Why Cher Hates Sarah Palin and Called Her the C-Word

Liberals are always talking about the war on women. Nonsense. Abortion alone kills more women every year than car accidents, school shootings, and drug overdoses.

Liberal rhetoric about conservative women is downright abusive. Liberals are at war with women who challenge their ideology.

Secretary of Education Arne Duncan attacked suburban “white suburban moms” who opposed elements of the Common Core Curriculum.

Ed Schultz called Laura Ingraham a “right-wing slut.”

Martin Bashir called Sarah Palin the country’s “resident dunce” and a “world-class idiot.” But Bashir’s absolutely vile characterization Palin when he said the following in response to her comments of equating debt to a form of slavery:

“When Mrs. Palin invokes slavery, she doesn’t just prove her rank ignorance. She confirms if anyone truly qualified for a dose of discipline from Thomas Thistlewood, she would be the outstanding candidate.”

And what is the “Darby Dose of discipline” from Thomas Thistelewood that Bashir had in mind for Palin? To have her “well flogged and pickled” and then have someone “sh** in [her] mouth.”Cher_Palin_Tweet

And it’s not just liberal men who are attacking conservative women. Cher has got in the act by attacking Sarah Palin calling her the “C-word.” Here was her Tweet:

“Go to dictionary & look up The “C” Word,….next 2 the definition… you’ll see a Pic of Sarah PALIN ! NO…WAIT …SHES UNDER DUMB C WORD.

I wasn’t too long ago that Cher described conservatives as “RW Misogynistic Cretins.” A misogynist is someone who dislikes who hates women and girls. Given Cher’s abusive Tweets, who’s declared a war on women? It’s not Sarah Palin.

So what’s got Cher in such a vile mood over Sarah Palin? There are three reasons. First, Sarah Palin is effective. Her message resonates with people who believe their political, moral, and cultural concerns are ignored by Democrats and Republicans. Cher and her liberal friends wouldn’t be attacking Palin if she wasn’t energizing the base scaring Democrats.

Second, Cher is projecting her grief over her daughter’s sexual mutilation. Sarah Palin represents everything her daughter and her family are not. Cher is envious. An envious person is a destroyer. Since Cher can’t have what Sarah Palin has, Cher has to insure that the Palins can’t have it either, so she denigrates with the worst possible sexual epithet she had hurl.

Third, Cher feels guilty for contributing to her daughter’s sexual confusion. Chastity has become the sexually mutilated “Chaz.” Chastity wrote in her memoir The End of Innocence (2003) that when she was 11 years old she was sexually seduced by “Joan,” a lesbian friend of Cher’s who had become Chastity’s sexual confidant. What was her mother’s reaction to the statutory lesbian rape of her prepubescent daughter?: “This will be a good life experience for you.” Chastity/Chaz writes:

“My mom wasn’t always around, since she was working, so Joan [Cher’s lesbian friend] sort of filled in that gap … I just focused on the fact that I wasn’t getting enough attention, and I often felt lonely or abandoned. When I spent time with Joan, I felt like the center of attention…” (10–11).

Chastity wasn’t born a man. She was looking for love, affection, and someone to care for her. Her molestation so messed with her mind that she didn’t know who she was. Liberals have turned Chastity into a cause célèbre to further their cultural transformation agenda. One by one the old moral taboos are being retrofitted just like Chastity was retrofitted into becoming Chaz.

Slamming a woman like Sarah Palin is the only way Cher can deal with her own guilt. By tearing down a loving mother and wife like Sarah Palin, Cher hopes to elevate her own perverse lifestyle. Cher hates Sarah Palin because in Palin she sees the family she wishes she had but destroyed by her immoral lifestyle and neglect of her daughter.

It wasn’t the Right Wing the messed up Chastity; it was the Left Wing. They are the real misogynists who war against real women.