Tim Cook is the CEO of Apple. He has sex with men. I’m not revealing anything about him that he has not revealed about himself. Here’s what he said:
“While I have never denied my sexuality, I haven’t publicly acknowledged it either, until now. So let me be clear: I’m proud to be gay, and I consider being gay among the greatest gifts God has given me.”
“Proud to be gay”? What does that mean?
Cook’s statement reveals something about how the same-sex sexuality movement defines itself. Cook states that he never denied his “sexuality.” A pedophile and an adulterer could say the same thing. There are millions of people who argue that that they are “proud” of their behavior.
By the way, homosexuals get very upset when pedophilia is used as an example of another form of “sexual preference.” Consider the following:
“‘Paedophilic interest is natural and normal for human males,’ said the presentation. ‘At least a sizeable minority of normal males would like to have sex with children … Normal males are aroused by children.’
“The statement that paedophilia is ‘natural and normal’ was made not three decades ago but last July . It was made not in private but as one of the central claims of an academic presentation delivered, at the invitation of the organisers, to many of the key experts in the field at a conference held by the University of Cambridge.
“Other presentations included ‘Liberating the paedophile: a discursive analysis,’ and ‘Danger and difference: the stakes of hebephilia.’
“Hebephilia is the sexual preference for children in early puberty, typically 11 to 14-year-olds.”
Could the day come when discriminating against pedophile behavior and pedophile marriages will bring about leftist outrage? Ted Kennedy, Chuck Schumer, Barbara Boxer, Harry Reid, and 93 other senators signed the national Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) in 1993. That was only 22 years ago. A lot could change in another 22 years. Pedophilia could be mainstreamed.
I and millions of other people believe same-sex sexuality is immoral, anti-science, and irrational. The Bible states that it is “unnatural” (Rom. 1:26-27) in terms of biology and thereby irrational.
Those who reject the Bible have nothing from which to argue in order to make their case for anything. In fact, in evolutionary terms, same-sex sexuality is contrary to evolution. Tim’s Cook’s DNA will stop with him. If he attempts to find a surrogate, he will only be admitting that same-sex sexuality is “unnatural.”
Religious freedom laws protect everybody. They are not about discriminating against anybody. The word “homosexual” does not appear anywhere in any of the religious freedom laws, and that includes Indiana’s law which is very similar to the national law that was signed by Bill Clinton in 1993 with almost unanimous consent from Congress (only three no votes).
It’s not surprising that Tim Cook “does not quote a single word from any of the religious freedom laws he denounces” which are an extension of the First Amendment, you know, that pesky right from the Constitution that has served our nation well for more than 230 years.
To do so will lead to a lot of explaining. Better to throw the elephant.
Why were these new state laws necessary? Because of people like Tim Cook who wants to cut down the Liberty Tree of clear thinking and impose his will on the vast majority of Americans by force of law. Cook is a bigot and hypocrite who wants to force people to believe like he does and at the same time call for a boycott of those who don’t.
This is done by forcing people to accept certain behaviors they believe are contrary to their worldview. Everybody should have this freedom. Cook and others are calling for a boycott of Indiana saying they refuse to do business with the state. They are free to do so, but if a baker wants to boycott a same-sex wedding, it’s a criminal offense.
The irony is thick with these people.
These religious freedom laws were written for people like Barronelle Stutzman, owner of Arlene’s Flowers, “who declined to provide flowers for a same-sex wedding because of her Christian belief in traditional marriage.” She “has been fined $1,001 by a Washington court and will be held liable to pay the legal fees incurred by the gay couple, which could ‘devastate’ her financially. . . . Stutzman is still at risk of losing her retirement savings and business as she will be responsible for paying the legal fees and damages incurred by Ingersoll and Freed, who were represented by the ACLU.”
Her “crime”? Not agreeing that same-sex marriage is legitimate marriage. So who’s the bigot? It’s multi-billionaire Tim Cook who will not allow people like Barronelle Stutzman to believe in a way different from him.
UPDATE from the Gateway Pundit: “Cook may believe Indiana’s new law is very dangerous towards gays… But it’s not as dangerous as the several countries Apple does business with where they execute gays.”
Four of the ten countries where they kill homosexuals Apple does business with:
- Saudi Arabia