By Paul Dowling
Citation from Orson Welles’ movie Citizen Kane:
Emily Kane to her husband Charles the newspaper publisher, followed by his response: “Really, Charles, people will think . . .” “. . . what I tell them to think!” This quote illustrates how Newspaperman Kane, reared by a banker, sees it as his duty to tell people what to think.
“I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world, no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.” —Woodrow Wilson
Russian Collusion: Fake News & Fake History
With the issuance of the Mueller Report—courtesy of Special Counsel Robert Mueller and his band of thirteen angry Democrats—it became obvious to most Americans that Donald Trump was right to accuse those declaring he colluded with Russia of reporting fake news. Next comes the writing of fake history, wherein the academic establishment will seek to portray the report exonerating Trump as a cover-up, despite the composition of the investigation team as being made up of what Trump has called “thirteen hardened Democrats,” in addition to Robert Mueller, an establishment RINO (Republican In Name Only) whose own collusion with Russia in the Uranium One Scandal clearly compromises his own integrity. Even though Mueller’s team represented a veritable stacked deck that was dealt Trump by DC elites, and despite the fact it was endorsed and protected by Congressional Democrats, the finding that there was no collusion with Russia by Trump, since it runs counter to the narrative of the Left, will likely be rewritten by the Democrats; they will find some way to write collusion by Trump into the narrative the same way they have written the Democrats’ creation of the Ku Klux Klan out of the narrative. (Mueller may have thrown Democrats a bone by writing that he could not exonerate Trump of obstruction—despite the nonpartisan finding by both Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, a Democrat, and Attorney General William Barr, a Republican, that, without a finding of collusion, there is nothing to obstruct.
So, sticking with the Russian narrative for the time being, the truth about history is that it has become increasingly apparent to serious researchers that much of what is written in American history books about Russia is fake history or, at a minimum, compromised history. And why would this not be true, since historians so often write history based upon biased—or sometimes even fake—news accounts? This author can remember learning about the Russian Revolution in high school, back in the 1970s. The teacher taught that the Bolsheviks took over the Russian government in the October Revolution of 1917—end of story. The history books in the library all offered the same narrative. And there was no Internet to search for any credible counter-narrative. So, the history teacher must be forgiven for not teaching that there were actually two revolutions that year, the first one being the February Revolution. Even today’s Wikipedia, which does make mention of the February Revolution, gives it short shrift. G. Edward Griffin, however, the author of The Creature from Jekyll Island, writes a well-researched account that will surprise many (in Chapter Fourteen of that work): “The second revolution, called the October Revolution, was the one through which the Bolsheviks came to power. It was, in fact, no revolution at all. It was a coup d’état. . . . With a combination of bribes and propaganda, they recruited several regiments of soldiers and sailors and, in the early morning darkness of October 25, methodically took military possession of all government buildings and communication centers. . . . By dawn, without the Russian people even knowing what had happened—much less having any voice in that action—their country had been captured by a minority faction and became the world’s first so-called ‘people’s republic.’ . . . That is how the Communists seized Russia and that is how they held it afterward. Contrary to the Marxian myth, they have never represented the people. They simply have the guns.” (The Bolsheviks, true to the ideals of totalitarian socialism, did not allow the people to keep and bear arms.) And, of course, all of this was supported by the central bankers back in New York. According to Griffin, “The fact is that Lenin and Trotsky were not sent [from Switzerland and New York, respectively] to Russia to overthrow the anti-Semitic Tsar. Their assignment from Wall Street was to overthrow the [February] revolution [that had succeeded in setting up the first democratic society in Russian history].”
Lying Bonesmen & the Obscuration of History: Why Deep Research Is Necessary
The truth is that one can only peel away the many layers of the proverbial onion that is history by doing deep research, since only surface history—which is so often just outright false—is what is being explicitly taught at school. This is the same problem Americans have been having with their news media. While the truth is available in most cases, it must be actively sought, filtered, and compared against multiple versions. Most people, when listening to a speaker, tend to assume that what the speaker is saying is true, that what is known as the Maxim of Quality is not being violated. Liars, of course, take advantage of this. And most journalists have, over time, become little more than paid liars.
But why is dishonesty in the news media so universal? Why do establishment journalists tend to echo one another, without any diversity of thought or difference of opinion, the way normal people interact? Why is there no natural conversation among media outlets, with differing sets of conclusions being drawn and different kinds of opinions being expressed? With the possible exception of Fox News, which is the youngest of the major news outlets, the legacy media are all of one voice. Much of this is perhaps due to the fact that the American Historical Association was started by Yale graduate and Bonesman Andrew Dickson White, who was also the first president of Cornell University. White’s role as a preëminent American historian allowed the globalist Order of Skull & Bones tremendous influence in an important field that would cross-pollinate many others, including the fields of literature and journalism.
Building a Narrative: Did the Central Bank Play a Key Role?
The Federal Reserve Bank was created in 1913, when President Woodrow Wilson signed its creation into law. Wilson was an indisputable internationalist who wanted a New World Order, a one-world government. Although he claimed to be a pacifist, he actually plotted with the central bankers for war. Of course, the central bankers found war highly profitable, especially when they found that they could fund both sides in the creation of the carnage, as well as funding the clean-up and rebuilding that would have to take place in the aftermath. According to Revisionist.Net, “Sometimes, the bankers financed both sides. The Rothschilds’ agents, the Warburg banking house, were financing the Kaiser. Paul Warburg, a naturalized citizen from Germany who had been decorated by the Kaiser in 1912, was vice chairman of the Federal Reserve Board. He had also handled large sums furnished by Germany for Lenin and Trotsky while his brother Max (who was Kaiser Wilhelm’s personal banker) was the leader of the German espionage system! It was this brother, Max, who authorized Lenin’s train to pass through the lines and execute the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. Jacob Schiff, like the Warburgs, also had two brothers in Germany during the war, Philip and Ludwig, who also were active as bankers to the German Government.” This activism of bankers on a global scale had little to do with using capitalism to promote freedom among the people, while it had everything to do with consolidating power into the hands of an elite few. This is why so many rich families, to this day, work to assist the globalist agenda of socialists—who were called Fascists in wartime Germany and who are called Democrats in America today.
Wilson: A Victim of the Monster He Helped Create?
President Wilson’s realization of just how powerful the central bankers had become in just a few short years, since the creation of the Fed, caused him to make, on at least one occasion, a regretful comment: “I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men.” These few men to whom Wilson was referring—bankers—were, especially in their growing control of the newspapers, becoming capable of dictating whatever narratives they wished to see appear in print. This meant that, in order to get reelected, Wilson would have to agree to help the bankers in their goal of entering the Great War.
So, the bank-controlled newspapers helped Wilson win a second term (in a pacifist campaign wherein the president promised the people that he would keep America out of war) in exchange for Wilson’s secret pledge to the bankers to go to war in Europe. Of course, secret dealings with bankers are not uncommon, even today: It was Barack Obama who basically allowed the bankers at Citibank to choose his cabinet for him; and Hillary Clinton gave secret speeches to bankers during her presidential campaign. Writes Griffin: “Wall Street control over important segments of the media was considerable. George Wheeler tells us: ‘Around this time the Morgan firm was choosing the top executives for the old and troubled Harper & Brothers publishing House. . . . In the newspaper field, Pierpont Morgan at this period was in effective control of the New York Sun, . . . the Boston News Bureau, Barron’s magazine, and the Wall Street Journal.’ . . . In addition the Morgan Trust exercised media control by its power of advertising. . . . Morgan control over the media at that time is well documented, but he was by no means alone in this. . . . Lundberg comments . . . : ‘After the J.P. Morgan bloc, the Rockefellers have the most advertising of any group to dispose of.’”
The Federal Reserve: A Den of Bonesmen
Andrew Jackson once referred to the central bankers of the Second Bank of the United States as a “den of vipers.” The Federal Reserve and its member banks may similarly be referred to as a “den of Bonesmen,” the Fed having been heavily influenced by members of the Order of Skull & Bones in its establishment. Franklin MacVeagh, who would champion the cause for currency reform during his years working as Secretary of the Treasury for fellow Bonesman William Howard Taft, definitely helped lay the groundwork for the enactment of a law creating a third incarnation of a central bank in America, although it was, in fact, Bonesman Pierre Jay who became the “first-ever chairman of the New York Federal Reserve in 1913 after its formation.” Bonesman George L. Harrison, after first serving as general counsel to the Federal Reserve Board, served as president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for 13 years starting in 1928. From January 1st, 1945, until May 12th, 1949, Bonesman Charles E. Adams served as Fed Chair for the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
Percy Avery Rockefeller, while he was not a member of the Federal Reserve Board, was a Bonesman who was an influential banker in New York City at the time of the Fed’s founding. The bank that he managed was the First National City Bank of New York, later to be called Citibank. And, of course, Bonesman Prescott Sheldon Bush, a father and grandfather to two fellow Bonesmen who would both become presidents of the United States—George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush—worked as a Wall Street executive investment banker who eventually would be elected to the US Senate. And keep in mind that it was members of the Order of Skull & Bones (such as George H.W. Bush, William Bundy, James Jesus Angleton, and Frederick Trubee Davison) who were largely influential in the intelligence community during the early years of the Central Intelligence Agency, which would later be responsible for infiltrating America’s news media directly, under the aegis of Operation Mockingbird, thereby officially turning America’s news into a propaganda arm of the CIA—or what President Trump might refer to as “fake news, the enemy of the people.” (While technically a part of the executive branch of the US government, the CIA has, in all actuality, been acting since its inception to enforce the will of the central bankers and the Deep State that supports them. Nobody understands all of this better than Democrat Chuck Schumer, whose revealing warning to President Trump about the CIA and its sister organizations, was striking: “Let me tell you,” said Schumer, “you take on the intelligence community—they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.”)
Journalism & Literature: Bonesmen Excel by Influencing Minds in Reportage & Belles-Lettres
Henry Luce, the founder of Time Magazine and perhaps “the most influential private citizen in the America of his day,” was a member and devotee of the Order of Skull & Bones. Perhaps the Skull & Bones connection to the German Thule Society, of which Adolf Hitler was a member, might help to explain the ease with which Time chose Hitler as its 1938 Man of the Year. Archibald MacLeish, the winner of three Pulitzers and an influential Librarian of Congress, was a member of the Order of Skull & Bones, the same being true for two-time Pulitzer Prize winning historian and author David McCullough. William F. Buckley, Jr., founder of the National Review, was also a Bonesman.
While the ultimate goal of the Order of Skull & Bones is a New World Order based upon one-world government, the Hegelian Dialectic is always in play, which is facilitated by having Bonesmen argue from both sides of any issue, in order to direct the public towards the predetermined solution desired by the Order, all courtesy of a compliant news media. General Maddox, writing for Infowars, puts it this way: “Almost all major events in history employ the Hegelian Dialectic of: Problem—manufacture a crisis or take advantage of one already in place in order to get the desired Reaction of public outcry whereby the public demands a Solution which has been predetermined from the beginning.”
It is in pursuit of the New World Order (a goal that Skull & Bones has shared with the Nazis, via the Thule Society) that the Mockingbird media have striven to direct the American people. Whereas an argumentative free press reflects a diversity of opinion in all matters, a “mockingbird press” enforces conformity of opinion in the mouths and from the pens of “thought leaders” by means of CIA handlers dictating what the messaging should be. Although the official narrative denies that this true, calling it a “conspiracy theory,” it is, in actuality, a conspiracy fact. It is interesting that the Mueller Report was issued on March 22nd—or 3/22—since 322 is the numerical motto of the Order of Skull & Bones. Was issuing the report on that particular date only a coincidence, or was it a message from President Trump—via Attorney General Barr—directed at the Order of Skull & Bones? Was it perhaps a warning that Trump and the Patriots are about to fight back against the Deep State Cabal with unprecedented vigor and zeal? The Deep State had its turn, as it directed a McCarthyesque witch-hunt against the president for years! Now it is the turn of Trump and the Patriots.
Guidance from Q
There is much more to the world, however, than Hegelian Dialectics and predestined outcomes, chosen by Wizard-of-Oz-like central bankers hiding behind a curtain of deception. Lied to by fake history books, fake news media, and corporatist university systems, the American people are now experiencing what Q refers to as a Great Awakening: “The Great Awakening (‘Freedom of Thought’),” writes Q, “was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment). When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT, it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable. When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective) and have ‘free thought.’ ‘Free thought’ is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma. When you are awake, you are able to clearly see. The choice is yours, and yours alone. Trust and put faith in yourself. You are not alone and you are not in the minority. Difficult truths will soon see the light of day. WWG1WGA [Where We Go One, We Go All]!!!”
Who Is Paul Dowling?
Paul Dowling is an American patriot who believes that individual freedom and minority rights that only a republic can protect are the linchpin of Western Civilization. Paul has written a book on the Constitution, explaining the republican values on which it is based and how they protect against the dangers of a strictly majoritarian system of governance. The book is called Keeping a Free Republic: Learning the Blueprint for Liberty in the Constitution & the Bill of Rights. (It is on sale at Amazon, for $6.25 in paperback and $0.99 as a Kindle download.