Has the U.S. Supreme Court Committed Treason?

Article III, Section 3, The Constitution of the United States:

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.  No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

take our poll - story continues below

Will the Democrats try to impeach President Trump now that they control the House?

  • Will the Democrats try to impeach President Trump now that they control the House?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Godfather Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: ‘Houston Chronicle’ Forced to Retract Stories After Reporter’s Work Proven a Fraud

When our Founding Fathers were looking for direction in establishing a governing document, they found none from other nations, past or present that were sufficient for their cause.  When addressing the Constitutional Convention, Benjamin Franklin said:

We have gone back to ancient history for models of government, and examined the different forms of those Republics which having been formed with the seeds of their own dissolution now no longer exist. And we have viewed Modern States all round Europe, but find none of their Constitutions suitable to our circumstances.

John Adams also warned us about what a miserable land this would be if we started to listen to foreign nations when he said:

But should the people of America once become capable of that deep simulation towards one another, and towards foreign nations, which assumes the language of justice and moderation while it is practising iniquity and extravagance, and displays in the most captivating manner the charming pictures of candor, frankness, and sincerity, while it is rioting in rapine and insolence, this country will be the most miserable habitation in the world;…

Our Founding Fathers firmly believed that God gave them divine inspiration in formulating our founding documents, including the Constitution.  To turn to the laws and statutes of foreign nations would have been tantamount to treason at a time when so many sacrificed so much to secure our independence and freedom.

If someone or some other nation were to try to subvert our government, are we not obligated to stand up and let the rest of the country know about it?  To remain silent of such a subversion would make us as equally guilty of treachery as those attempting the subversion.  At least, that is how Patrick Henry felt when he said:

Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.

These days, we have repeated acts of subversion taking place within our nation and we cannot remain silent about it any longer.

Back on May 17, 2010, the United States Supreme Court rendered its decision in the Graham v. Florida case.  In that decision, the majority of the Court cited a 1989 United Nations Treaty that was NEVER approved of or agreed to, by the United States, as the part of the basis for their ruling.

In doing so, the Supreme Court was using foreign laws to define our own Constitution.  Does this constitute Treason as defined by the Constitution?  In order to make a determination, we would have to examine the source of the foreign laws and their intentions towards the United States of America.

The source of the international treaty was the United Nations.

Their intentions towards the United States are hostile to everything our Founding Fathers stood for and wrote into our governing documents.

Proof of their hostile intentions:

  • The United Nations is pressuring the United States to subvert our First Amendment right to free speech with their hate speech laws.  These laws go so far as define hate speech as preaching the Word of God if it offends someone by revealing their sinful behavior.
  • The United Nations is pressuring the United States to subvert the Second Amendment right to bear arms with their Small Arms Treaty.  The purpose of this treaty, and others like it, is to limit and restrict our right to bear most of the sporting and hunting firearms. Incidentally, Secretary of State Hilary Clinton has signed this treaty for the United States.
  • The United Nations has been pressuring the United States to have its military serve and swear allegiance to the United Nations instead of their allegiance to the United States. This has been evidenced with the U.S. military serving under the U.N. peace keeping forces and wearing U.N. insignias on their uniforms.
  • The United Nations has been actively pursuing the redistribution of wealth and technology.  Their goal is to forcibly take the wealth and technology from nations and individuals and GIVE it to other nations and people that are considered to be poor and underdeveloped.
  • The United Nations is actively pursuing the goal of establishing a One World Economy and One World Government which would result in the complete dissolution of the sovereignty of the United States of America.

The list of United Nations actions against the sovereignty of the United States goes on and on, but just those listed should be enough to prove that they are an Enemy of the United States and according to Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution, anyone who is “adhering to the Enemies” is guilty of Treason against our nation.

Article III, Section 3 also states that:

No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. 

When Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court it was an open confession of their “adhering to the Enemies”.  Here are Justice Kennedy’s words:

We also note, as petitioner and his amici emphasize, that Article 37(a) of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, Nov. 20, 1989, 1577 U. N. T. S. 3 (entered into force Sept. 2, 1990), ratified by every nation except the United States and Somalia, prohibits the imposition of ‘life imprisonment without possibility of release . . . for offences committed by persons below eighteen years of age.’

The court has treated the laws and practices of other nations and international agreements as relevant to the Eighth Amendment not because those norms are binding or controlling but because the judgment of the world’s nations that a particular sentencing practice is inconsistent with basic principles of decency demonstrates that the court’s rationale has respected reasoning to support it.

I believe that not only did the Supreme Court committed Treason against the U.S. Constitution, but they have openly confessed the same.

So what course of action do we as citizens take? Listen to the words of Samuel Adams, the Father of the American Revolution:

The liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil Constitution, are worth defending at all hazards; and it is our duty to defend them against all attacks.  We have received them as a fair inheritance from our worthy ancestors; they purchased then for us with toil and danger and expense of treasure and blood, and transmitted them to us with care and diligence.  It will bring an everlasting mark of infamy on the present generation, enlightened as it is, if we should suffer them to be wrested from us by violence without a struggle or to be cheated out of them by the artifices of false and designing men.

If you consider yourself to be patriotic to the United States, then you are obligated by the words of our Founding Fathers to speak out against the treachery of our Supreme Court.

But are you patriotic?

In Noah Webster’s 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language, the definition of patriotism is:

patriotism, n. Love of one’s country; the passion which aims to serve one’s country, either in defending it from invasion, or protecting it rights and maintaining its laws and institutions in vigor and purity.  Patriotism is the characteristic of a good citizen, the noblest passion that animates a man in the character of a citizen.

Do you have the conviction and courage to stand up and speak out to preserve our nation and the Constitution?

If so, then the first thing you need to do is to drop to your knees and pray for our nation, our leaders and for the revival of the Christian Church in America.  Next, get out, support and vote for Christians as the elections come to your area.   Now start writing your congressmen and senators to let them know that they need to do their part to protect the Constitution. And lastly, let all your friends know about this and urge them to do the same.

Finally, what can Congress do to stop the treachery of the Supreme Court?  According to Article II, Section 4 of The Constitution of the United States:

The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

According to the U.S. Constitution, I believe that the Supreme Court justices that concurred with the opinion written by Justice Kennedy last year, MUST be impeached from the bench.  The House of Representatives MUST move to impeach the guilty justices and then the U.S. Senate MUST try them on the Senate floor and find them guilty by their own words and remove these men and women from the highest court in the land before they continue to subvert the Constitution and destroy our country from within.

Previous Limit Terms of Office for Supreme Court Justices
Next Save Them, Save Them, Hurt You, Hurt You


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.