What’s Next After Legalized Same-Sex Marriage?


Now that the door has been opened to violate the traditional union of marriage, we need to ask where will the line be drawn, or can it be drawn?

A friend of mine sent me the following email which brings that question to mind:

Good morning. We want to apply for a marriage license.”

“Names?”, said the clerk.

“Tim and Jim Jones.”

“Jones?? Are you related?? I see a resemblance.”

“Yes, we’re brothers.”

“Brothers?? You can’t get married.”

“Why not?? Aren’t you giving marriage licenses to same gender couples?”

“Yes, thousands. But we haven’t had any siblings. That’s incest!”

“Incest?” No, we are not gay.”

“Not gay?? Then why do you want to get married?”

“For the financial benefits, of course. And we do love each other. Besides, we don’t have any other prospects.”

“But we’re issuing marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples who’ve claim they’d been denied equal protection under law.
If you are not gay, you can get married to a woman.”

“Wait a minute. A gay man has the same right to marry a woman as I have.
But just because I’m straight doesn’t mean I want to marry a woman. I want to marry Jim.”

“And I want to marry Tim, Are you going to discriminate against us just because we are not gay?”

“All right, all right. I’ll give you your license. Next.”

“Hi. We are here to get married.”

“Names?”

“John Smith, Jane James, Robert Green, and June Johnson.”

“Who wants to marry whom?”

“We all want to marry each other.”

“But there are four of you!”

“That’s right. You see, we’re all bisexual. I love Jane and Robert, Jane loves me and June, June loves Robert and Jane, and Robert loves June and me. All of us getting married together is the only way that we can express our sexual preferences in a marital relationship.”

“But we’ve only been granting licenses to gay and lesbian couples.”

“So you’re discriminating against bisexuals!”

“No, it’s just that, well, the traditional idea of marriage is that it’s just for couples.”

“Since when are you standing on tradition?”

“Well, I mean, you have to draw the line somewhere.”

“Who says?? There’s no logical reason to limit marriage to couples. The more the better. Besides, we demand our rights! The mayor says the constitution guarantees equal protection under the law. Give us a marriage license!”

“All right, all right. Next.”

“Hello, I’d like a marriage license.”

“In what names?”

“David Anderson.”

“And the other man?”

“That’s all. I want to marry myself.”

“Marry yourself?? What do you mean?”

“Well, my psychiatrist says I have a dual personality, so I want to marry the two together.
Maybe I can file a joint income-tax return.”

“That does it!? I quit!!? You people are making a mockery of marriage!!”

…Don’t laugh, it’s just a matter of time.

 No, it’s not funny! It is only a matter of time before this will really happen in the not too distant future. You can also add to the list a man and young girl or a woman and young boy. Let’s not forget a man and his sheep or dog.

It may sound repulsive, but these are all the logical consequences of the Supreme Court decision to legalize same-sex marriage. Once marriage has been redefined to fit one perverse group of people, other perverse groups will demand their re-definition of marriage to fit their abominable lifestyle as well.

The above email is a realistic portrayal of where America is heading, thanks to the US Supreme Court and the do-nothing silence of millions of Christians.

 

Previous Court Throws Out Sheriff Arpaio’s Lawsuit Against Obama’s Delayed Deportation
Next Congress Calls Out Planned Parenthood

Comment