During his Thursday show, conservative talker Mark Levin slammed the fake news in the Mueller report and called its back door attempt to destroy Trump “B.S. from top to bottom.”
The Mueller report is a two-part affair. The first part completely exonerates Trump from the fake charge of “collusion” with Russia. Mueller found no prof at all that Trump, his family, or his campaign worked with Russia to affect the 2016 elections.
But the second part is the “B.S.” part for Mueller went way beyond his actual job on the matter of “obstruction.” While Mueller found no proof that Trump tried to obstruct justice, he went way beyond his charge by detailing all sorts of unsavory behavior by the president. Essentially the report is a road map to help Democrats launch impeachment.
Legally, Mueller had no right to go this far in his report. Legally, all he was supposed to do was either find proof of obstruction and lay out that proof. But if he didn’t not have such proof his legal charge should have been not to say anything at all. His duty should not be to impugn people unless there is proof of wrongdoing.
He had none but went after Trump, anyway.
And that is what Levin criticized as a “crap report.”
“This is a 400-page report – two volumes – I’m not going to sit here and read it to you. What is it, the Bible? What is Mueller Moses? Did he come down from Mount Sinai?
“It’s a crap report. Volume Two has almost no redactions. You want to know why Volume Two has almost no redactions – the obstruction volume? Because it’s all crap. It’s not based on serious prosecutorial examination and investigation. It’s one, long New York Times Op-Ed – filled with, this one said this and this one said that, he sat over here, he looked over there, and you know what he told Christie, and who cares?”
The claims by “so-called” reporters and legal analysts that the report contains “real evidence” of collusion and grounds to indict Trump were “all B.S., from top to bottom, from left to right,” Levin said.
He went on:
“For nearly three years, the media, on and on and on about collusion. You had so-called reporters, so-called anchormen and women, so-called former federal prosecutors, so-called legal analysts, a conga line going on and on: ‘We have real evidence, ladies and gentlemen, of collusion – and I’d be surprised if the president isn’t indicted. I’d be surprised if he’s not indicted secretly and it’s under seal and they told the statute of limitations and when he leaves, they go for it.’
“We heard it all, all of it: all B.S., from top to bottom, from left to right.”
And, without collusion, Mueller had no reason to investigate Trump, other than a desire to “get” him, his report reveals that “The basis for the entire scam has been exposed.”
“All the misapplication of process, the misapplication of logic here. You have a prosecutor who was out to get the president of the United States. And, he couldn’t. No collusion – which means the basis for the entire scam has been exposed.
“There need not have been a special counsel. There need not have been FISA warrants. There need not have been spies in the Trump Campaign.”
Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.