Georgia Judge Hears Testimony on Obama’s Eligibility Challenge

In Georgia, state law gives the Georgia Secretary of State the right to question or challenge any candidate’s qualifications for holding public office or appearing on state ballots.  The same law also says that any “elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate” has the authority to question or challenge the qualifications of any candidate.

A small group of Georgia voters have taken advantage of that law to question Barack Hussein Obama’s qualifications for holding the office of President of the United States and whether or not he is qualified to appear on the 2012 ballot for the entire state of Georgia.  These citizens are represented by a few different lawyers who are each presenting arguments before Judge Michael Malihi of the Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings.

Undoubtedly this will be the most influential hearing in Malihi’s career so far and probably ever.

With the legal challenge to his eligibility, Obama had been subpoenaed to appear at the hearings, but being the elitist he is, he flatly defied the court order and dismissed the whole affair as nonsense.  Not only did Obama refuse to attend, but neither did his attorney.  They also refused to comply with a subpoena by Malihi for Obama’s records.  Instead, his attorney sent a letter to the judge telling him that he was just letting attorney’s run amok.  Once again, our president demonstrates to the general public that he considers himself to be above the law.

You may have expected most of the testimony to be centered on Obama’s birth certificate issue that has never been fully resolved.  The White House has produced three, the last of which was supposed to be a copy of the actual certificate on record, but that copy was typed on two different typewriters and some of the terminology used was not used at the time of Obama’s birth.

The main focus of the testimony presented to the court involved the fact that Obama’s father was a Kenyan citizen at the time of Barak’s birth and that eliminates him from being a ‘natural born citizen.’  Attorney’s cited the 14th Amendment and an 1875 Supreme Court opinion that stated,

”The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”

Herb Titus, has served as a special assistant US attorney with the DOJ and has taught constitutional and common law for over 30 years.  He commented on the trial saying that the strongest argument against Obama’s eligibly lies with the fact the Obama’s father was not a US citizen and that there is no way that Obama can qualify as a natural born citizen and it is this one principle fact of the case that should settle the question once and for all.

Interestingly, Obama’s supporters claim that the question of his eligibility is a moot point since he was elected by the general public, thus making him ‘vetted’ by the American public.  What they fail to realize is that if it is proven that he is not eligible to hold the office, Obama could and should be arrested and convicted of holding office under false pretenses and impersonating the President of the United States, both of which are felonies.

And you know who’s watching the Georgia hearing very carefully?  Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio who has his own ongoing investigation into Obama’s eligibility.  Arpaio’s investigation has caused Obama to sick Attorney General Eric Holder after Arpaio on trumped up charges of racial profiling.

We all need to pray that Judge Malihi will have the courage to make the right legal decision and rule the man now occupying the White House to be ineligible to hold that office and give him an immediate eviction notice.