CNN Legal Analyst Agrees with Trump in Shock Admission

Will wonders never cease?

I was watching CNN when I heard the most amazing thing… a CNN legal analyst agreeing with President Trump!

CNN Legal Analyst Paul Callan was a guest on CNN when he was asked about Senator Chuck Grassley’s decision to push the FBI and the DoJ on claims that some of their senior leadership may be too biased to do their jobs properly.

take our poll - story continues below

Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?

  • Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Godfather Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Trump Approval Rating Soars Past Obama’s Dampening on Democrat ‘Blue Wave’

The claims have angered liberals who say that the FBI (and the DoJ) are above reproach and should never be questioned, but the reality is that most Americans see the problem when half of the Russia investigative team have donated thousands of dollars to Democrats, and team leaders have been caught mocking the President and calling him a threat to our democracy.

Listen as Callan explains why the President, and Senator Grassley, are right to be concerned about the FBI’s motivations.

I started writing this piece about the whole situation that was raised by Grassley, and originally I was angered by President Trump’s attacks on the FBI, I thought they were unjustified, but when I started to delve into the facts, boy there is some really disturbing stuff here. 

What Grassley is talking about is this agent [Peter Strzok] who is a counterintelligence agent for the FBI. He is exchanging texts with his girlfriend Lisa Page which just trash the president…

They essentially, the two of them –the lawyer and the agent– agree that the president is a threat, or would be a threat to the country if elected. Now he’s in a central role in the Hillary email investigation, and as a matter of fact, Strzok was the person who went to James Comey right before Comey had that famous press conference where he kind of let Hillary off the hook and said the investigation was going to be dropped into criminal charges. Strzok was the guy who changed the language, which originally was that she was ‘grossly negligent’ in her handling of classified material, and he softened it to say ‘extremely careless,’ which is not criminal.

This is the same guy who the inspector general now has exchanging these emails showing that he has a personal bias against the president, so that is what Sen. Grassley wants a closer look at, and I think it is legitimate to look at the bias of the investigators. 

Previous Who’s Pulling the Strings on our North Korea Policy – Trump or Tillerson?
Next On Abortion: 'My Body, My Choice' is One Gigantic LIE


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.