The Fake Research Liberals Use to Complain About ‘Gun Violence’


Liberals are ramping up a major anti-gun agenda for 2019 in Washington D.C. But nearly every “statistic” they use to prove their case is built on lies.

The anti-gun agenda is already in full swing in Oregon, Washington State, California, Illinois, and New York, but with Nancy Pelosi now in the Speaker’s chair in Congress, the push to nationalize the bad, un-American ideas being implemented in these far, far left states is going national.

But nearly every bit of “research” and every “statistic” these liberals use to prove their case is built on lies.

Trending: Watch Out Hillary Because Tulsi Gabbard Has Lawyers Involved Now

John Stossel recently did a great job exposing these lies in a recent column.

take our poll - story continues below

Would election by popular vote be better than the electoral college?

  • Would election by popular vote be better than the electoral college?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Godfather Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Take the left’s claims about school shootings:

Last year, they claimed that there were school shootings at “hundreds of schools.” It was “an almost daily occurrence” in the U.S., some said.

This was nonsense. NPR reporters looked into the 235 shootings reported by the U.S. Department of Education and were only able to confirm 11 of them.

It turned out that schools were added to the list merely because someone at a school heard there may have been a shooting. Good for NPR for checking out the Education Department’s claim.

Then there were the recent claims that nearly every “news” outlet used accusing the U.S.A. of having more mass shootings than any other nation.

But is that true?

Citing researcher John Lott, Stossel says the claim is all a bunch of B.S.

But the U.S. doesn’t have the most mass shootings, says Lott. It’s a myth created by University of Alabama associate professor Adam Lankford, a myth repeated by anti-gun media in hundreds of news stories.

“Lankford claimed that since 1966 there were 90 mass public shooters in the United States, more than any other country,” says Lott. “Lankford claimed ‘complete data’ were available from 171 countries.”

But how could that be? Many governments don’t collect such data and even fewer have information from before the days of the internet.

Lott claimed that the study’s method was flawed, but even using that standard, Lott found that the study was filled with lies.

When Lott’s research center checked the data, using Lankford’s own definition of a mass shooting, “four or more people killed,” the center found 3,000 shootings around the world. Lankford claimed there were only 202.

Lankford said he excludes “sponsored terrorism” but does not define what he means by that. To be safe, Lott removed terrorism cases from his data. He still found 709 shootings – more than triple the number Lankford reported.

So, after all that, is the U.S. a mass shooting leader?

Nope:

It turns out that not only did the U.S. not have the most frequent mass shootings, it was No. 62 on the list, lower than places like Norway, Finland and Switzerland.

Folks, whenever these Democrats start using these fake news statistics, call them out on it.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.

Don't forget to Like Godfather Politics on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at RepublicanLegion.com.

Previous Trump Administration Moves to Cancel $929 Million in Wasteful California High-Speed Rail Funding
Next Snowflakes Attack WWII Soldier Statue Thinking it is a Confederate Soldier

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon to the right of the comment, and report it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.