It’s funny that the left can consistently find things that are clearly not in the Constitution and discount or completely ignore those things that clearly are in the document.
Decade after decade we’ve heard the constant drumbeat of the left exclaiming the separation of church and state that it’s the law and we must take care not to co-mingle religion and the state.
I’ve read the Constitution many times and can state unequivocally that the separation of church and state is not written nor even implied in the Constitution.
What is clear, to anyone who cares to take a peek, is the separation of powers. That is as plain as the nose on my brother’s face.
Yet there doesn’t seem to be a separation any longer. There appear to be no branches of government that are separate but equal. Somewhere along the American timeline our constitutional republic has been replaced with some kind of three-class system.
But what about “we the people”? There is no “we the people.” We are merely indentured servants of the State, lower than the low.
Our federal legislative branch, the House and Senate, have become the lower or serf class. They have to answer to the parliamentarian class, the executive branch, who in turn must ultimately bow to the will of the rulers, the judicial branch.
How did we morph into such a society? Easy; from a single Supreme Court decision. It’s called judicial review and was set up long ago.
The 1803 decision of the Marshall Court in Marbury v Madison set this country on a path to judicial tyranny.
The eventuality of that one Supreme Court decision has effectively nullified the Tenth Amendment — states’ rights — and rendered individual state constitutions virtually meaningless.
Yet in the Constitution, the supreme law of the land, a review of Article III, section 2 nowhere states or implies judicial review of the Constitution.
Folks (I sound like Bill O’Reilly), the Constitution is quite simple to understand. It’s made to appear complex so that the common man feels reliant upon “scholars” to explain to us idiots what the founders “really” meant.
In fact, it was written and enacted for and by the states thus granting states most of the power. It would not have been ratified otherwise.
That is why, unlike today’s legislation, it is not at all a lengthy document. It didn’t have to be. Any power not specifically enumerated in the Constitution to the federal government reverts back to the states and thus the people. It’s really that simple.
Yet we have allowed the Supreme Court to usurp their mandated authority.
Thomas Jefferson wrote of the danger of the court in 1823:
“At the establishment of our constitutions, the judiciary bodies were supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the government. Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous; that the insufficiency of the means provided for the removal gave them a freehold and irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only, pass silent and unheeded by the public at large; that these decisions, nevertheless, become law by precedent, sapping, by little and little, the foundations of the Constitution, and working its change by construction, before anyone has perceived that that invisible and helpless worm has been busily employing in consuming its substance. In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life, if secured against all liability to account.”
There’s that word, precedent. Makes my skin crawl.
Ditto Abraham Lincoln: “We, the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts — not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the Constitution.”
But with the recent Supreme Court decision nullifying a legally binding California state constitutional amendment on marriage, I’ve concluded that ship has sailed.
The fix is now in and that decision marks the end of states’ rights and the Tenth Amendment. We will soon be known as the “United Community of America,” a centuries-old progressive dream come true.