Iowa Judge Rules State Cannot Stop Pro-Lifers From Reading Bible Outside Abortion Clinics

Pro-lifers in Iowa won a small victory when a federal judge ruled that the state could not make a law preventing them from reading scripture outside abortion clinics.

Pro-life advocates Anthony Miano and Nicholas Rolland had taken to standing outside a Davenport, Iowa, abortion clinic and preaching to those entering and leaving the facility. But the state passed a law in 2018 that outlawed their activities.

The law prohibits “loud and raucous noise in the vicinity of any residence or public building which causes unreasonable distress to the occupants thereof,” according to

Trending: Report: Search Site DuckDuckGo Hands User Data Over to Google

Miano and Rolland took the state to court to vacate the law saying that it violated their freedom of speech and freedom of religion.

take our poll - story continues below

Has There Been Voter Fraud in the 2020 Election?(2)

  • Has There Been Voter Fraud in the 2020 Election?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Godfather Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

But on Sept. 26, U.S. District Court Judge Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger ruled against the state law. And this month, the judge ordered the state to pay $130,000 for the pair’s legal fees.

The American Center for Law & Justice, the group responsible for helping the couple with their lawsuit, celebrated the ruling saying, “This is an important victory for our clients, for pro-life advocates and the unborn, and for free speech.”

“In essence, these individuals were threatened with a prosecution for engaging in protected speech outside of an abortion clinic,” said ACLJ Director of Policy Professor Harry Hutchison. “We challenged the constitutionality of the Iowa law which makes it a misdemeanor to make a loud and raucous noise in the vicinity of any residence or public building which causes unreasonable distress to the occupants, thereof.”

Judge Ebinger said that the Iowa law was unconstitutionally vague and violated free speech rights.

“Essentially, this law was unconstitutionally vague, and second, dependent on the reaction to third parties,” Hutchinson added. “We’re happy to report that the judge found in favor of our clients on the merits. Essentially the statute was declared unconstitutional.”

Thus far the state has not replied to the ruling.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on

Don't forget to Like Godfather Politics on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Godfather Politics email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

You Might Like
Previous Democrats Go Wild Trying To Justify Attack On Barron Trump
Next New York High School Students Walk Out Because There are too Many White Kids

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon to the right of the comment, and report it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation. If you don't see a commenting section below, please disable your adblocker.