Political Activism OK for Mosques, Not Churches

Most churches have a non-profit status with the Internal Revenue Service.  One of the provisions of holding a 501c3 non-profit rating is that the church is not allowed to actively take part in political activities or publicly endorse a political candidate.

This has been an issue of contention and debate by many church leaders who contend that the political provision is a violation of the First Amendment rights of free speech and the freedom of religion.  However, in most cases, that have gone to court, the IRS generally wins and the church involved loses its non-profit status.

In reading through the various news reports, two stories caught my eye and caused me to wonder about this issue.

First is the legal battle being waged over a recall of the mayor and 2 city council members in El Paso, Texas.  For background on this case, see El Paso Mayor Fighting Pastor’s Right to Petition for Recall.

This past Friday, the Texas Eighth Court of Appeals declared that the main force behind the recall movement was a church and that churches do not have the right to recall, so the recall election has been halted.  According to Joel Oster, an attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund,

“The appeals court in Texas has stopped the recall election because one of the supporters of the recall election was supposedly a church, and according to the Texas appeals court, a church cannot be involved in a recall election.

“It absolutely is a violation of free speech and a violation of the right to petition your government for the redress of grievances.  The Supreme Court already spoke on this issue and said that even corporations have free speech rights and that states cannot restrict the speech of even corporate entities.”

Pastor Brown and the others involved are planning on appealing to the Texas Supreme Court.

In the second news article, Muslims have been standing outside their Michigan mosque handing out flyers in Arabic urging Muslims to support Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul in yesterday’s primary.  And do you think anyone took any action against the Muslims for violating their non-profit status?  Of course not!

Incidentally, did you know that in the 2008 election, Barack HUSSEIN Obama carried 80% of the Muslim votes?  With all of his anti-Christian, anti-Jew and pro-Muslim actions, I wouldn’t be surprised to see him carry over 90% of the Muslim vote in November.

These two news stories reveal a growing trend in America.  The Obama administration is actively stripping Christians and churches of their constitutional rights, while Muslims can openly defy the law, the IRS and the US Constitution and they will not lift one finger to stop them.  In fact, they appoint judges who are now ruling on Sharia law over state and federal law.

If Obama is re-elected in November, I’m sure it will usher in the United States of Islam.

75 thoughts on “Political Activism OK for Mosques, Not Churches

  1. Once again, the muslims are given a pass and permitted to do something that other religious groups are prevented from doing. More submission to sharia. and no surprise they would be promoting Ron Paul. IMO, we ought to vote for the person FEARED most by muslims and he doesn't seem to be that man. I have no doubt that all over America muslims are eating their falalfels with their fingers crossed, and prayers to allah, that Paul or Obama will be President after this coming election because either one will well-serve their purposes.

    BTW: I really have alot of respect for Paul..He's enormously likeable and is honest to a fault, regardless of who he is speaking to. I like that. I like his consistency and agree with a lot of his economic and constitutional positions, but… my problem with him is that he is a dove…..an appeaser…someone who EXCUSES the behavior of jihadists. This tells me that he knows little to nothing about Islam and what we are really facing with this enemy. And that makes him a poor choice for a Commander-in-Chief, especially in a time of war.

    1. This tells me that YOU know little or nothing about Ron Paul's foreign policy. Get your head out of the TV and start researching what he's actually said.

      He is more than willing to attack ANY country that is truly a threat to Americans, but with a legitimate act of war, not a military/industrial collaboration to fight wars without end. When war is declared, it has a goal established. That goal can be extended if the commanders in the field see that it needs to be. Not endless war that only burns up tax dollars and American military forces as the ultimate consumer. If he wasn't right on his position about this, do you think that G.I.'s would give him more funding than any other candidate.

      Stop mimicking some bobble-head on TV and act like you know what you're talking about.

      1. Fox…just sos ya know….I was against both wars. Even Afghanistan, where we were sure of the Al Quaeda connection. Since WW2, we've been engaged in nation building, spreading democracy and POLITICALLY WAGED WARS and I"ve been against it all. We can't be the world's policeman and you can't spread democracy like spreading mayo on bread. You can't make anyone want to be free..the desire for liberty has got to rise up in men and they have to be willing to fight for it. and the quest for liberty is alien in an Islamic culture.

        As for my approach to terrorism: I've been seriously studying Islam with arab ex-muslims since 1999 and based on what I"ve learned I would have targeted Mecca and Medina, Islam's holiest cities, and given Saudi Arabia ( best buddies with Bush and the sponsors of terrorism) an ultimatum…..STOP the terrorism right now or see your cities bombed into dust. I would have gone for their jugular right off the bat because fierce determination is all they respect. Islam is the enemy and Quran-obeying muslims have declared war on the entire world. Sorry, pacifism is not my style.

      2. As for Ron Paul….have you even listened to his remarks about the Middle East….about Islam? He seems to know nothing about it and thinks that we should just apply the Golden Rule, play nice and that will make them stop. He does NOT understand that their PLAN is to rule the world….that accusing the USA of criminal acts against them is just a rationalization and justification for their attacks on us. If we did NOTHING but twiddle our thumbs and whistle, they would still try to kill us ….for THAT is what allah has commanded them to do. Appeasement NEVER EVER works with a bully.

        Why the military has given to his campaign? Weariness of war? Frustration with the way the war is being run? I don't know.

    2. When did Doctor Ron Paul appease the Jihadists, that's an outright lie, making you no better than the Jihadists, who are allowed to lie to infidels with total impunity? He claims that if we don't occupy their streets with tanks and artillery, they have no valid reason to attack us. When you glance at the Occupy movement with disdain and irritation, remember that! Makes perfect sense to anyone sensible.

      1. tex….an appeaser is someone who continues to feed the crocodile with the hopes that he will be the last one eaten. Have you listened to Paul's rhetoric when he speaks about Islam? I think he is a decent, committed Christian, who truly believes that by treating people with respect and dignity, by behaving according to the Golden Rule, that they will change their attitude about you. In the eyes of Quran-obeying muslims, genuine and sincere gestures of friendliness and concern are perceived as the acts of an inferior person who is being submissive to them. While most human beings respond positively to a kind and respectful approach, jihadists do not.

        Muslims do not need a valid reason to attack us. Allah has commanded them to take over the world for him. That is a fact that Ron Paul doesn't seem to understand.

    3. they are given a pass because obama is a muslim, and he is forcing islam on us, tomorrow at 3pm eastern, Joe Arpaio will give the results of obamas eligibility….if as many suspect , that he is NOT Eligible to hold the office, the process for his removal should begin, and an investigation of those responsible for lying to Americans to install this maggot in office should be tried and Hung …..George Soros…..i hope you are reading this,…….time is running out,…..

  2. da Tagliare: I pray the last line of your post is absolutely 1000% wrong.
    Your analysis of the trends, however, seems to indicate overwise.
    God help us.

  3. I spent a year living in the middle east and I'm here to tell you the Quran is not just a guide for religion it dictates how you conduct your life and also rules for governmential rules like Sharia law. If a muslium follows the Quran totally then they should be deported because that means they are going to attempt to overthrow our country and institute Sharia law. If you do not convert to their so called religion then you are history per the Quran.

    1. Tom….that's absolutely correct. I've been trying to get that point across to people since 911. People who may have ''nice'' muslim neighbors just don't want to accept the idea that Islam is evil. So here we are…..11 years later and we have a government that is infiltrated by our enemy, and Americans were stupid enough to elect a muslim as president. What a preventible mess we are in.

    1. Yes. General Pershing used pig fat to coat the bullets his troops used in the late 1800's-early 1900's. They were fighting in the Phillipines against a muslim led insurrection. They also tied up the enemy dead in hog carcasses and buried them or hung them from trees. Study history.

    2. OH Yes, big time! To touch it makes them 'unclean' , so they can't go to heaven and get their 72 virgins! I've been trying to figure out a way to liquify bacon grease and put it in one of those little spray bottles that I could take on a plane! Spray them with that and see how fast they'd give up trying to kill themselves and everyone else!

  4. Of course it is fine for Moslims to engage in political activity from their mosques. After all, Islam is a CULT not a religion.

  5. There's a Youtube video of one of the radical Imams who proudly and rightfully states, "Islam is not a religion, it is a way of life". That about sums it up. Islam, the "religion" or racism, hatred, rape and murder. All in the name of Allah.

    1. Christianity is also a religion and a way of life. Unfortunately, or fortunately most Christians would be forgiving of a Muslim when they err. I do not believe a Muslim would return the ethic. So, what are we all going to do about this? My first question is simply—-why do the Muslims leave their country and come here knowing our laws and culture? It would seem the intent is to intimidate and change our way of life….time to take action!

  6. The Muslims are not out of line for their visible support on the street. The church itself cannot endorse or provide support to maintain a candidate from the pulpit. Outside the church, individuals can speak for anyone they want. However, the church itself cannot participate in the recall process, nor provide money to affect the outcome of the process, If they wish to maintain their 501-c(3) status. The church or mosque can fund a PAC, through the rules established through the Federal government, which many religious organizations do to solve this. And there are many minority churches who openly defy the limitations anyway. Any political figure can speak from the pulpit, but the church cannot endorse the person or anyone else running for office. The law is vague and a political football, and the Muslims are taking advantage of it.

    1. According to the latest FBI reports, almost ALL of the mosques of America are led by jihadist-teaching Imams which encourage war on America. Encouraging support for a particular party or candidate is the least of our worries. IMO All mosques ought to be razed and Islam eradicated from America. There should be ZERO tolerance for it. Because it is a hegemonic, misogynistic fascistic totalitarian belief system camoflagued in the dress and rhetoric of religion, bent on taking over our government, Islam has NO claim on the First Amendment.

    2. I think Guest was trying to present some logic; though I disagree with a couple of things. It is pretty darn obvious that black churches are "exempt" from the very same IRS rule that white churches are held to regarding politicking in church. It sounds like the case above is a ploy by the mayor just because the pastor is involved doesn't necessarily mean he is representing the church as an entity looking for the recall. But I would argue that if a corporation can institute a recall, then so can a church. Personally, I don't believe that a corporation should be allowed this either; since our government is supposed to be "of the people" – a person – a VOTER – must weigh in on a recall campaign. A business entity or some type can most certainly defeat most individuals when it comes to financial strength. I would also argue that while any political figure can speak from a pulpit – that should not be allowed in any church – but at the same time, it should be church policy – not the government's. I don't go to church for politics, I go to worship. If a church wants to host a politician – fine – but don't do that at a worship service for GOD.

  7. The Founders on what to do when the nation is in the situation it is in:

    “When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”
    It is not an easy thing and aught not be considered for transient causes, yet enough will inevitably be enough. At some point there is no point and we are at that point. When you read the names, remember that these were real people pushed not forced to change the course of human history for the globe entire. The last century has produced a cancer to liberty called “corporatocricy.” What this new “world view” has meant in reality is that the 20th century has been characterized by three developments of great political importance: the growth of democracy, the growth of corporate power, and the growth of corporate propaganda as a means of protecting corporate power against democracy. Which would not have been the case but for the reduction of republicanism and growth of popular-ism (i.e. the return to direct democracy)?
    When you read the names, remember that these were real people pushed not forced to change the course of human history for the globe entire.

    “And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.”
    New Hampshire:
    Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton
    John Hancock, Samuel Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry
    Rhode Island:
    Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery
    Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott
    New York:
    William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris
    New Jersey:
    Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark
    Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross
    Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean
    Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton
    George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton
    North Carolina:
    William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn
    South Carolina:
    Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton
    Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton
    The conscious natures of patriots have always known that the tree of liberty would need to be fed from time to time, will you matter next, or will you willingly place the shackles provided to you on for the illusion of peace?

    1. Any one who believes that the forces which are destroying our liberties can be stopped without violence is living with a myth. The battle today is between good and evil, truth and lies. Our very survival depends upon the willingness to take up arms in defense of liberties granted by God and anchored in His eternal Word.

  8. The Founders on role of Christianity:
    “Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure if we have removed their only firm basis – a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God, that they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just – that His justice cannot sleep forever.” (Thomas Jefferson)
    “We electors have an important constitutional power placed in our hands: we have a check upon two branches of the legislature…It becomes necessary to every citizen then, to be in some degree a statesman: and to examine and judge for himself…the political principals and measures. Let us examine them with a sober Christian spirit.” (John Adams)
    “Is it reasonable to commit the management of public revenue to one who hath wasted his own patrimony? Those, therefore, who pay no regard to religion and sobriety in the persons whom they send to the legislature of any State are guilty of the greatest absurdity and will soon pay dear for their folly.” (John Witherspoon)
    “It is alleged by men of loose principals, or defective views of the subject, that religion and morality are not necessary or important qualifications for public station.” (Noah Webster)
    A Contemporary Comments on Christian Constitutionalism:
    “Mormonism and Black Liberation Theology are cults of social relativism, neither follow clear Christian doctrine as understood by the founders in terms of faith and government, I think this played a part in both Romney and Obama’s willingness to ignore the individual rights of citizens by creating a government mandate to purchase a product that each of them designed to their personal satisfactions; what’s next?” (Reverend Franklin Graham)

  9. The Founders on Democracy:
    “A democracy is a volcano which conceals the fiery materials of its own destruction.” (Fisher Ames)
    “”A simple democracy is the devils own government.” (Benjamin Rush)
    “Remember, a democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.” (John Adams)
    If any one voter stops to think about the language used today by people like Obama and Romney and Santorum it is clear that to each of them “democracy” is preferable to a “republic,” and the reason is also clear, each of them likes to dictate and coerce through the force of State. Vote Paul or Newt, any other vote is a vote for more of the same medicine that has spent and borrowed us into oblivion. Newt lead the congress on paying down the national debt and balancing the budget, Paul has never voted for a debt increase or more spending.

    Science is a “method” not a body of truths or facts, to assert otherwise is to embrace a position based on controlled variables and no true scientist asserts that any group of variables can ever be fixed; variables are variables any claim to the contrary ensures that the claimant is at best dishonest and at worst a charlatan.
    The coming into being of the universe as discussed in “modern science” is not just a matter of imposing some sort of organization upon a previous incoherent state; but literally the coming into being of all physical things from nothing. This means that the series of past events could not have gone on forever and will not go on forever therefore the universe and everything in it had a beginning and thus will have an end. Infinity from infinity or infinity and infinity both equal irrationally thus inconclusively because the nature of the question can be found nowhere in nature itself. The evolutionist and scientific approaches to “origin” agree with the design or creation approaches on this matter. For the evolutionist this is called the Big Bang, for the theist this is called creation, semantics aside, this is simple truth. And, once the mind grasps that, it can then begin to grasp that the cause of this event must be beyond space and time and could not come from a physical or material thing that did not yet exist. This leaves “only” the possibility of an “abstract thing,” or a “personal mind,” for its cause. The problem with the “abstract thing” hypotheses becomes immediately obvious as “abstracts” on their own cannot “cause” anything. Letters and numbers are “abstractions.” These abstractions by themselves have no use, have no value, only when you have another reality such as “consciousness” in use simultaneously do these “abstractions” mean anything or even exist. Until “science” can explain the cause of transcendent matter from nothingness, the only delineable possibility is that the “design” hypothesis is still the only hypotheses to posit a comprehensive understanding which happens to be the understanding humans have had before the human constructs of religion, philosophy, and science, as avenues to seek answers to this very question.
    The implication of allowing the separating of these constructs (science-philosophy-religion) upon social collectives is staggeringly consequential. Hence the preamble to the constitution of the US, “that man is endowed by his creator,” as opposed to, “man is endowed by the state which he created;” man will always use force and will to meddle in the affairs of other men, only the recognition of an omnipotent conciseness being the provider of individual rights along with the true implementation of negative rights which limit the state’s rights not the individuals, has produced liberty in any meaningful sense for any prolonged period of time. For this country (USA) that all changed with the so called progressive relativistic evolutionary philosophy’s of Darwin, Niche, and Marx, which Santorum, Obama, and Romney have “already” demonstrated the willingness to embrace. Neither possesses fundamental understandings of liberty for individuals nor do they have histories that would suggest comprehension of “free-market” principals.

  11. Why don't the churches give up their non-profit status and start speking out against this muslim in the Oval Office. I have asked my church authoriities to take a vote of the congregation but they refused too. They are total pansies so I have to start at the grass roots. Maybe if we have to taxes then they won't have the money for their frivulous spending.

    1. I've found that unfortunately an awful lot of clergyman and women lean a bit to the left. they also have a tendency to subscribe to what will be the downfall of this nation, political correctness.

  12. could we just mail a pound of bacon to the UN delegates that are Muslims? Think if they recvd thousands of pounds of bacon. They may leave.

  13. Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Al Gore and Jesse Jackson have all openly campaigned in predominently black churches without the tax status of any of these churches being questioned. The real hypocrisy and double standard that exists is between conservative and Republican involvement in churches which is never allowable and liberal Democrat use of churches which always is.

  14. Democracies fail because majority rule is contaminated socially, intelectually,emotionally and when secularism robbs the democracy of faith in the Creator God, it becomes blind to reason. That is where America is today. God is irrevelant and deemed unnessary. Government has replaced him. The citizenry look for someone to lead them in a way that pleases them; therefore the leader they choose is one with promises that "tickle" their ears. How else would Obama be in our WH. He was not constitutionally qualified, but those responsible to require him to be qualified, failed to do so. He now controls our DOJ, our FBI, our Military and our Supreme court. He blames congress for every thing that goes wrong and, by what ever means nessary, will probably be elected to serve another term.

  15. I thought that when people who enter into the religious arena they take a vow of loyalty to God and the church. They gave up worldly goods/possessions when entering into this vow. That was clearly the modus operandi d'jour. I am seeing more and more clergy enter into a political arena which I think is incorrect, according to the vows they take. I know this is what "in olden days" the Catholic church used to instill, but todays standards do not reflect those vows i.e., moving guidlines and rules, man first, Not God! We have an overabundance of chaos and distention and racism to its highest level because there are no concrete rules being followed. Now, we have disstention because of allowing Muslim's exception to rules and enforcing same on non-mulsim clergy. Double Standards to say the least. Very dangerous.

    1. Jesus was very much involved with the political leaders of his day – they were the religious ruling class of the Jews: The Sanhedrin. Jesus of course, knew that ALL law has its foundation in the MORAL CODE (the Ten Commandments were both a political foundation as well as moral) and he confronted these hypocrites regularly. We DO NOT give up our rights or DUTIES upon entering God's work. Quite the contrary.

  16. Hello! Why do you think that it is written in Revelation, chapter 11 that our Savior must first destroy Islam once he returns? First, it means that our women(remember Eve?) really are in charge. However, it also means that Israel, save 144,000, 12,000 from each tribe of Israel, excluding Dan(Irish) will be killed by the two-witnesses of Revelation. No? Watch!~ Looks like September 16, 2012 on this years Annual Feast of Trumpets(War) may begin our LAST 3 1/2 years on earth for awhile, otherwise? Again, Watch!

  17. Double standards are only doubled for the Muslims, for everyone else you just can't do it!!!!! There are a significant number of elected officials including judges and appointed judges that need to be impeached or removed from office ASAP! The judges and the Reps and Senators, at State and Federal level, are not completing their Oath of Office. What a bunch of liars!?!?!?!

  18. If you could look back at least a couple years in the comments column, I have been saying that this illegal, muslim kenyan, who is anti-American should be IMPEACHED NOW because by this November's election, it may be too late. I pray that someone or somebody get the IMPEACHMENT process going before its too late, its a must in order to save America as we knew it. Even now, former ways of live are beginning to disappear! So let's go, get this muslim out of office along with some of his muslim appointments to his staff and those two recent appointments to the Supreme Court. They need to go as well. Also, there are numerous liberal Senators and Representatives that need to be defeated in the coming elections so that some sanity can come to those legislative bodies.

    1. To: Don

      As you may well know, the problem is not with the U.S. Congress; it is with the communist controlled U.S. Senate who refuse to honor Article I, Section 3. (6) of the United States Constitution and their Oath of Office. In my view, the foreign-born Muslim communist agent dictator Mr. Barack Hussein Obama II can only be charged as a "Saboteur." And the only first line of defense for America is the Armed Forces of the United States who have sworn to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic. This applies directly to Mr. Barack Hussein Obama II of Kenya, East Africa.

      USAF (RET)

  19. Keeping this simple I wish to say to hell with Islam. This is our country and if you all are smart you will start speaking up before this country becomes part of the middle east. Obama is taking over in this country so your job now is to make certain, no matter what it takes to get this slimebag out of the oval office. If this statement is not accepted by Godfather Politics then I will cancel my affiliation. I am not politically correct and I consider Barack Obama NOT my President. November is coming folks…Take America back. It's worth fighting for.

  20. People keep thinking that muslin is a religion. It is not! It is a political ploy to rule the world. You are not a muslin? Then is okay for them to kill you. Does that really sound like a religion? Come of people, we are at war. If we don't want to live like a muslin then we had better be willing to go to the streets and fight. Mr. Muslin, himself, Obama, is going to be laughing so hard at the citizens who sit at home and don't vote. He is really in a spot to be re-elected and things will go farther downhill from there

  21. Ovmit is a slim ball he needs to be in jail with the rest of his buddys he is not my presadent and never was I hope joe gets him kicked out of are country or put in jail for lieing and hurting this country

  22. All of Obamas Willing Victims seem to not care what happens to them or their country. Everyone needs to remember that every country the muslims have moved in; they have taken over; and none of them are fit to live in now. You may find that one day you will have no where to go. I and my family will not embrace Islam or its pedophile prophet. We will serve Lord as best we can for as long as we can. If that means fighting the muslims then so be it.

  23. Multiculturalism: what a perfect method to kill OUR language,
    OUR culture, OUR way of life and OUR country!

    Get RID of ALL non-Americans from OUR state and NEVER, EVER
    allow another non-American, sub-human POS SOB in OUR courts
    or OUR government agencies!! NO benefits and NO services!!

  24. You can't passify the school yard bully. Apologies and the giving of gifts have never worked, why do we keep trying. Ron Paul is right get out of Persia and develop our own oil and stop sending them our money. Muslim immigrants who do not wish to get away from their oppresive culture but want to bring it over here are not welcome. How far is it going to go before the wall is hit?

  25. When, oh when will the people of the US wake up and defend themselves from this backward, fanatical religious culture which is slowly imposing itself on this country through the cowardice and silence of its rightful citizens???
    I am an immigrant and a naturalized citizen, but I would gladly stand up and fight along with you for this country which has so generously adopted me, against the vermin of islam who have no right to bring their 7th C, cave-dwelling, mysogynist, warring and enslaving inferior culture to this land I can hardly recognize since I was brought over my my parents.
    The behavior and abuse of these troglodytes is exactly why the Crusades were called in the 11th C. — Will it take another call for a Crusade from the Catholic Church to save this coutnry from being overrun by the backward muslim immigrants whose aim is to take it over?

  26. Fundamentalist Islam is NOT a Religion. It is an economic, legal, societal, political and military movement that claims to worship a God, but does not allow one to have free will. It is not a Religion. It is a force of man, inspired by evil.

  27. ***************"If Obama is re-elected in November, I’m sure it will usher in the United States of Islam".***************
    Ugh!!! That's a situation that would trigger a radical reduction in the Muslim Population that has sprung up like Toxic Mushrooms.

  28. Are there no laws in our Constitution that can put this pretender-in-chief up for impeachment? All Clinton did was to unzip his pants and he got impeachment. This president is ruining our whole country and nothing is being done about it. Where is our Congress at? I know, with one thumb in their mouth and the other up their…

    1. There are very many things that would legally warrant impeachment.  There are two problems with that.  We saw both with the Clinton impeachment.  

      1.  No matter what supporting evidence is involved, the Democrats and media will proclaim the House of Representatives are using a vast, right-wing, partisan assault in voting to impeach.  He could be proven to have broken one out of every three federal laws and there would still be political support behind him accusing Republicans of acting out of racial hatred and political malice.  Of course, Republicans actually had the courage to act with Clinton.  Today, their are either too pragmatic (see item 2) or just plain cowards.

      2.  The Senate is the jury for an impeachment trial.  Just as we had Democrat Senators getting up on our TV screens during the Clinton impeachment saying that they had no doubt that he was fully guilty of the crimes for which he was being accused, but didn’t think that his guilt should be a basis for removing him from office.  With a Democrat-majority senate, we could prove that he tortures puppies and kittens on the White House front lawn, daily, on TV, while cheating on his taxes and forging passports for terrorists to enter this country (just an example, I do not believe that he tortures cute, furry animals OR forges terrorist passports) and not get a conviction.  The fact that no amount of guilt on his part will result in his removal from office by the Senate, it contributes to the House not taking action against him for the illegal things he has, or may have, done.  

      3.  For what we all know or think we know, and for all that we have evidence to support those beliefs, AG Eric Holder will NEVER appoint an independent council to investigate anything Obama-related (unless it is Obama-opponents), even if Congress orders it.  Just as he would not pursue a case against the Black Panthers, a case the US government had ALREADY WON IN COURT, he will never take any actions against Obama or any of those Obama favors.

  29. I just through a copy of the koran in the trash. So, if all you mooselums don't like that then stop burning our Bible. Get a grip and learn how to act like HUMANS!

  30. This story misses the point: WHY are the Muslims supportying Ron Paul? Is it because they believe he would not intervene if Israel were attacked? There is something very sinister here.

  31. There are no religious leaders involved in politics: Jessie Jackson, Al Sharpton (did I say that, guess I'd better move before lightening strikes me ). lol

  32. And who was it that sided with the IRS? A judge? If the church had argued in front of a JURY…the IRS would have lost…every time. Too many judges are paid off to render a proper decision. Makes me glad I'm not a judge…or a lawyer.

  33. They want to make Christians so ostracized that the general populace no longer cares when the Christians are taken away and put in concentration camps.

  34. We are going the way of Great Britian and France where the Muslims can do what they want. This snake will eventually reach up and bite us if we do not turn this trend around sooner than later!

  35. Jesus said pay Caesar what is Caesars. Churches handcuff their own hands by wanting tax free status and keeps them from speaking truth about many things lest the almighty dollar get taxed. If a church will preach the truth, pay Caesar what belongs to DC then the government has no power over them. Instead they bow to the almighty dollar instead of Jesus.

  36. As I have said, you people have slept and these people have and now rule your country! Go back to sleep!!!!

  37. Like the prayer in schools , you cowards lost it to a few! You deserve to lose it! You’re tooooo stupid to hold onto it!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *