After Two Years of Media Focus on Russia, Suddenly Pulitzer Prizes Have NO Russia At All


Until this year, the Pulitzer Prize Committee focused heavily on celebrating “journalism” that explored the fraudulent tale of Donald Trump “colluding” with Russia. But now that the Russia story has gone bust, the Pulitzers are suddenly empty of any stories about Russia.

For instance, last year the New York Times and the Washington Post won nods for “deeply sourced, relentlessly reported coverage in the public interest that dramatically furthered the nation’s understanding of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and its connections to the Trump campaign.”

Of course, in fact, all that “reporting” was utter bunk. The “sources” were liars and there was no “collusion” nor was there any real influence by Russia on the 2016 elections.

Trending: After Washington D.C. Moves Homeless Into Upscale Apartments, The Place Turns Into Ghetto

These Pulitzers are all garbage.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Joe Biden drop out of the Presidential race because of his inappropriate touching of women?

  • Should Joe Biden drop out of the Presidential race because of his inappropriate touching of women?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Godfather Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

But, for the last two years the Pulitzers have all been all about Russia, Russia, Russia.

Then came the Mueller report that found no collusion, no Russia, and no influence. And, just like that… *poof*…. the Russia story is off the list for the Pulitzers.

As Monica Showalter at American Thinker noted:

This year? Nothing. Zero, zip, nada. Poof! I checked, even among the non-winning nominees, which took some work. There was a single entrant from among the cartoonists who had a few ignorant Trump-colluded-with-the-Russians tropes, and that guy didn’t win.

As Showalter noted, “it adds up to a rather dramatic change in focus because up until now, Russia-Russia-Russia coverage has been big business for Pulitzers.”

She is exactly right.

How can the Pulitzers go from all Russia all the time to not one peep about the story only weeks after the Mueller report emerges?

But it gets worse. Not only did the stories about Trump collusion suddenly disappear from the Pulitzer list, but all the stories that revealed the lies of the Russia story were also ignored by the Pulitzer committee.

So, on one hand, the Pulitzers spent two years celebrating stories pushing the collusion lies, but when that story was actually proven a lie by the very man they expected to prove otherwise, the committee then ignored the stories proving it was a lie.

But… yeah… the Pulitzer Prize is about “journalism,” not pushing the liberal agenda.

Right?

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.

You Might Like
Previous Good Guy With A Gun: Texas Man Takes Out 5 Home Invaders with His AK-47
Next Ilhan Omar Tweeted In 2017: U.S. Was ‘Founded By Genocide’

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.