European Court Stands Firm: Upholds Belgium’s Burqas Ban

Europe is finally taking a stand with a decision to protect themselves from radical Muslims, and it’s about time!

Belgium has a pretty firm ban on full-face Islamic veils, such as burqas. Now that ban has been upheld by none other than the European Court of Human Rights.

According to the judges, the nationwide prohibition of the facial cloth, which went into effect in 2011, does not violate the right to freedom of religion, private/Family life, or discrimination law. Instead, the court found Belgium was within their rights to impose these restrictions in order for the “protection of the rights and freedoms of others”.

take our poll - story continues below

Will the Democrats try to impeach President Trump now that they control the House?

  • Will the Democrats try to impeach President Trump now that they control the House?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Godfather Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Washington State Police Chief Says He Will REFUSE TO Enforce State’s Strict New Anti-Gun Law

Independent UK reports:

Its ruling said the government had been responding “to a practice that it considered to be incompatible, in Belgian society, with social communication and more generally the establishment of human relations, which were indispensable for life in society…essential to ensure the functioning of a democratic society”.

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) dismissed two separate cases – one appealing Belgium’s nationwide ban and another on a 2008 by-law adopted by three municipalities.

The first case was brought by two women – Samia Belcacemi and Yamina Oussar – who previously attempted to have the law suspended and annulled at the Constitutional Court in Brussels.

They both gave evidence on how the ban has affected their lives as Muslim women who choose to wear the niqab, which covers the face except for the eyes.

Ms Belcacemi said she initially continued to wear the veil in public but removed it over fear of being jailed or fined, while Ms Oussar said the law has forced her to stay at home.

The second case was brought by another Belgian woman, Fouzia Dakir, over a prohibition on full-face veils implemented in Pepinster, Dison and Verviers three years before the nationwide law.

She argued that the move infringed her right to wear the niqab guaranteed under the European Convention on Human Rights, with no “legitimate aim”.

The court found there had been no violation of her right to private life, freedom of religion or discrimination laws, but that Belgium had infringed her right of access to a court when the Conseil d’État ruled an initial application to annul the ban inadmissible.

In a unanimous judgement, judges ordered the Belgian government to pay the Ms Dakir €800 (£700) in costs.

Previous The Blaze Host Lawrence Jones Says, 'Black Folks Have Never Wanted a Handout'
Next Donald Trump Defends Junior: 'That's Politics'


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.