Democrat Eric Swalwell Cries the Word ‘Woman’ Not in U.S. Constitution, Gets Slammed for ONE Little Problem

Democrat Eric Swalwell Cries the Word ‘Woman’ Not in U.S. Constitution, Gets Slammed for ONE Little Problem

Eric Swalwell has little integrity and now we also know he cannot read after he was seen pandering to women with the factoid that the word “woman” is not in the U.S. Constitution. But it was not long before people with more smarts than he found one little problem with his blather.

Swalwell is known for a major lack of intelligence, but like most Democrats he is an expert at pandering to grievance groups. And on Tuesday he showed us once again just how good he is at belching out nonsense to appeal to a particular grievance group.

Trending: Report: Search Site DuckDuckGo Hands User Data Over to Google

The nearly unknown Democrat candidate for president jumped onto his Twitter account to pander to women with a little factoid about the U.S. Constitution.

take our poll - story continues below

Will You Be Voting In Person November 3rd?(10)

  • Will You Be Voting In Person November 3rd?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Godfather Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“Do you know how many times the word ‘Woman’ is mentioned in the Constitution? Zero,” Swalwell declared.

“That is unacceptable,” he continued. “Women must be equally represented and equally protected,” Swalwell wrote, adding a hashtag in support of the long-dead Equal Rights Amendment.

Wow. It never mentions “woman.” Golly gee.

First of all, we must remember that from the birth of the English language all the way until about five years ago with braindead PCism took a grip on the throat of academia, the word “woman” was never used as a general or collective term.

The word for people in general was always said in the masculine vein. It was “man” or “mankind.” The term meant all of humanity, not just the male gender. It wasn’t used to denote gender, but to denote all of us collectively.

But, that aside, Swalwell was made to look even dumber when people began to alert him to another little factoid.

Swalwell is right that the word “woman” isn’t in the U.S. Constitution.

But… um… neither is the word “man,” you dolt.

Twitter users went wild slamming this half-witted Democrat for his failed attempt to pander to women.

Swalwell, sir, you are too stupid to be in government. You should resign.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.

Don't forget to Like Godfather Politics on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Godfather Politics email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

You Might Like
Previous Jews and Christians Must Stop Murders in Their Places of Worship by Taking Up Arms
Next Covington Catholic Student Nick Sandmann Now Suing NBC for $275 Million

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon to the right of the comment, and report it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation. If you don't see a commenting section below, please disable your adblocker.