Let’s Stop Acting Like There’s a Debate about the 2nd Amendment

After the president, with help from his fraternizers in the deceptive state-run media, somehow won his re-election campaign, I thought it was important to note the first thing Obama and his administration did was turn its attention to the United Nations gun treaty talks.

Hmm, I wonder … If he really had the support of the American people, why is he so busy trying to disarm those who supposedly love him so much?

And all the while Obama and his administration are busy trying to disarm the American people by conjuring up criminals guilty of some sort of gun crimes as an excuse for new gun legislation.

Well, then, let me help: This administration need not look any further than within its own ranks.

And this, friends, is the very reason we are an armed people.

As you know, Attorney General Eric Holder is guilty of putting thousands of assault rifles (AK-47s) into the hands of Mexican drug lords in an attempt to blame the American people for the crimes administration officials are guilty of contriving and committing. As a result, Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was killed, along with hundreds of Mexican civilians, including teens at a birthday party and a Mexican beauty queen.

The state-run media conveniently pulled a media blackout on Fast and Furious, and some Americans gave them a pass and have “forgotten” the atrocities committed upon them by their own government, therefore strengthening tyranny so it might assault the people again on a later date.

The “later date” occurred in Benghazi, when Ambassador Chris Stevens, two Navy SEALs and another U.S. citizen were killed on Sept. 11, 2012.

The Blaze reported:

 “The details of the September 11 attack that killed four Americans at the U.S. consulate in Benghazi are still murky, and there is certainly more to be known.

“Former CIA officer Clare Lopez argues that the key issue is the relationship of the U.S. government, Ambassador Christopher Stevens and the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya with al-Qaida.

“‘That relationship, Lopez argues, could be connected to the rise of Islamic brigades in Syria, who recently created a “Front to Liberate Syria” to wage jihad against the Syrian regime and turn the country into an Islamic state.’”

The Business Insider stated:

“In 2011 the U.S. sold $33.4 billion worth of weapons to Saudi Arabia and $1.7 billion to Qatar as sales tripled to a record high and accounted for nearly 78 percent of all global arms sales.

“‘The opposition groups that are receiving most of the lethal aid are exactly the ones we don’t want to have it,’ one American official familiar with the situation told the New York Times.”

So, America, was Ambassador Stevens gun running to extreme jihadists? Was Eric Holder responsible for putting guns into the hands of Mexican drug cartels? You decide.

Holder has been contriving a gun grab for years. For those who didn’t know, it recently came to light that Holder encouraged the media to “brainwash” the youth about how bad guns are when he was a part of Clinton’s anti-gun administration.

What is interesting here is that the young, through Hollywood and video games, are conveniently taught a “thug” mentality and how to commit crimes. In the meantime, corrupt politicians wait to trample the Constitution and legislate new policies to disarm the American population, leaving them defenseless when the crimes are committed.

Just look at Sandy Hook, Aurora, Columbine, etc.

Thomas Jefferson stated that the whole purpose of government is to “ensure your rights,” not to take them away.

What this administration is attempting to do is exactly what Hitler, Stalin, Mao, or any other dictator has done. They blame the weapon rather than the person committing the crimes and all the while subtly encourage criminal activity.

Friends, this is not about guns; it is about control. And this issue is not to be overlooked, because gun rights stand between a free country and an enslaved, possibly an exterminated, people.

The Second Amendment: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a FREE State, the Right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed [violated].”

According to Federal Statute Title 10, Chapter 13, Section 311 (a), all males between the ages of 17 and 45 who are either citizens of the United States or have declared their intent to become citizens are members of the “unorganized” or reserve militia.

It is time for America to get out of the debate because there is no debate.

We have rights given unto us by our Creator. Period.

President George Washington, when arming the people of the United States of America, said:

“A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.”

We would do well to heed President Washington’s warning, since over 56 million people in the 20th century were exterminated by their own governments under the guise of gun control.

Comments

comments

About Bradlee Dean
Bradlee Dean is an ordained preacher, heavy metal drummer, talk-show host of the Sons of Liberty Radio, and speaks on college and high school campuses with his ministry, You Can Run But You Cannot Hide International.Contact info for Bradlee Dean: Twitter@BradleeDean1 Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/bradlee.dean.7?ref=ts&fref=ts Email: [email protected]
  • Doodlebug

    We are well on our way to needing every American not only with a gun but tons of ammo to save ourselves from our own government saying to hell with the Constitution and to hell with the American people, I want to rule and I WILL RULE! Another Civil War is right on our doorstep. WAKE UP AMERICA ESPECIALLY THOSE OF YOU WHO VOTED FOR THIS DUMMICRAT DONKEY (JA)!

  • patriotusa2

    One of the first things that a dictatorial country does is to confiscate any and all firearms from their people. There are several countries who have taken weapons away from their people and Nazi Germany is just one. They can control the people much more effectively if they don't have to worry about getting shot in the process. Obama and his liberal army are now taking advantage of the terrible tragedies we've had to try to implement the same in this country.

    • TheSunDidIt

      Some may have issue with stopping US personnel who try to enforce such illegal and Un-Constitutional actions. But, there is a day coming when the UN, the Mexican hordes (as part of the UN) and the Chinese will eventually try to take our freedom too. Think not? Just think the whole process and issue through logically and carefully. It's the same as, "I'm driving too fast. If I stomp on the breaks on an icy road, my stopping distance is reduced. If it's reduced and I'm also driving too fast, I'll now slide into another car, a building, a pole, a pedestrian or some other object." It's the old science thing of "If this, then that".

      • patriotusa2

        Oh, don't I know it! You can see it coming already and unfortunately China knows that we can't pay them back all the money that's been borrowed and which Obama is still borrowing. The day is coming that they'll want our country in payment of their debt and if anyone thinks that can't happen - they're in denial. China has already taken some of our land, bit by bit, and with all their cyber stealing - they'll have all our military secrets as well.

    • 7papa7

      Before long the only place you will be able to get guns is in Mexico where justice sells them. They would prefer guns in the hands of drug cartels than in the hands of law abiding Americans.

      • patriotusa2

        Yeah! Just a bunch of twisted sisters running this country.

    • edc

      There is NO debate, the right to bear arms is a God given RIGHT, not a government priviledge to allow or not allow. If the government doesn't like it, then let it ask us, WE THE PEOPLE, if we will give away our rights. My answer is NO, NO No!

      • patriotusa2

        Really! Well you could have fooled me! The problem is that they are not asking "we the people" about too much these days and their remarks about the Constitution displays a lack of respect for something they consider "outdated. There's been a lot of people that voted no at the polls for things they didn't want and the liberal courts reversed their decision. Time will tell what happens with the gun situation, but screaming "NO, NO, NO" doesn't grant us too much headway these days.

        • http://www.facebook.com/robertsgunshop Robert Fowler

          No, but slow sustained fire will.

        • patriotusa2

          That will definitely do it.

      • Shermer

        God said you can have guns?

        • Jerry Strickland

          No God said we have the right to defend our family. How is left up to us.

  • http://www.facebook.com/lorna.doone.319 Lorna Doone

    With immigration amnesty knocking at our door, no sealed borders, a fragile economy ready to collapse, an illegal President sitting in office, a third of the American people out of work,
    corporations ready to go out of business, more layoffs expected, another housing bubble expected, the price of energy ready to go through the roof, can summarize why they want to strip American citizens of guns, so when the SHTF we won't be able to defend ourselves
    and will become slaves of the state!

  • http://www.facebook.com/lorna.doone.319 Lorna Doone
  • http://www.facebook.com/lorna.doone.319 Lorna Doone
    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Carl-Stevenson/100002324175685 Carl Stevenson

      No ... Try 262 million ... 262 MILLION people murdered BY THEIR OWN GOVERNMENTS in the 20th century – AFTER they allowed those governments to disarm them. See: http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/20TH.HTM
      They ALL thought “It can’t happen here” – until they were disarmed and it started, then it was too late. Don’t make the same mistake. Don’t EVER let your government disarm you.

  • Screeminmeeme

    Even a five year old knows that you don't give weapons to our enemies. It's akin to committing suicide.

    Advocating for terrorists and sympathizing with our enemies is all that Obama and his simpering lackeys have done from day one. He is accomplishing what he has always planned~~~~~to bring America to its knees before a gloating world.

    There's only one solution to his tyranny and treason.

    Only one.

    • Shermer

      What's that solution, Meme?

      • Screeminmeeme

        Shermer.....Impeachment and then a speedy trial for treason. What did ya think I meant?

        • Shermer

          Just checking that you're still in possession of your senses...

  • http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ Ted R. Weiland

    History demonstrates the Second Amendment is not only up for debate but much more. In fact, the very amendment that contains the phrase "shall not be infringed" is the most infringed, licensed, and limited of the entire twenty seven. Time to figure out the Second Amendment has not, cannot, and will not protect firearms.

    Why is this? Because the framers essentially forfeited the God-expected responsibility for a Constitutional right. Rights are optional whereas God-expected responsibilities (such as found in 1 Timothy 5:8, which includes bearing arms in defense of ourselves, families, and neighbors) are non-optional.

    Ask yourselves, which are more easily infringed: Constitutional rights or God-expected responsibilities? History has already answered that question.

    For more, see blog article "You Can't Win Bringing a Knife [the Second Amendment] to a Gunfight" at http://www.constitutionmythbusters.org/you-cant-win-bringing-a-knife-to-a-gunfight/.

    Then, also check out "Rights, Rights, Everyone Wants Their Rights."

    • rycsailor

      You make a typical error, suppose the people involved with obliterating the 2nd amendment don't believe in a god only in the power of politics?

      • http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ Ted R. Weiland

        No mistake at all. I recognize that as a very likely scenario. However, my purpose is twofold" First, I principally preach and write to our generation with two or three generations down the road in mind that perhaps we can begin to lay the groundwork for a future generation of yours and my posterity to be able to do it right(eous) the next time.

        Also, we may very well be facing a time during our lifetimes where they try to confiscate our weapons and if they do, people whose convictions are based upon non-optional God-expected responsibilities rather than optional rights will be much more likely not to turn in their weapons.

        • Davy Crockett

          He does this because he wants to blame all our problems we have today on the Christian Founding Fathers instead of facing the fact that we got ourselves in this mess by not vigilantly maintaining and building upon what they started. He also is saying this because he was wants to tear down our government and constitution and establish a theocracy as they had in the Book of Judges. A government and country which was constantly being conquered, enslaved and invaded. You can learn more about his theology of Preterism at the link below:

          http://www.according2prophecy.org/Preterism.html

        • http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ Ted R. Weiland

          Nehemiah 6:8

        • Davy Crockett

          This is not answer folks, it is a complete dodge of a legitimate argument. Perhaps he has no answer then?

        • http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ Ted R. Weiland

          Nehemiah 6:8 with Proverbs 26:5

        • Davy Crockett

          I am "blind" and I am a "fool". There he goes again folks, hurling insults without any answers.

        • http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ Ted R. Weiland

          Actually, I was giving you the benefit of the doubt by using Proverbs 26:5 instead of Proverbs 26:4.

        • Davy Crockett

          “If anyone advocates a different doctrine and does not agree with sound words, those of our Lord Jesus Christ, and with the doctrine conforming to godliness, he is conceited and understands nothing; but he has a morbid interest in controversial questions and disputes about words, out of which arise envy, strife, abusive language, evil suspicions, and constant friction between men of depraved mind and deprived of the truth, who suppose that godliness is a means of gain. (1Tim. 6:3-5)

        • http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ Ted R. Weiland

          Is this a confession?

        • Davy Crockett

          Ok I can see I have wasted enough pearls here

  • Harold

    Obabler and company is trying to turn America into another Nazi State, paterned after Aolph Hitlers reign of terrior.

    • foxxybey

      Harold, I can see you have read real history my friend and most of those who support obozo don't have a clue he is leading them to a nazi plantation filled with all races and colors and him as master-in-chief. God Bless and keep your powder dry:

  • good160

    Why obama want's our gun's you can't be a dictator with an armed plubic. There that's it in a nut shell.So don't ask again.

  • foxxybey

    No debate from me, want mine, come and get them, I will not live in a nazi country and will die first.

  • http://www.facebook.com/everett.conrad.52 Everett Conrad

    Boycott the news media. I never watch any of them anyway. Nothing but lies lies lies...Burn them out!

    • Uptite

      O'bummah Sheep!

  • CHARLES

    we
    can stop it right now if we can get the sheriffs and the military to do
    their jobs. All the people that are entering bills , campaigning for
    gun control and those that voted for and helped pass the existing
    unconstitutional laws are guilty of at least CONSPIRACY TO SUBVERT THE
    CONSTITUTION and probably TREASON and more.

    . all we have to do is
    have the local sheriff arrest them and charge them with conspiracy to subvert
    the constitution and treason and any other charges that can be made.
    then hold them without bail for trial. then if convicted an immediate
    public execution. also should have ALL in government (state, local,
    federal, all), from obummer to the janitor that are working to subvert
    or constitution and those that have voted for the current regulations
    that subvert the 2nd amendment immediately arrested and jailed and held
    without bond for trial, then if convicted an immediate PUBLIC
    EXECUTION. It would only take one execution to see them all backpedal.
    but alas for them it would be too late. but good for the country
    And if the sheriff wont do it , the military should.

  • Seeker1212

    This entire ruse about guns and automatic weapons is the typical Three Card Monte that the liberal underground plays to keep the American citizens from focusing on the liberals real intentions of destroying another constitutional amendment.

    The State Government has the authority to repel any and all federal laws that are unconstitutional. The citizens of all states should send a strong message to their local government, starting with the state legislators.

  • Brabado

    There is NO gun control debate!
    The issue is clearly covered by the 2nd. Amendment of our U.S. Consitituion - Live with it!
    The White House, Parasite Democrats and their minions, are the ones that are interested in debating this non-issue: America is not!
    The REAL debate is about Holder's cover-up gun running operation in Mexico, santioned by Obama's Executive Order pass. That is the real debate. Wake up Ameica...
    IN GOD WE TRUST TO ILUMINATE THE LIES OF GOV. CUOMO, OF N.Y.!

  • http://www.facebook.com/tara.s.fischer Tara Skaggs Fischer

    Taking guns away from American citizens and giving them to questional countries. sigh

  • freedomringsforall

    Yeah Amen

    We are one step away from a total dictatorship
    The 2nd Amendment.

  • Brama

    My dad, who claims to be a conservative, is beginning to cave to the argument about the need for people to own assault rifles. I said to him... "You know why WE should have the right to own assault rifles, dad?... because the government can own them too, and it is protected by the second amendment." Any time there is any kind of exception to the second amendment, you move that much closer to making the government a thug instead of a public servant. The right to own guns is a two-sided auxiliary coin. On one side is a foreign threat, the other side is domestic. And the coin is issued by the constitution.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Carl-Stevenson/100002324175685 Carl Stevenson

      Tell your dad, "I saw a movie once where only the police and military had guns. It was called SCHINDLER'S LIST."
      If he hasn't see the movie, make him watch it.
      When he tells you "That could never happen here!" Have him read this quote:

      "Anyone who tells you that 'It Can't Happen Here' is whistling past the graveyard of history. There is no 'house rule' that bars tyranny coming to America. History is replete with republics whose people grew complacent and descended into imperial butchery and chaos." -- Mike Vanderboegh

      • Brama

        Yeah... we've seen it. Powerful movie. Most violent crimes are committed with handguns... which makes the move to limit assault rifles that much more insidious... they know that it's not the majority of guns that people use, so they know they can get away with it easier than with handguns... but it is just one more inch we are giving them if we cave in.

  • gypsy314

    Impeach Obama and crew would be a good start

  • freedixie

    Like I told the treasonous Senator Tom Coburn, there IS NOTHING TO DEBATE! The Constitution is quite clear. But he will fold like a lawn chair on this, and other traitors will too. We have no, none, ZERO representation in Washington. What we have is a gaggle of mealy-mouthed, lying, backstabbing, out-for-themselves traitors who have turned a deaf ear to all our protests on various unconstitutional issues. They vote for legislation that violates the Constitution, thereby making them inelligible to continue to hold their office due to the violation of the oath they took. They need to be arrested, tried, and hung. It's time to water the tree of liberty.

  • A. G. T. Jr.

    We The People must be aware now that everytime numero uno and numero dos open their mouths, there is always treachery and toxin involved in it. And everytime a piece of hair twists in Holder's moustache, deceit and racism preponderate.

  • Tom Ralles

    GET REAL!
    Republicans need to have some minimal understanding of the hierarchy of threats and issues. Local laws in states like New York or Colorado do not compare in any way to the threat of Federal legislation on gun control and on every other domestic issue that does not belong to the Federal government. Even the discussion at the Federal level should raise a red flag with every citizen, gun owner or not.
    The great experiment of our Constitution is that if one State believes it is safer to have armed guards in schools and citizens of another State feel it is better to reduce the abusive practices (like drups in homes) that create the conditions for abused children who become "raging" adults, then we not only have some good choices about where we want to raise our families, but also, the States and their citizens can again begin to learn from these varied "experiments".

  • Jim

    Why do any of you of us even get involved with this debate (2nd amendment) It would take a special act of congress to amend or delete the 2nd amendment and then 3/4 of the states would have to approve it. Everyone can talk all they want but this is NOT going to happen and there is not one damn thing Obama or any of his thugs can do about it. So lets stop fighitng over something that has so little chance of happening as to be non-existant. All of these arguments are nothing but smoke screens designed to distract the public from the real issues.

    • freedixie

      Remember his Executive Orders, especially the one called NDAA? It's illegal, and it violates the Constitution, but he intends to use it. This is why we need our governors and sheriffs to stand up for the Constitution and refuse to enforce any unconstitutional "laws". There are many things happening which are contrary to the Constitution, such as the person occupying the White House not being elligible to hold his office due to not being a natural born citizen, but our traitors in Congress have not lifted one finger to oppose this. They will aid him in his gun control efforts too. They have no intention of amending the Constitution; they intend to ride roughshod over it. They need to be exterminated like the vermin they are.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_O24NYT5HOQNDEJ3TUT5QOTLOF4 TM

    Screw the UN and that sissified BOY barack hussein obama community organizer from hell.
    We should demand that we get out of the American hating UN as all they are good for is holding out their dirty stinking hands for money to give to countries that hates our guts and want to kill us, sound like obama cronies to me.

  • MikeyParks

    He's right. Just being willing to debate makes it seem like there's room for debate. There's isn't. You don't debate the Bill of Rights.

  • jimbuzzell

    Any debate is moot, in order to change the 2nd amendment it requires 3/4 of all states to ratifiy anything that comes out of congress and the white house that rises to the amendment process once has passed all three, the house, the senate, and the president. What are the chances if that ever happening?

    • Bruce Lytle

      Think about how the 17th amendment came about! How did they get 2/3's of the Senators to vote for it, how did they get 3/4 of the states to ratify it, giving up their say in congress? Hmmmm?

  • American Patriot

    We need to organize and we will have the largest army in the world and no Obama Marxist government would withstand Us.

  • Allen Morgan

    Bradlee, thank you for reminding me the 2nd Admendment is not open to debate. It is. Not to the sacrelegious, but that would be like debating some other truism, truth which is empirical such as debating whether there is a God or whether we are guaranteed "inaleniable rights" but our Constitution.

    I had a similar discussion just recently with a public (government) school principal who was thinking about whether to allow students to pray on school grounds. I reminded the principal that each student is guaranteed the freedom of speech by our U.S. Constitution. Judges throughout decades now have always decided that a student's rights do not stop at the school house door. Not to disrupt instruction, but students have the freedom of speech in and out of the classroom, at lunch time, at recess, etc. That freedom of speech includes the freedom to pray, even to pray in the name above every other name, the name by which we are saved, that blessed name of Jesus. So students throughout Louisiana are being reminded of their rights as we (and others such as Liberty Council) remind school principals of the rights of students.

    We all need to be reminded by you and by others that we have a guaranteed right which is as important as our freedom of speech, and that is our freedom and right to bear arms. Not just militias, not just rifles, but arms, including hand guns. We have that guaranteed right. We may have to fight leftists, petty wanna-be dictators, political parties, communists, or others from time to time to keep those rights protected, but we should remember these are our rights, our freedoms.

    Thank you again Bradlee.

  • HerrCapitanFick

    You people are lazy gutless wonders that will do what the Government says! The gov will take your brats out and start stringing them up 3 and 4 at a time! Now go back to sleep!

  • wdcraftr

    If Govt can just regulate the 2nd Amendment without us saying NO, then they can just as easily Amend the 1st Amendment, and say you can't criticize your Govt, your President, Muslims. ALL 2nd Amendment laws and regulations Are Unconstitutional already... I'd much rather a Crazy person get a gun, than Me Not Get One.... I will not sacrifice Freedom for Safety...

    • Uptite

      Well, that's exactly what I am advocating here...if we let these pigs have their way with one amendment, they will attack the rest, one at a time. ... to suit their fancy, socialist, liberal agendas - but more importantly, to show us who's in "control".

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Carl-Stevenson/100002324175685 Carl Stevenson

        The problem with your approach is that, once they have disarmed everyone, nobody will be able to stop them from trashing all other rights as well.

        • Uptite

          Hello!
          IS that not what I said?
          You betcha -In no uncertain terms...

          What's your fix?

  • ed357

    Arm the jihadists..........

    Then wage a continual war against the armed jihadists.......

    Somebody is making a ton of money.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mark-Ward/100000135233619 Mark Ward

    Banning Guns (from Law Abiding Citizens) to "combat Gun Violence" makes as much sense as battling Illegal Drug Use by banning Prescription Drugs!

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Carl-Stevenson/100002324175685 Carl Stevenson

      Taking guns away from law-abiding citizens because criminals sometimes misuse them is like having yourself castrated because you honk the neighbors have too many kids.

  • Friscolady

    There is absolutely no debate when they come for our firearms it will be time to fertilize the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants!

    To whomever thinks they can take our firearms - quit talking about it and try it! The tree of liberty needs to be fed!

  • wildeagleone

    The local governments is the place to start and then work our way to D.C.

  • johnnyu

    I'm moving to Texas...... we can all draw the line there... the new Alamo... there motto.. is... COME AND TAKE IT .......if you can.. you will have to pry it from my cold dead hand

  • Arizona_Don

    First I would like to make one correction to Mr Dean’s, excellent biog. During the 20th century there were more then 170 million citizens murdered by their governments not 56 million. It is true many were not murdered by guns however, they should not be ignored because starvation and gassing was used instead of shooting. All were able to be murdered because guns had been confiscated, consequently the fact they had been denied a means of self-protection or defense the end result was identical regardless of the method.

    REF:http://libertycrier.com/front-page/innocents-betrayed-genocide-by-gun-control-true-history-of-gun-confiscation/

    Many who advocate gun control ask the question "who needs an assault weapon?" I would like to take this opportunity to provide an answer to that question.

    The second amendment is a part of our bill of rights not a part of our bill of needs. These rights were as described within our constitution bestowed upon us by our creator (God) not government and they remain inalienable. Government therefore cannot take them away. Furthermore, as has been bemoaned by this president on many occasions, the constitution restricts centralized government not citizens. To interpret it any other way is totally wrong and can only lead to armed conflict. The second amendment was put in place to prevent exactly what the current government is attempting to do. And if it, centralized federal government under the leadership of Barack Obama, pursues infringement against the second amendment of our constitution, millions of citizens will rise up. The United States of America is not a democracy it is a Democratic Republic. A nation of laws not men! The line in the sand has been drawn and must not be crossed. Any further action is and should be considered a violation of the oath of office of this president and a high crime. Certainly a reason for removal.

    It is not just a right for the citizens to rise up and curtail all actions to illegally circumvent the constitution it is a duty of free men everywhere in these United States. An example must be made against the move to infringe upon the rights of the citizens of this country, if not the future of this nation is not secure.

    This president has over the last four years said one thing in an effort to secure support and then done the opposite by systematically pursuing unconstitutional goals by unconstitutional means. That must no longer be tolerated and congress must begin to act to curtail these illegal actions. Fast and Furious and the Benghazi incident are but two examples.

    The method of changing the constitution is set out within the constitution and must not be infringed in any way. Restricting the second amendment is an infringement and must not be tolerated by congress.

  • Angrymike

    Excellent article, posted...........;)

  • Rabelrouser
  • http://www.facebook.com/dawn.pegis Dawn Pegis

    I think it should be emphasized that those citizens who have guns are both "armed and DISCIPLINED!" THis is true in many cases, but sadly in our culture it is lacking. I am glad we have the 2nd ammendment. I just wish we had education free from the 'state'

  • Sgt bubba

    Obama and Holder are using Hitlers gun control verbatum. Look up Nazi gun control and see the same language as Obama is using.

  • v steve

    We are in a war over our country`s freedom and the enemy is Communist President barack hussein obama and the Communist in our congress and we have been losing the war for the past 4 + years. We took a big fall when Communist President barack hussein obama was reelected. If we don`t defeat them in the 2014 election we might lose the war, our freedom.