Former FBI Leader a Proven Liar


A pair of powerful Congressman are sounding the alarm, but the question is… is anyone listening?

Congressmen Mark Meadows (R-NC) and Jim Jordan (R-OH) are two of the most prominent leaders in the conservative caucus, but thus far their warnings, calls for action, and demands for accountability are going unheeded by their colleagues to the left.

Oddly, it’s not as if Meadows and Jordan are asking for much. The two men have pointed to thousands of inconsistencies, hundreds of problematic conversations, and dozens of questionably legal examples in their effort to have Congress investigate if anything untoward was happening at the FBI over the last few years.

The two men took their case to Fox News earlier this past week and their argument seems to make sense, so why isn’t Congress interested?

take our poll - story continues below

Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Godfather Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: The ‘Science’ Behind Michelle Obama’s Hated School Lunch Rules Ends Up Being a Fraud

Jim Jordan: We do know about Andrew McCabe, he didn’t lie just once, he lied four times. Four times he lied to James Comey, he lied to the office of professional responsibility, he lied twice under oath to the inspector general. Remember, this is Andrew McCabe,  deputy director of the FBI, this is Andrew McCabe, the text messages between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page talk about Andy’s Office where they talked about an ‘insurance policy’ in case Donald Trump is actually President of the United States. So that’s why this is significant. And again, it wasn’t once, it wasn’t twice, it wasn’t even three time, four times he lied about leaking information to the Wall Street Journal about the FBI.

Mark Meadows: “Everybody is saying this is political in nature, when you read the report you see that it is not political because under oath, and certainly with the investigation, it was a real problem…

We need to have this special counsel. I disagree with the Attorney General, and I can tell you tonight: I went through and reviewed some redacted things that were given to our committee, and on seven pages there were twelve material facts –not just names– material facts, that were omitted by the Department of Justice…

You know, the news broke about the meeting that happened with Dennis McDonough… That was redacted. It didn’t stop there. When we look at multiple redactions that have taken place, this Department of Justice is not complying with the subpoena, and with the oversight responsibility that we have in Congress, and so for the Attorney General to suggest that there is not enough there there is extremely disappointing…

Everyone in town knows we need a second special counsel to get to the bottom of this. How can [the DOJ inspector general] investigate his own boss Rod Rosenstein, that’s who he reports to. Mr. Rosenstein? We have to have a second special counsel, and I hope Mr. Sessions realizes that soon.”

Previous Trick, or Treat?
Next The Infidels: Remembering the Armenian Genocide

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.