New York Times Prints Benghazi Fable To Help Hillary Win In 2016

On September 11, 2012, Muslim extremists attacked the US consulate compound in Benghazi, Libya.  The attack resulted in the deaths of US Ambassador Christopher Stevens, Information Management Officer Sean Smith and Security Officers Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods.

Immediately after the attack, conflicting reports of what happened were being given by the White House and State Department.  At first they blamed the attack on Muslims that were protesting a garage-made anti Muslims video.  Then they said the video had nothing to do with the attack and that it was an assault by Muslim extremists.

Over the past year, we keep hearing new and different versions of what took place.  Emails later surfaced that indicated that Stevens had made numerous requests for more and better security for the Benghazi consulate, stating that tensions were high in the area and there was sufficient reason to fear an attack.  The State Department repeatedly ignored or refused to act on those requests, hanging Stevens out to be Hillary Clinton’s sacrificial lamb for her Muslim friends.

Don’t forget that Hillary’s closet aid and confidant, Huma Abedin is the daughter of a member of the Muslim Sisterhood with connections to a number of Muslim extremists.  If Hillary knew about the vulnerability of the Benghazi compound, then so did Abedin and quite possibly her mother.

At one point early on, Hillary, then Secretary of State, said publicly:

“As I have said many times, I take responsibility.”

But has she?  There has been a plethora of information to show that she did know about the situation in Benghazi although she denied any knowledge.   Whistleblowers on Benghazi were threatened to be quiet or lose their jobs.

Hillary Clinton, along with President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and then Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta told the parents and families of the Benghazi victims that they would keep them up to date on what transpired and how their loved ones died.  But the last I heard, that never happened.  In fact Patricia Smith and Charles Woods testified before Congress about how they have been treated and lied to.  Just prior to their testimony, the Democrats that were present in the hearing chamber got up and left the room.

It seems that although Hillary said she will accept all responsibility, everyone around her has been doing everything possible to cover up her involvement in Benghazi as they know if the truth were to be made known that it would kill her 2016 presidential aspirations.  That is clearly evident by the extensive report on Benghazi that was published in last Sunday’s New York Times.

Supposedly after conducting a thorough investigation, the Times reported that the White House account of what happened at Benghazi were factual and accurate and that Hillary Clinton had no knowledge of the requests for more security or the events leading up to the fatal attack.  In fact, the Times account says that the attack was the result of a protest over the anti-Muslim video and had nothing to do with Muslim extremists or terrorists.

Family Research Council Senior Fellow for National Security Bob Maginnis says the Times article is nothing more than a cover-up to protect Hillary’s 2016 presidential bid.  In an interview with OneNewsNow, Maginnis said that Hillary has ‘blood all over her hands’ due to what happened at Benghazi.  He went to say:

“But I’m not surprised. The New York Times has been the mouthpiece of the liberal agenda for a long time, and Hillary Clinton, of course, is their favorite candidate for the presidency in the near future, so they rewrite history.”

“They can neutralize the issue by creating a significant doubt among the electorate, which is typically uniformed about these things.  Then they’ve taken a weapon out of the hands of their opponents, the Republican who might bring up Benghazi.”

Because of the Times cover-up story, Maginnis doesn’t believe that Benghazi will be a problem for Hillary in 2016 and that it probably wouldn’t do Republicans much good to bring it up.

I disagree!

I would definitely bring it up and charge the New York Times with purposely printing lies to make Hillary look good and take the blame off of her.  I would also question Clinton’s choice of Huma Abedin as her personal aid and confidant.  I would also bring up the facts that Egyptian lawyers are talking about filing charges against Hillary for her role in supporting and aiding the Muslim Brotherhood and their crimes against the Egyptian people and humanity.  I would use the testimony of Naglaa Mahmoud, the wife of ousted Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi, who clearly implicated Hillary in an interview she had with Turkey’s Anatolia news agency.

Hillary Clinton’s support of the Muslim Brotherhood, who were videoed admitting that the US was an enemy to be destroyed, is guilty of treason as defined in Article 3, Section 3 of the US Constitution.  Like Barack Obama, they both should be charged with the high crime of treason, tried, convicted and jailed for life.  However, with the help of powerful liberals like those behind the New York Times, instead of going to prison for her crimes, traitor Hillary just may end up replacing our current traitorous president, further plunging America in the darkest depths of despair our nation has ever known.