You have to love the conspiracy stuff, especially when it comes from the mouth of one of the Illuminati players themselves.
Al Gore, mover and shaker of world climates, was on the "Ellen" show the other day, where he talked about the plan of some of the more Frankensteinian "scientists" in the global warming coterie to blot out the sun.
It went something like this: Ellen said, "There’s a rumor, I don’t know if this is true or not, that some scientists are trying to figure out a way to block the sun to try to slow down global warming."
To which Gore replied, “It’s a measure of the feeling of desperation that some of them feel."
Do you think, Mr. Gore, some of that desperation might have to do with a decades-long propaganda mission to make people afraid of rising sea levels and drowning polar bears?
This is the kind of stuff that gets conservatives barred from all the fancy-shmancy clubs that liberals frequent, top-notch conspiracy theory. I mean, someone or someones unknown planning to blot out the sun? Not since Mr. Burns was shot by Maggie Simpson has something so outrageous been proposed.
A crucial element of the liberal makeup is the ability to pursue ridiculous, world-threatening strategies, then when called on them, pretend like you have no idea what's going on. The look on Gore's face when DeGeneres asked about blocking the sun was the same look the neighborhood vandal gives you when he's standing next to some freshly painted graffiti while holding a spray can.
Council on Foreign Relations, Economic Consultative Committee, Agenda 21 -- DeGeneres may as well have just come right down to it and asked Gore about the Rothschilds or the Greys for all he was willing to give up.
From the Associated Press, April 8, 2009:
"The president's new science adviser said Wednesday that global warming is so dire, the Obama administration is discussing radical technologies to cool Earth's air.
"John Holdren told The Associated Press in his first interview since being confirmed last month that the idea of geoengineering the climate is being discussed.
"One such extreme option includes shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun's rays. Holdren said such an experimental measure would only be used as a last resort.
"'It's got to be looked at,' he said. 'We don't have the luxury of taking any approach off the table.'"
So the "rumor" is actually a plan that the Obama Administration has had on the burner for years, and most of the world has simply overlooked or forgotten about it? Huh. Funny how that works with our media today, even with them thar Interwebs and that data Googly thingy fer lookin' up stuff.
Gore didn't outright deny such schemes are in the works or even already being carried out, but he did feel compelled to disavow the idea when the incredulous Ellen followed up with "Are they really thinking they can do that?"
"Well, some of them are seriously proposing," Gore grudgingly acknowledged, "and I think it’s completely nuts, you know, you put another kind of pollution, sulfur dioxide, up to orbit … cover the atmosphere, the sky won’t be really blue in the way it is now anymore, but it would block out some of the sun’s heat so that we wouldn’t have to take the difficult steps to stop spewing all this global warming pollution into the atmosphere. ... And of course, there are a lot of problems with what they’re proposing. It turns out plants need sunlight."
Plants need sunlight -- we all learned that in Biology 101. But there are levels of survival the machines are willing to accept -- we learned that in the "Matrix" trilogy.
A lot of people have said that such a program to blot out the sun is already being undertaken or at least experimented with, in the form of high-flying aircraft that leave long trails of cloud-like something or other across the sky, which have come to be called chemtrails.
Yeah, yeah, the liberals say. More conspiracy nonsense.
From Reuters, Aug. 31, 2012:
"Planes or airships could carry sun-dimming materials high into the atmosphere for an affordable price tag of below $5 billion a year as a way to slow climate change, a study indicated on Friday.
"Guns, rockets or a pipeline into the stratosphere would be more expensive but generally far cheaper than policies to cut world greenhouse gas emissions, estimated to cost between $200 billion and $2 trillion a year by 2030."
And if you want to keep any of your liberal friends, don't look into something called the Hurricane Aerosol and Microphysics Program, run by the Department of Homeland Security since before the Obama Administration.
So, a scientific study was done of a nonexistent program just for a lark? Is that what the liberals in government and the media expect us to believe?
You can bet your tinfoil hat they do.