week and worked on a number of noted films: Kitty Foyle (1940), Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo (1944), A Guy Named Joe (1943), Spartacus (1960), and Our Vines Have Tender Grapes (1945), starring Edward G. Robinson whose name was published in the Red Channels booklet, although Robinson was never “officially” blacklisted.

Trumbo’s 1939 anti-war novel, Johnny Got His Gun, won an American Book Sellers Award that year[1] and was produced as a film during the Vietnam era.[2] It didn’t help Trumbo that the novel was serialized in the Communist periodical The Daily Worker in March 1940 and “became ‘a rally point for the left’ which had opposed involvement in World War II during the period of the Hitler-Stalin pact.” This and a visit from the FBI[3] made Trumbo persona non grata among many in Hollywood, especially since, politics aside, bad publicity could doom a film that was written by an anti-war advocate. How do you sell a movie to a patriotic public when the screenplay was written by a “Commie”? Hollywood is about money and ideology. Left-leaning actors, writers, directors, and producers knew this, that’s why the movies they worked on did not espouse much of their radical ideology. They made their money from the system of government and economics that they hoped to reshape using a failed political system.

Little has changed in our day. Leftists extol the virtues of Che Guevara (Che to his friends), Fidel Castro, described as “Hollywood’s favorite tyrant,”[4] and Hugo Chavez while failing to comprehend that their profession would be controlled by these dictators and used for propaganda purposes.

Trumbo was still able to make a living while blacklisted since producers got his services at bargain-basement prices if his work went uncredited or was acknowledged under an assumed name. In fact, he had more work than he could handle.[5]

“The film blacklist ended in 1960 when Kirk Douglas, the star and executive producer of Stanley Kubrick’s Spartacus, credited blacklisted writer Dalton Trumbo, of the Hollywood Ten, as the movie’s writer, using Trumbo’s real name. Ever since his blacklisting in 1947, Trumbo had been submitting scripts under the pseudonym Sam Jackson.  President-elect John Kennedy crossed American Legion picket lines to view Spartacus, thereby lending the credibility of the nation’s highest office to the effort to end blacklisting. . . .  Also in 1960, director Otto Preminger publicly announced that Trumbo had written his blockbuster film, Exodus.”[6]

The Hollywood blacklist era has outraged liberals for more than 60 years, but this hasn’t stopped modern-day liberals from creating their own version of a blacklist made up of conservatives. This is especially true of up and coming actors who are trying to make it in Hollywood. The conservative views of established actors are generally ignored because they are box-office draws. Ideology aside, their movies make money! This was especially true for someone like Charlton Heston who continued to work even though he was perceived to be far to the right politically. Of course, Heston was hardly the stereotypical conservative. “Though often portrayed as an ultra-conservative, Heston wrote in his 1995 autobiography ‘In the Arena’ that he was opposed to the McCarthy witch hunts of the 1950s, was against the Vietnam War and thought President Richard Nixon was bad for America.” He also participated in the March on Washington in 1963, along with liberal icons Burt Lancaster, James Baldwin, Marlon Brando, Sidney Poitier, and Harry Belafonte (see images here and here).

Hollywood continues to have its fingers in the political pie. They are not neutral observers but active participants in shaping the political landscape with their money and star-power influence. The 2008 Franken-Coleman election in Minnesota is testimony to the power of the Hollywood purse. A lot of liberal money came in to support Franken by noted liberals like Tom Hanks, Robin Williams, George Clooney, Michael J. Fox, Ted Danson, David Letterman, Mike Myers, Dan Aykroyd, and Steve Martin. Because the FCC data base is open to the media, those who donate are available to the Hollywood left. A conservative who donated to Coleman would be “outed” in periodicals like Variety and Politico and might find it difficult getting steady work in the entertainment industry (see interview here).

A similar tactic is being used to punish those who supported California’s pro-hetersexual marriage Proposition 8. A Los Angeles Times article reported that many “in liberal Hollywood who fought to defeat the initiative banning same-sex marriage and are now reeling with recrimination and dismay. Meanwhile, activists continue to comb donor lists and employ the Internet to expose those who donated money to support the ban. Already out is Scott Eckern, director of the nonprofit California Musical Theatre in Sacramento, who resigned after a flurry of complaints from prominent theater artists, including ‘Hairspray’ composer Marc Shaiman, when word of his contribution to the Yes on [Prop] 8 campaign surfaced.” Recently Peter Vidmar, a double gold-medal winner in the 1984 Olympics in gymnastics, was forced to resign as Chairman of USA Gymnastics. Why? Because in 2008 he donated $2000 to support Proposition 8. The homosexual defamation machine went into action and put pressure on the Olympic Committee and its sponsors. The blacklist lives!

A letter writer to the San Francisco Chronicle who supported Prop 8 was intimidated when Internet search engines were used “to find the letter writer’s small business, his Web site (which included the names of his children and dog), his phone number and his clients. And they posted that information in the ‘Comments’ section of SFGate.com—urging, in ugly language, retribution against the author’s business and its identified clients.”

Now, is this to say that conservatives can’t work in Hollywood today? Not at all. Is there a fear factor that keeps conservatives from speaking out? I don’t doubt it. Those who are touted as conservatives usually have no stated public opinion on abortion and homosexuality. Patricia Heaton and Angie Harmon are notable exceptions. Kurt Russell is listed as a conservative, actually, a libertarian, which might explain why he’s living with Goldie Hawn and not married to her, although I must say that he’s stayed with her longer than Brad Pitt did with Jennifer Aniston. Many (most?) are economic conservatives like Kelsey Grammar and Drew Carey but social liberals. And there are more who are being encouraged to make their conservative beliefs public. Here’s a list you might want to check out.

The recent publication of Ben Shapiro’s book Primetime Propaganda: The True Hollywood Story Of How The Left Took Over Your TV is a primary source of self-admission by the movers and shakers in the entertainment industry that they are liberal and proud of it. Playwright, essayist, screenwriter, film director, and Nobel Prize winner David Mamet has broken free of the liberal plantation. His article “My I Am No Longer a ‘Brain-Dead Liberal’” is worth reading as is his just released book The Secret Knowledge.

Like so much of liberalism, liberals are hypocritical. They decry the blacklisting of the 1940s and 1950s but don’t seem to mind if the right people, in their estimation, are being blacklisted today who defy their pet social and political causes. The Seinfeld episode where two homosexuals confront Kramer because he won’t wear the red AIDS ribbon is illustrative of liberal “dialogue.” He is opposed to “ribbon bullies.” (See the clip here.) “The storyline appeared to be based on the real-life controversy of former Days of Our Lives actress Deidre Hall, who, in 1993 publicly refused to wear AIDS ribbons at public events, such as the Daytime Emmys. Hall claimed that the volunteers who passed out the ribbons bullied celebrities into wearing the ribbons.’

So what’s the solution? Beat them at their own game. Write and produce better films that make money, make people laugh, cry, think, and imagine! In Gary Susman’s article “Hollywood Conservatives: Come out of the closet and be heard!,” the point is made that what people want is good entertainment, and they generally don’t care who produces it:

[I]n entertainment, people want escapism, not spinach or propaganda. It’s why (as conservatives note) few went to see last year’s group of movies critical of the War on Terror (In the Valley of Elah, Rendition, Lions for Lambs, etc.) or this year’s W., but it’s also why few went to see American Carol, either. (It’s not a liberal conspiracy that both Carol and W. are being roundly ignored in favor of talking chihuahuas.) Explicitly partisan movies, left or right, don’t seem to do as well as those that give both sides a voice or whose ideology takes a backseat to plot and character development.

Amen! Go and do likewise.

email
Print Friendly
Notes:
  1. In 1971, the novel was turned into a film of the same name and a low-budget Live On-Stage production in 2008. []
  2. The title comes from the line “Johnny get your gun” from the George M. Cohan song “Over There” (1917) that was used for recruitment for WW I and II. For the lyrics, go here. Watch the scene from Yankee Doodle Dandy (1942) starring James Cagney who is shown singing the song along with soldiers marching in front of the White House. []
  3. Trumbo tells the circumstances surrounding the FBI visit in the Introduction to the 1959 edition of Johnny Got Your Gun (see here). []
  4. Humberto Fontova, Fidel: Hollywood’s Favorite Tyrant (Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing, 2005). “The book criticizes American celebrities, particularly Hollywood actors, who support Fidel Castro’s government in Cuba and often travel to meet with Castro personally. Among those singled out are Jack Nicholson, Danny Glover, Harry Belafonte, Chevy Chase, Steven Spielberg, Ted Turner, and Dan Rather.” []
  5. Ronald Radosh and Allis Radosh, Red Star Over Hollywood: The Film Colony’s Long Romance with the Left (New York: Encounter Books, 2006), 208. []
  6. Richard A. Schwartz, “How the Film and Television Blacklists Worked.” []

  • Paul

    I must admit that I too have my own black list of ultra liberals in the entertainment industry whose films I wouldn't cross the street to view for free – who have in the past stated flatly stated that they would leave the country if so and so were elected. Of course they didn't nor would they ever. Why? Because they know on which side their bread is buttered and how it got there, i.e. the public at large who are interested only in being entertained and couldn't care less what the actors, directors, producers and writers' ideology is. That said I must admit though that those in the industry who travel outside the country and meet with and grabass with American hating dictators who openly threaten America – well, those I do boycott their films and only view them by accident being unaware of who they are or that they had any part in making the film until the credits run.

    American communists/marxists/socialists, i.e. anyone opposed to capitalism, liberty and our founding documents, are without exception phonies, liars and hypocrites to the extreme. If they actually believe that living under such ideologies would be so wonderful why haven't they long ago moved to and lived in countries that are governed by ruthless dictators who put in practice those ideologies. Answer: Because they know deep down inside that its all a bunch of crap and they want to continue living the good life in America where freedom and capitalism ensures their bank accounts are well padded.

    • Gary

      Exactly! You took the words out of my mouth.

      I go out of my way to patronize those who speak out against the left, and I wouldn't pay a nickel to see anything made by the Hanks/Penn/Streisand/O'Donnell/Glover cabal of communists. I think the pendulum is starting to swing back though. Obama and his crew have shown just how destructive a communist/socialist can be for this country.

      Vote with your wallet – and remember November!

  • http://www.xanga.com/STEVENPILL Steven Mark Pilling

    The insularity of Hollywood society plays a large part in this. When you're a celebrity or move in the company of celebrities, Biz executives and functionaries almost exclusively, when you're making a good living and basking in the limelight- directly or by reflection- and when that living is reliant on the good will of those others, you fall into the mentality of those around you. To do otherwise is to place all that and your prospects for a comfortable future at risk. And, as Hollywood has- since the advent of Jack Valenti in 1963- become unrestrained by any professional or ethical values in its conduct, on or off the screen, that insularity has breed a fantastic Neverneverland where every value considered sane or moral beyond its precincts are viewed either with suspicion or absolute hostility. An alternate universe, in truth.

    To see it at its full measure of despicability is to understand its prediliction not only of sex and violence in its grossest possible elements, but to appreciate how far, since the mid-1970's, it has come to apply those factors towards children…now to include not only adolescents, but actual preteens. My sights turned toward Hollywood's threat when, in 2006, an actual work of unadulterated child pornography was forwarded. And it did so without legal penalty, despite numerous state and federal laws. That was a turning point for a number of "closet conservatives" in Hollywood, too- as I learned with the expansion of my base of associates. That, plus the slow, but steady rise of the Christian/Family oriented "alternate Hollywood" has brought them together. But most remain secretive- for the reasons I've stated.

    Until they come together in open defiance of the powers-that-be and can make it stick, the American entertainment field will continue its long slide into degeneracy. And they'll drag children, both in and out of the Industry, right along with them. Hollywood is too dangerous to be allowed its free ride any longer.

  • Randy131

    Unfortunately the pendulum has swung, and today if you are of a conservative persuasion in Hollywood, you are on an unwritten blacklist and cannot find any semblance of stable employment, if any. Today there are even openly public communist and/or socialist caucusses in the US Congress, as well as many Unions and their members publicly proclaiming to be either loyal socialists or communists. And people wonder why our economy is failing so badly, after many years of these communists and socialists participating in our government and openly implementing their policies and agendas on our government and economy. DUH, are we going bankrupt as a nation because Alinsky's proverbial policies are working? The ones who instituted them, Obama and the Democrats, think so.

  • Jill

    That's ok. I have my own blacklist. I don't spend my hard earned money on the crap these Hollywood Libs put out!

  • Dewey E. Du Bose

    Our First Amendment gives those living and working in Hollywood the right to speak out against our form of government. They are even allowed to be stupidly wrong about who’s side they are one when it come to The USA or some dictator run country. I show my disrespects by not attending any showing of their works. I will not watch them on TV, Video nor will I listen to them on the radio.

    They have the right to be wrong. They have the right to be stupid. I have the choice to not give them my hard earned dollars.

    While I will never forgive her, I believe that Hanoi jane has seen the error of her younger days. The now generation will someday realize just how much America means to them.

    They show us no respect, why should we show them any? Deport each and everyone of them to any counttry that will have them as citizens.

    Dewey E. Du Bose
    Sergeant Major
    U.S. Army, Retired

  • LAURENCE CRIPE

    I also have a black list of liberals in Hollywood. I don't support them and I make every effort to buy tickets for family members to view conservative motion pictures – having spent more than $ 400 on "Atlas Shrugged". I also write screenplays like "Die Hard-on – Another Day in Paradise", "Pages to a Dead Man", "Neptune Rising", and "The Devil's Rotisserie" – all of which embody true conservative values and take the time to show the dead-beat, collectivist ideas for what they are – tributes to failed social structures and suffering throughout the history of man. Every actor, producer, and director mentioned in this article are social deadbeats whose only claim to stardom comes from a hollow structure that bears very little resemblance to the fabulous and gracious Hollywood of the 30's, 40's, 50's, and 60's – before the studio system totally collapsed. This system needs to be resurrected through independent film societies that borrow little from Hollywood and are conducted by non-union film-makers. The creativity will always be here, but it doesn't have to be connected with the has-beens. I still can't understand why these derelicts pay attention to horrifically flawed social calamities like Castro's Cuba or that pussy, Che "The Dead" Guevara… It speaks oceans for their dead minds.

  • A pen

    The "blacklist" as it was coined was used to label people for their beliefs. If we as a society can not share a label of ones beliefs then who are the sex criminals on lists? Who are the members of the communist party officially and legally proscribed ? What will the uninformed know of the enemy of our republic when they are educated to adore it? Worry less about the list and more about the ideology that produced it. Lists and labels are tools to aid in applying the first amendment right to issue coercive and critical language toward those we disagree with. It is the open debate which reveals who is just and who is a tyrant. The real problem is that the people have been misled by the forces of communism inside government as if the use of force to overthrow the republic was any less evil when it comes as a lie or a gun. Both are a force, a means to an end. Both have the same political result. McCarthy was right.

  • Bill1

    Hollywood – the "fruit" basket of America.

    • Dewey E. Du Bose

      The" Rotten Fruit " basket of world. I say this because every country that still has the freedom to produce its own film, plays, etc are just as bad as our own home grown socialist elite.

      And the sad part of this is there are a large number of good guys and gals in the business who are in touch with reality and are good citizens, but are afraid to speak out for fear of being Blacked Balled by the liberals who run the "show".

  • Mamaduck

    SELF ENHANCED EGOS WITH AN AGENDA! Living in a land of makebelieve and telling lies for a living. Unfortunatley some of them have fallen for their own lies. The phrase they fear the most from the rest of us mortals is "WE SEE YOU". We won't forget. Even Tokyo Rose was sentenced to a long prison term when all was said and done. She was a very famous radio personality until the truth was told. They shouldn't expect any less.

  • GladysMP

    Our local paper prints reviews of new movies and I read them and find myself wondering, "Why would anyone pay money and spend time to attend such?" "The world is so full of such wonderful things, I'm sure we should all be as happy as kings." There are so many more-interesting ways to spend one's time than at the type of movies made today.

  • barry

    The love the millions they make through capitalism, but hate America and what this nation stands for. They are pathetic human beings who think they are superior to the common American simply because of their ability to be someone else in front of a camera. These people make me want to vomit!

  • Jake

    So Burt Lancaster refused to work with conservative actors? That itself should be a long article with all the details.