Hillary Content with No Clear Strategy to Fight ISIS


Most of the commentary I’ve read about last weekend’s Democratic debate said that Hillary did a great job and handled herself well. However, there are two points that revealed her true feelings on ISIS.

First of all, like most other liberals, she used the term ‘IS’ instead of the more popular term ‘ISIS’ for the Islamic terrorist group. IS just means Islamic State, where ISIS means Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. Another popular term is ISIL meaning Islamic State of Iraq and Levant; Levant referring to the geographical term for the eastern shore of the Mediterranean that takes in Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Jordan and Palestine.

Obama and Clinton often use IS since it is considered to be the politically correct version, which is appropriate because ‘politically correct’ just means that it’s a term liberals prefer because it softens or hides the truth.

More importantly, speaking about the fight against ISIS Hillary stated:

“We now finally are where we need to be.”

“We have a strategy and a commitment to go after ISIS, which is a danger to us as well as the region.”

“And we finally have a UN Security Council Resolution bringing the world together to go after a political transition in Syria.”

From everything I’ve heard and read lately, the US had no clear plan on what to do about ISIS. Some are calling for boots on the ground troops to route them and destroy them while others say bombing them in coalition with France and Russia is sufficient and even others say to sit back and let France and Russia bomb them as we spend our resources securing our borders.

So what strategy is Hillary referring to?

I hate to think what Hillary’s strategy would be. She worked with Barack Obama to support the Islamic terrorist group Muslim Brotherhood as they terrorized Egypt. In fact, Hillary and Obama have been charged with crimes against humanity in international court for their support of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood. And don’t forget that Hillary’s closest aide when she was Secretary of State was Huma Abedin whose mother is a ranking member of the Muslim Sisterhood, the female counterpart of the Muslim Brotherhood.

At least two of the Republican presidential hopefuls are also taking issue with Hillary’s comment about ISIS. Jeb Bush took to Twitter where he tweeted:

“No @HillaryClinton – We are not ‘where we need to be’ in fight against ISIS.”

Carly Fiorina told the media:

“Incredible — honestly, somehow a UN resolution about Syria puts us where we need to be? I think it’s a reflection of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama’s beliefs that our foreign policy gets set by others.”

Hillary also stated during the debate that once Assad agrees to step down as Syria’s dictator that the Syrian rebels will help take on ISIS instead of fighting against Assad.

Oh really? I believe she said that Libya’s rebels would be America’s friends if we helped them take down Khadafy. Those new found friends are the ones that stormed the US Embassy compound in Benghazi and murdered Ambassador Stevens and the other three brave Americans stationed there. Those new found friends are the same ones that just kicked out an American special operations group that were there to help Libya.

Like Obama, Americans need to ask Hillary Clinton where her loyalties really lie. She has worked hard to help Muslims, including Islamic terrorists while treating Americans like second class citizens. She’s happy with NOT having any clear strategy to take on ISIS which means the terrorist group will continue murdering, destroying and pillaging everyone they can. Hillary Clinton has no business running for president when she is more loyal to foreigners than Americans and her statements at the DNC debate prove it.

Previous Vehicle Used in Mass Attack. Do We Need More Vehicle Control Laws?
Next Hillary Clinton says Americans are Wrong and She is Right on Gun Control

Comment