Judge Blocks California Law Requiring Presidential Candidates to Reveal Tax Returns


A federal judge handed Donald Trump a big victory for his 2020 re-election campaign, Thursday, by blocking a California law that would require candidates running for president to reveal their tax returns to qualify for the state’s ballot.

U.S. District Judge Morrison England Jr. issued an injunction blocking the state law.

The state law, signed by Gov. Newsom in July, was created specifically to remove Donald Trump from California’s 2020 ballot.

Trending: Ocasio-Cortez: We Must Nationalize American Society So We Can Have More Freedom

In his ruling, Judge England said that the law would cause “irreparable harm without temporary relief” for candidates including attempting to get on the state’s election ballot.

take our poll - story continues below

Has Adam Schiff committed fraud and treason concerning the Trump probe?

  • Has Adam Schiff committed fraud and treason concerning the Trump probe?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Godfather Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trump sued the state over the law claiming it violated his and every other candidate’s right to privacy.

According to the Los Angeles Times:

England spent much of the court proceeding on the question of whether a longstanding federal financial disclosure law preempts any additional rules that a state could impose. The federal law, known as the Ethics In Government Act, or EIGA, was originally passed in 1978 and applies to a range of top federal officials. Trump has filed the annual report, most recently in May, which provides an overview of his finances.

“Do we even need to get here if EIGA preempts [the new California law]?,” England asked in court of attorneys for the state. “Is that it?”

England insisted that the state’s requirement was essentially unconstitutional.

But a representative for the state insisted that the state’s law is perfectly legal.

“We remain firm in our belief that SB 27 is constitutional and provides invaluable transparency for voters as they decide who will hold the most powerful office in the United States,” California Secretary of State Alex Padilla said.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.

Don't forget to Like Godfather Politics on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at RepublicanLegion.com.

You Might Like
Previous Here’s A Third Blackface Incident From Justin Trudeau, This One On Video
Next Another one bites the dust: Another 2020 Democrat sees the writing on the wall

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon to the right of the comment, and report it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.