Forensic Analyst Says Obama Confessed His Foreign Birth and Ineligibility to be President

Have you ever been accused of ‘reading between the lines’ of what someone said or wrote?  Dr. Andrew G. Hodges has solved a number of crimes doing just that, reading between the lines.  As a clinical professor of psychiatry at the UAB School of Medicine, he has been used by the FBI to help solve a number of high profile crimes.  His involvement includes:

  • O.J. Simpson ‘suicide note’ which confirmed that he did commit a double a murder.
  • JonBenet ransom note which led to the identity of her killer.
  • BTK serial killer’s letters which led him to predict another murder when no one else did.
  • Natalee Holloway murder where he analyzed the statements made by Joran van der Sloot and Deepak Kalpoe, which tied them both the crime.
  • Casey Anthony’s letters written from jail that confirms that she murdered her daughter.
  • Bill Clinton – Monika Lewinsky confession and apology.

Hodges has developed a technique known as Thoughtprint Decoding, which is a form of psycholinguistic profiling.  His technique has proven to be a cutting edge profiling tool that has helped to identify and capture various criminals.  Dr. Steven Egger, associate professor of criminology at the University of Houston, Clear Water recognizes the value of what Hodges is doing and said:

“[Hodges’ technique is] becoming the cutting edge of forensic science…Dr. Hodges’ investigation of forensic documents in the Natalee Holloway case indicates that his ‘thoughtprint decoding method’ and ‘reading between the lines’ is, in fact, becoming a major contribution to law enforcement tools used by criminal investigators.”

take our poll - story continues below

Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?

  • Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Godfather Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: U.S. Finally Regains Top Spot as Most Competitive Economy For First Time Since 2008

Knowing Dr. Hodges reputation, WND requested that he use his forensic profiling to examine the address that President Barack Obama made to the United Nations on September 25, 2012.  In his analyses, Hodges asserts that Obama regularly alluded to his foreign birth, illegal presidency which is an attack on the U.S. Constitution.

Hodges concludes that the truths revealed in Obama’s U.N. address match up to the ones he made in his inaugural address in 2009:

“Deep down a guilty person cannot stop looking at his misdeed, his crime. Obama’s brilliant unconscious constantly comprehends his guilt and is incessantly moved to confess. Remember, the deeper mind speaks symbolically in a narrative language using key images. It is much like reading a parable.”

“The first thing Obama does in his U.N. address is make reference to his foreign birth – exactly as he did in his 2009 Inauguration Day speech when his opening sentence introduced the word ‘borne’ and thus the question, ‘Where was I born?’”

“At the U.N., Obama begins to tell ‘about an American named … who was born in a town called … He came to love … the people of Africa … and he would carry that commitment throughout his life.”

“His super intelligence, his deeper unconscious is actually saying, ‘I’m going to tell you the secret story of my supposed American birth – I was really born in Africa to which I have a lifelong commitment.’ His story pictures a foreigner traveling between America and Africa – matching an identical idea in his inaugural address.”

“Next Obama unconsciously confesses his illegal presidency was a secret revolution against America. Obama instantly provides a second crucial birth marker linking ‘birth’ to ‘revolution.’ Note the phrase: ‘the revolution, he supported the birth.’ The super-intel suggests that Obama, the foreigner in America, leads a secret revolution in which his foreign birth subverts America’s constitutional requirements.”

“In his inauguration address, Obama repeatedly appealed to citizens to hold him to constitutional standards. He declared America was at ‘war against a far-reaching (foreign) network of violence and hatred’ – suggesting as a foreigner he had violently usurped the oath of office.”

“In the U.N. speech, we find numerous calls for a change in leadership – Obama’s unconscious moral compass guiding America to the truth about his fraudulent presidency and what we need to do. Just one example.  ‘We supported a transition of leadership … because the interests of the people were not being served by a corrupt status quo.’ His secret call for a change in the U.S. presidency matches his inauguration speech story about how his foreign-born father could not have been served in a Washington, D.C., restaurant – suggesting Obama cannot serve or be seated as an illegal president.”

Dr Hodges is also the author of The Obama Confession: Secret Fear. Secret Fury.  YouTube has a seven episode video series of Dr. Hodges talking about this book and why President Barack Hussein Obama is a different kind of deceiver, an unscrupulous politician.  You can view them here.

The bottom line is that no matter which direction an investigator turns, Obama is not eligible to hold the office of President of the United States.  Yet I don’t understand why anyone in Washington hasn’t done something about it.  The only answer I can think of is that they are all too afraid of the powerful people behind Obama.  If they could pull off threatening the life of Chelsea Clinton to shut Bill Clinton up four years ago, then no one on Capitol Hill would be safe from similar threats.

These really are scary times!

Previous Candy Crowley, Media Still Baldly Covering for Obama on Libya
Next Moderator of Debate Backs Up Obama’s Lie On Benghazi Attack


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.