Sunday’s border incident with the Migrant Caravan has motivated some on the liberal side of the aisle to compare the plight of the Central American migrants to the Jews fleeing the Holocaust. As we explained in a previous post that is a comparison of apples on oranges. The Jews were fleeing for their lives, the Central Americans are looking for jobs. Additionally, unlike the members of the caravan, the Holocaust refugees never stormed the border in an attempt to break into the country or threw rocks at border agents. There’s one more significant difference, the President during the Holocaust FDR, was possibly the most bigoted president in American history. And despite what you may be hearing from the liberal media, Donald Trump, the president today is not a bigot.
Typically, when one asks a Democrat about Franklin Delano Roosevelt they immediately develop a sense of awe and genuflect as if he came down from heaven to lead the United States. It’s hard to understand the reverence for FDR, his economic programs failed, he was a bigot who put Americans of Japanese descent into camps, and he was an anti-Semite who doomed at least 200,000 Jews to die at the hands of Hitler’s “Final Solution.”
While other modern presidents may have been bigoted, none acted on their bigotry as much as FDR (Woodrow Wilson and Barack Obama fight second place). Liberals will claim that FDR had many Jews in his cabinet which is true, but it doesn’t mitigate his bigoted actions.
Roosevelt gets points for picking great Generals and led this country to victory in WWII. But he made the great depression longer, in 1937 his economic programs led unemployment to spike again reaching 19% (the previous high was 25%), his freedom-sapping policies never did get this country out of the Great Depression, and he tried to circumvent constitutional by packing the supreme court.
Then there’s the issue rarely discussed, he was a bigot and not only to Japanese citizens of the US. FDR’s hatred of Jews caused hundreds of thousands to be added to the ranks of Hitler’s victims. Earlier this year, the Holocaust Museum released documents revealing “Project M, ” which Roosevelt’s plan to thinly spread remains of European Jewry throughout the world. In FDR’s bigoted opinion, if Jews were spread across the world in small numbers they couldn’t do damage or incite hatred.
It wasn’t that Roosevelt didn’t know the best place to settle the Jewish refugees, he just didn’t want them in the United States. And he wanted his idea for dispersing Jews, “Project M” to remain secret:
FDR found time on the afternoon of July 30, 1942, in the midst of a schedule packed with meetings with Soviet Ambassador Maxim Litvinov, Secretary of State Cordell Hull, and General ‘Hap’ Arnold, to dictate a memo greenlighting the M Project. The memo, delivered by White House courier to Carter in his office in the National Press Building, a few blocks from the White House, stated: “I know that you and Henry Field can carry out this project unofficially, exploratorially, ethnologically, racially, admixturally, miscegenationally, confidentially and, above all, budgetarily.” It concluded: “Any person connected herewith whose name appears in the public print will suffer guillotinally.” Roosevelt repeatedly admonished Carter to keep the M Project completely secret.
In the book “FDR and the Holocaust: A Breach of Faith,” historian Rafael Medoff suggests that Roosevelt failed to take relatively simple measures that would have saved significant numbers of Jews during the Holocaust because his vision for America was one that had a small number of Jews. In other words, FDR doomed many Jew to suffer not because he wanted them to die, but because he didn’t want a lot of them living in his neighborhood.
In a piece for the Brandies Center, Medoff shared some of the hateful/public anti-Semitic statements Roosevelt made when he let his guard down:
In 1923, as a member of the Harvard board of directors, Roosevelt decided there were too many Jewish students at the college and helped institute a quota to limit the number admitted. In 1941, he remarked at a Cabinet meeting that there were too many Jews among federal employees in Oregon.
In 1938, he privately suggested that Jews in Poland were dominating the economy and were, therefore, to blame for provoking anti-Semitism there. In 1941, he remarked at a Cabinet meeting that there were too many Jews among federal employees in Oregon. In 1943, he told government officials in Allied-liberated North Africa that the number of local Jews in various professions “should be definitely limited” so as to “eliminate the specific and understandable complaints which the Germans bore towards the Jews in Germany.”
The most detailed of FDR’s statements about Jews was made during his meeting on January 17, 1943, in Casablanca, with leaders of the new local regime in Allied-liberated North Africa. U.S. ambassador Robert Murphy remarked that the 330,000 Jews in North Africa were “very much disappointed that ‘the war for liberation’ had not immediately resulted in their being given their complete freedom.”
(Before the war, when the Jews lived under the colonial French regime, they enjoyed rights similar to French citizens. But when the pro-Nazi Vichy French took over the French colonies in 1940, they stripped Jews of those rights. In 1943, upon the defeat of the Vichyites, the Jews had expected their rights would be restored.)
According to the official record of the conversation (later published by the U.S. government in its ‘Foreign Relations of the United States’ series), the president replied that “the number of Jews engaged in the practice of the professions (law, medicine, etc) should be definitely limited to the percentage that the Jewish population in North Africa bears to the whole of the North African population,” which “would not permit them to overcrowd the professions.”FDR explained that his plan “would further eliminate the specific and understandable complaints which the Germans bore towards the Jews in Germany, namely, that while they represented a small part of the population, over fifty percent of the lawyers, doctors, school teachers, college professors, etc, in Germany, were Jews.” (It is not clear where FDR obtained those wildly inflated statistics.)
Eugenics specifically as applied to Jews seems to be FDR’s motivation for “Project M.” He asked John Franklin Carter, who ran an informal secret intelligence service for the POTUS to help him set up the project:
Roosevelt’s first choice to head the M Project was Aleš Hrdlička, curator of physical anthropology at the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History. The two men had carried on a lively correspondence for over a decade and the President had absorbed the scientist’s theories about racial mixtures and eugenics. Roosevelt, the scion of two families that considered themselves American aristocrats, was especially attracted to Hrdlička’s notions of human racial “stock.”
But Hrdlička wouldn’t take the job because he wasn’t given full control of the project:
Isaiah Bowman, president of Johns Hopkins University and a geographer, was promoted from his role as a member of the committee to the head of the project. Roosevelt knew Bowman well and so was presumably aware of his anti-Semitic views:
In 1939, Bowman fired Jewish faculty member Eric Goldman because he claimed, “There are already too many Jews at Hopkins.” Goldman had received a unanimous departmental vote for reappointment to his position as a professor of history. Bowman also speculated that “Jews don’t come to Hopkins to make the world better or anything like that. They came for two things: to make money and to marry non-Jewish women.”
In 1942, Bowman instituted a quota on the number of Jewish students admitted to the University and restricted the number of Jewish students allowed to pursue degrees in the fields of science and math. The quota was abolished in the 1950s. In addition to his anti-Semitic beliefs, Bowman also expressed anti-black and homophobic sentiments
Bowman knew exactly what Roosevelt wanted out of Project M. Four years earlier, in 1938 he did a research project for the President, examining the prospects for European settlement in South America. In setting up the 1938 project FDR wrote Bowman:
“Frankly, what I am rather looking for is the possibility of uninhabited or sparsely inhabited good agricultural lands to which Jewish colonies might be sent.” Roosevelt added that “such colonies need not be large but, in all probability, should be large enough for mutual cooperation and assistance—say fifty to one hundred thousand people in a given area.”
The goal of project M was very similar
Describing the M Project to UK Prime Minister Winston Churchill in 1943, Roosevelt said the study is focused on “the problem of working out the best way to settle the Jewish question,” adding that the solution “essentially is to spread the Jews thin all over the world,” rather than allow them amass in large numbers in one specific place. The conversation was recorded in the diary of Vice President Henry Wallace, who was present at the meeting.
Very few people outside the team that produced the reports were allowed to see them and they had no discernible impact on policy decisions. In retrospect, the M Project’s principal accomplishment was to shed light on how now-discredited eugenic theories influenced FDR’s thinking about race, immigration, and the Jews of Europe. As the M Project’s reports rolled into the White House, so did news about the methodical starvation, torture, and extermination of Europe’s Jews in the Nazi Holocaust.
Project M is was just one example of FDR’s distaste for Jews. There were many actions FDR could have taken to stop or slow down the Holocaust, he didn’t. “He could have quietly permitted the immigration quotas to be filled to their legal limit — that alone would have saved 190,000 lives,” historian Rafael Medoff postulated. Additionally
“He could have pressed the British to open Palestine’s doors to Jewish refugees. He could have authorized the use of empty troop-supply ships to bring refugees to stay in the U.S. temporarily, until the end of the war. He could have permitted refugees to stay as tourists in a U.S. territory, such as the Virgin Islands, until it was safe for them to return to Europe. He could have authorized the bombing of Auschwitz or the railway lines leading to it, which would have interrupted the mass-murder process.”
Asked to respond to the argument that it was better for Roosevelt to focus on winning the war than divert resources to bomb Auschwitz, Medoff said “[b]ombing Auschwitz would not have required any diversion of resources, because U.S. planes were already bombing targets that were less than five miles from the gas chambers, during the summer and autumn of 1944.”
Additionally, FDR was reluctant to speak out against the impending genocide
On August 25  , First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt brought her friend Alice Hamilton, who had recently spent three months in Germany, to Hyde Park to give FDR a detailed eyewitness account of German brutality against the Jews. He still refused to publicly criticize Hitler.
It is sad to consider that Franklin Delano Roosevelt is considered a hero by most Americans when the real truth was that he was a bigot who caused the death of almost 200,000 Jews and threw AMERICANS of Japanese descent into camps. Perhaps it’s a progressive tradition as Woodrow Wilson and Barack Obama were also bigoted presidents.
Unlike FDR, President Trump is willing to process the asylum applications of any Central American migrant who meet the legal requirements and present their asylum request at a U.S. embassy in their home country or one of the official borders crossings.
Comparing the Holocaust to the Central American caravan is simply ignorant.
pFacebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at RepublicanLegion.com.