CBO: Pro-Life Bill Could Increase The Deficit By $400 Million

As if any politician really cares about the deficit. But expect pro-abortion politicians to use this CBO report to disparage Republicans who signed on to H.R. 1797, the bill that would ban abortions after 20 weeks. All of a sudden, they’ll claim that Republicans want to add to the national debt just so they can “control” women’s bodies. I’m sure they’d throw in how “irresponsible” and “unpatriotic” these Republicans are to do such a thing.

Here’s how the CBO came to its conclusion:

 “Depending on the number of additional births under H.R. 1797, such Medicaid costs could range from about $75 million over the next 10 years to more than $400 million over that period… [A]bout three-quarters of the abortions that would occur 20 weeks or more after fertilization under current law would instead occur earlier, and the remaining one-quarter would not occur so those pregnancies would be taken to term. Because the costs of about 40 percent of all births are paid for by the Medicaid program, CBO estimates that federal spending for Medicaid will rise to the extent that enacting H.R. 1797 results in additional births and deliveries relative to current law. In addition, some of those children would themselves qualify for Medicaid and possibly for other federal programs as well.”

I don’t necessarily doubt the CBO report. On the off chance that the bill was actually signed into law, I’m sure there would be some noticeable uptick in federal expenditures associated with childbirth and child healthcare over the course of a decade, however miniscule.

take our poll - story continues below

Will the Democrats try to impeach President Trump now that they control the House?

  • Will the Democrats try to impeach President Trump now that they control the House?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Godfather Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: ‘Houston Chronicle’ Forced to Retract Stories After Reporter’s Work Proven a Fraud

It would only affect the deficit, because we live in a welfare state. Our country has largely bought into the idea that the government needs to take care of us from cradle to grave. More than 58 million people rely on Medicaid, and many more will sign up once Obamacare takes full effect next year.

Once all these people are signed up under government “healthcare,” all they will be to the government is just a bunch of numbers. Once you become too costly to care for, they’ll have to “let you go,” in a compassionate sort of way. You wouldn’t want to be a burden on the system, would you? You wouldn’t want to contribute to the national debt or be part of the reason that our deficit is so large, would you? You see, once you become an Obamacare beneficiary, they own you. And they’ll have to operate in such a way to keep costs down.

If this pro-life bill did have this effect on the deficit, it wouldn’t be a good thing. But, then again, government healthcare was never a good thing. And speaking of government healthcare and the national debt, Medicare, Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) takes up about 23% of the federal budget. That’s around $802 billion. So, it doesn’t sound like they really care that much about the deficit and national debt after all. Only when it suits them politically.

Previous Watching the EPA Coup In Progress: New Report
Next Obama to Spend $7 Billion to Light Up African Homes


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.