Judge Bars Trump From Adding Citizenship Question To 2020 Census


A federal judge in New York bars the Trump administration from adding a citizenship question to the 2020 census.

“Secretary Ross’s decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census even if it did not violate the Constitution itself was unlawful for a multitude of independent reasons and must be set aside,” Judge Jesse M. Furman wrote.

Throwing Americans under the bus in the interest of social justice. These judge’s need to be stopped ASAP!

Trending: North Carolina Middle School Brings in Transvestites and Drag Queens for Kid’s ‘Self-Esteem’

NBC:

take our poll - story continues below

Who are the happiest people?

  • Who are the happiest people?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Godfather Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

A federal judge blocked the Trump administration Tuesday from asking about citizenship status on the 2020 census, the first major ruling in cases contending that officials ramrodded the question through for Republican political purposes to intentionally undercount immigrants.

In a 277-page decision that won’t be the final word on the issue, Judge Jesse M. Furman ruled that while such a question would be constitutional, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross had added it arbitrarily and not followed proper administrative procedures.

“He failed to consider several important aspects of the problem; alternately ignored, cherry-picked, or badly misconstrued the evidence in the record before him; acted irrationally both in light of that evidence and his own stated decisional criteria; and failed to justify significant departures from past policies and practices,” Furman wrote.

Ross’ explanations for his decision were “unsupported by, or even counter to, the evidence before the agency,” the judge said.

Among other things, the judge said, Ross didn’t follow a law requiring that he give Congress three years notice of any plan to add a question about citizenship to the census.

The ruling came in cases in which 18 states, the District of Columbia, and 15 big cities or counties, and immigrants’ rights groups argued that the Commerce Department, which designs the census, had failed to properly analyze the effect the question would have on households where immigrants live.  More

According to Benny Huang, illegal aliens also warp the census data so that big, liberal states such as New York and California receive more representation in Congress than they are entitled to. They are literally stealing House seats from other states.

This is nothing short of tyranny by the unelected, unaccountable judicial system. This is what happens when a judge is more activist than a jurist, but as a bleeding heart liberal, it is all that he is capable of. Finding any excuse he could to fit into the liberal agenda and that is against the best interest of the American people.

You Might Like
Previous BREAKING: Man Arrested For Plot To Carry Out Jihadist Attacks Against Locations That Include The White House
Next Fighting for Green Justice in France Leads to Yellow Vest Protests

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.