North Dakota Could Eliminate Property Taxes

Update, 6/12/12, 8:25 p.m. Pacific time:  The returns are in, and the proposal to eliminate property taxes in North Dakota has been defeated, according to the Associated Press. The opposition campaign was led by teachers unions and local governments.

Today, the voters of North Dakota will get a chance to do what most of us can only dream of — eliminate property taxes.

Predictably, politicians, business lobby groups and unions are all against such a drastic move, but what’s putting the goal within reach of long-time anti-tax proponents is the state’s oil boom.

take our poll - story continues below

Will the Democrats try to impeach President Trump now that they control the House?

  • Will the Democrats try to impeach President Trump now that they control the House?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Godfather Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: ‘Houston Chronicle’ Forced to Retract Stories After Reporter’s Work Proven a Fraud

Rather than shrink from developing its resources as so many states have done in this “green” era, North Dakota is producing 575,000 barrels of oil daily. In 2006, it was the ninth largest oil producer among the states. Now it’s No. 2, and it’s projected to soon be challenging Texas for the No. 1 spot.

The oil boom has worked wonders for North Dakota’s economy. The state is flush with money, jobs and a rising standard of living, which is more than can be said for states like California that have turned their back on real energy development in favor of “renewable” energy, which is mostly proving to be a dead end.

The boom has brought waves of new jobs to the state and resulted in unprecedented development and housing construction as cities scramble to make room for the newcomers.

It’s not all puppies and roses, however. Some property owners don’t necessarily have the mineral rights to oil under their own land, which has led to some instances of oil wells being drilled against property owners’ wishes.

On the plus side, because much of the drilling has occurred on private property, it has largely kept the Obama Administration from crashing the party.

However, the environmentalist crowd has been lobbying to get the hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” technique of oil production banned, claiming damage to water tables and general badness. Considering the oil industry has been fracking for a half century without any of the catastrophes environmentalists now claim to be alarmed about, it’s obvious the real goal is simply to prevent fossil fuel use and block economic development.

Fracking is also expensive. It’s highly profitable for now because of a combination of new technology and unreasonable prices for oil.

But for the moment, North Dakota is golden. Its property tax brings in about $800 million annually, which starts to look like a pittance in light of the $2 billion projected from oil revenue over the next two years.

In a country where the federal government claims monthly unemployment over 8 percent as a sign of improvement and middle class families have seen 40 percent income drops since 2007, North Dakota boasts communities where up to nine jobs go unfilled for every existing working resident and family incomes have increased 130 percent over the past decade.

So voters find themselves with a rare opportunity to rid themselves of a burden that has been on their shoulders since the 1800s. If voters repeal the tax, North Dakota will be the first state since 1980 to eliminate a major tax.

And it’s all thanks to the power of oil and free-market capitalism.

Previous Obama’s Private Sector History Reveals Role in Foreclosures and Bankruptcies of Chicago’s Black Community
Next Obama Campaign Creates Race-Based Ad


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.