The Hidden History of Social Security

Social-Security PosterSocial Security is in the news. People are finally telling the truth: It’s a government sponsored Ponzi (Pyramid) scheme. In the beginning, the costs of Social Security were not that great and not everybody was in the system. In fact, Congress had exempted itself. Most federal and state workers were not in the system. Public school teachers were exempt. They could opt for a private system. Members of Congress had their own private government (taxpayer)-funded system. This didn’t change until 1984. Compared to today, the costs of Social Security were small. Those in the system paid two percent (employee and employer pay-in combined) on $3000 per year for a total of $60. Now it’s nearly 12.5 percent on more than $106,000 per year.

According to the Social Security board of trustees, there were 42 “covered workers” per Social Security beneficiary in 1945. For every person receiving benefits, 42 people paid for that single recipient. Seemed like magic, except that few people anticipated the “birth dearth,” a decline in family size, legalized abortion, increased SS benefits, a larger recipient pool, and that taking money from people to pay other people is immoral. But we’re talking about “government funding.” Immoral is its middle name.

Since 1945, the number paying into the system has changed dramatically:

There were only 1.75 full-time private-sector workers in the United States last year [2010] for each person receiving benefits from Social Security, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Social Security board of trustees. That means that for each husband and wife who worked full-time in the private sector last year there was a Social Security recipient somewhere in the country taking benefits from the federal government.

Most Americans don’t know much about the financial structure of Social Security, and they also don’t know much about its history. Here’s just a little background. Take it for what it’s worth.

In William L. Shirer’s book The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich we learn the origin of Social Security policies and the effect they had on the German people. Social Security was engineered by German Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck in the 19th century. His policies gradually made the German people “value security over political freedom and caused them to see in the State, however conservative, a benefactor and a protector.”[1] Between 1883 and 1889 Bismarck put through a program for social security far beyond anything known in other countries at the time. It included compulsory insurance for workers against old age, sickness, accident and incapacity, and though it was organized by the State it was financed by employers and employees. Sound familiar? This is American-style Social Security!

Adolf Hitler took full advantage of the German state of mind and Bismarck’s early progress in turning the nation into a model of socialist reform. Hitler remarks in Mein Kampf, “I studied Bismarck’s socialist legislation in its intention, struggle and success.”[2] It was Hitler’s social security policies and promises that helped get him elected.

Hitler was not alone in his admiration of Bismarck and what he was able to accomplish. FDR borrowed Bismarck’s socialist agenda and created what is now known as the Social Security System. Bismarck said that “the State must take the matter in hand, since the State can most easily supply the requisite funds. It must provide them not as alms but in fulfillment of the workers’ right to look to the State where their own good will can achieve nothing more.”[3] Roosevelt and his admirers agreed. P. J. O’Brien, writing in Forward with Roosevelt, links Bismarck’s social policies with those of Roosevelt: “[The quotation by Bismarck] might have been lifted out of a speech by President Roosevelt in 1936, but the Iron Chancellor uttered it in 1871.”[4]

email
Print Friendly
Notes:
  1. William L. Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1960), 96, note. []
  2. Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, 96, note. []
  3. Quoted in P. J. O’Brien, Forward with Roosevelt (Chicago: John C. Winston Co., 1936), 84. []
  4. O’Brien, Forward with Roosevelt, 85. []

Tagged with  
, ,
  • Lee

    Lee I would like to see where the (MONEY) is that the goverment borrowed 3 time from the S.S. system and never paid it back to the system.I beleive that if the goverment dident borrow the money S.S. would still be in good shape. So don't balme the senior for S.S. down fall it's the goverment that made S.S. faol.

  • Debra

    The government messes up everything they touch. Replace the congress and senate with common everyday people. Cut the pay in half. That would fix the spending problem. Replace social security with a privatized system all the while giving the ones who receive benefits now the same thing. Benefits should not be cut down or paid at a later age. I don't care how long Americans live. We were made to pay it in so by all means it should be paid back out to all of us that paid in.

    Do not give it to illegals. Our citizens should be first priority and they are not. THIS IS A SHAME ON THE GOVERNMENT. The way the government and politicians are acting, we should all be marching on Washington with torches and pitchforks.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_YH2ZIQWRJE6OGQ3D435FD5FGTA Hole In One

      Your Social Security: Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older ones) didn’t know this. It’s easy to check out, if you don’t believe it. Be sure and show it to your kids. They need a little history lesson on what’s what . . . . . and it doesn’t matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are Facts!!! Social Security Cards up until the 1980s expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes.Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the message was removed. An old Social Security card with the “NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION” message. Our Social Security Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. He promised: 1.) That participation in the Program would be Completely voluntary, No longer Voluntary 2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program, Now 7.65% .. . . . on the first $90,000 3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year, No longer tax deductible 4.) That the money the participants be put into the independent ‘Trust Fund’ rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program. Under Johnson the money was moved to The General Fund and Spent.5) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income Under Clinton & Gore Up to 85% of your Social Security can be Taxed Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month — and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to ‘put away’ you may be interested in the following:
      Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent ‘Trust Fund’ and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?
      A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate.
      Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
      A: The Democratic Party.
      Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?
      A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the ‘tie-breaking’ deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US
      And until recently, many “do-gooders” FAVORITE leader (???) :
      Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?
      A: That’s right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it .
      Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away! The worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it, and believe that the Democats are “for the people.” If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. Maybe not . . . . . . some Democrats are awfully sure . . . . . of what isn’t so. But it’s worth a try. How many people can YOU send this to? Actions speak louder than bumper stickers. AND CONGRESS GIVES THEMSELVES 100% RETIREMENT FOR ONLY SERVING ONE TERM