A New French Revolution: No Mothers or Fathers

The French Revolution was a bloody mess. Blood literally flowed in the streets. The god of reason was substituted for the only true God. When this happened, irrationalism served as a cruel and vindictive master.

There’s a new revolution on the march in France. And while it might not be blood, its long-term consequences could be even more devastating the sharp blade of the guillotine. “France is set to ban the words ‘mother’ and ‘father’ from all official documents under controversial plans to legalize gay marriage.”

Couples will only be recognized as “parents” in marriage ceremonies for all heterosexual and same-sex couples. “The draft law states that ‘marriage is a union of two people, of different or the same gender.’”

“It says all references to ‘mothers and fathers’ in the civil code – which enshrines French law – will be swapped for simply ‘parents.’

“The law would also give equal adoption rights to homosexual and heterosexual couples.

“Justice Minister Christiane Taubira told France’s Catholic newspaper La Croix: ‘Who is to say that a heterosexual couple will bring a child up better than a homosexual couple, that they will guarantee the best conditions for the child’s development?’”

Trending: Report: Search Site DuckDuckGo Hands User Data Over to Google

Yes, who is to say? That’s the question of the ages.

take our poll - story continues below

Has There Been Voter Fraud in the 2020 Election?(2)

  • Has There Been Voter Fraud in the 2020 Election?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Godfather Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Where does the redefinition of marriage or anything else stop if we adopt the premise of “who is to say”? In the case of the French, it’s the French government that will say what constitutes a marriage. Once a government assumes the authority to redefine a God-ordained institution, there won’t be anything it can’t redefine.

In the Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), the Supreme Court ruled that people of African descent brought into the United States and held as slaves (or their descendants, whether or not they were slaves) were not protected by the Constitution and were not U.S. citizens. Adolf Hitler redefined Jewish personhood and planned for their extermination. In 1973, the Supreme Court, in a 7–2 decision, ruled that pre-born babies were non-persons that could be killed by their mothers.

It was during the French Revolution that religion was redefined and reason was elevated to divine status. We all know how that turned out.

Don't forget to Like Godfather Politics on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at RepublicanLegion.com.

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Godfather Politics email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Previous How Ignorant are Obama Supporters?
Next A Lesson about Obama from a Cuban Immigrant

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon to the right of the comment, and report it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation. If you don't see a commenting section below, please disable your adblocker.