Trump Administration’s Reaction To Israel/Hamas Conflict Is MUCH Different Than Obama’s


The American government’s reaction to this weekend’s Hamas rocket barrage and Israel self-defense was much different than that of the Obama administration. The response of the ever-growing list of Democratic Party candidates for president was also unusual.

The Trump Administration reaction to the conflict was similar to that of the previous administration with one significant difference, there was no “but,” “both sides,” or “show restraint.”

With each conflict between Israel and Hamas during the Obama administration, there would be a declaration that the United States supported Israel’s right to defend herself. But they wouldn’t end there, they would usually add a false equivalency statement that inferred both sides were responsible for the violence.

Trending: WATCH: Portland High School Coach Disarms Gun-Toting Student, Then Hugs Him

The 2014 conflict began with a Hamas rocket barrage. Amid the rocket attacks Jen Psaki, the State Department Spox told the media. “No country should be expected to stand by while rocket attacks from a terrorist organization are launching into their country.”  She continued with a false equivalency statement, “At the same time, in the secretary’s conversation, in the conversations of all of our senior administration officials, they’ve been encouraging all sides to de-escalate the situation.”  That statement neglected the fact that for “all sides to de-escalate” Hamas had to stop firing rockets.

take our poll - story continues below

Has Adam Schiff committed fraud and treason concerning the Trump probe?

  • Has Adam Schiff committed fraud and treason concerning the Trump probe?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Godfather Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

This past Saturday as Hamas was firing rockets into Israel,  State Dept. Spox Morgan Ortega provided this statement to the press:

“The United States strongly condemns the ongoing barrage of rocket attacks by Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad from Gaza upon innocent civilians and their communities across Israel. We call on those responsible for the violence to cease this aggression immediately. We stand with Israel and fully support its right to self-defense against these abhorrent attacks.”

Jason Greenblatt, Special Asst. to the President for Special Negotiations added his two cents on Twitter,

No false equivalency in either of those statements,

Five years ago, the AP reported that then-President Obama “condemned the rocket attacks and said Israel has the right to self-defense. But Obama also urged both sides not to escalate the crisis and to restore calm.” Obama didn’t seem to care that only one side could restore calm, Hamas who started the conflict and continued the violence by firing rockets into southern Israel.

On Sunday, as Hamas was launching rockets at Israel, President Trump tweeted a different message:

V.P. Pence tweeted,

Notice what’s missing? A false equivalency statement.

As of this writing, there are twenty-one Democrats are running for the party’s nomination to face president Trump in 2020. Usually during campaigns; even when candidates aren’t particularly friendly toward the Jewish State they will make a statement condemning Hamas rocket attacks, and if necessary for their base, they will add false equivalency statement. Perhaps another indication of the Democratic Party’s distancing itself from Israel is the fact that as of this writing, Monday morning, not a single one of the twenty-one candidates mentioned the Hamas rocket attacks. Even worse is the fact that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has been silent, and the Senate Minority leader New York’s own Senator Chuck Schumer.

Perhaps he was too busy trying to impeach the president or trying to hold AG Barr in contempt for not wanting to break the law about grand jury testimony. Maybe he is only trying to impress the Mullahs who he made happy with his support for the Iran deal because Rep. Jerry Nadler the Democrat who represents NY’s 10th Congressional District has been silent about the attack on Israel.  Nadler’s silence seemed strange because 38% of his constituents are Jewish, making it the most Jewish Congressional District in the country (but then again, his vote in favor of the JCPOA was strange also).

Steny Hoyer (D-MD), the House Majority leader, made a strong statement supporting Israel that said in part:

“Hamas must immediately stop launching rockets into Israel.  The targeting of innocent communities is never acceptable, as is the exploitation of protected sites like schools and mosques by Hamas and its affiliates for the purpose of launching attacks. Israel has every right to defend itself against these rocket attacks from Gaza.”

But the new crop of Congressional Democrats seemed to reflect the Democratic Party’s move away from supporting Israel that began long before they were elected. For example, Rep. Ilan Omar (D-MN) tweeted,

Occupation? Israel left Gaza in August 2005. I can personally confirm that fact because I was visiting Israel at the time.  Perhaps Rep. Omar didn’t read the newspapers that day.

Additionally, there is no cycle of violence, it starts and ends with Hamas. Since it took over Gaza in 2007 Hamas has the Gaza Strip a staging ground for rocket and terrorist attacks.

Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) objected to a NY Times headline “Gaza Militants Fire 250 Rockets and Israel Responds With Airstrikes.”

If she was honest, Tlaib would understand that it is Hamas that is oppressing the people of Gaza.

The American administration’s reaction to Hamas rocket launches into Israel, and Israel’s self-defense is much different in 2019 that it was in 2014. There is no equivocation as there had been in the past. The Trump administration’s stance is, Hamas needs to stop firing rockets, and Israel’s self-defense is justified—PERIOD.

Supporters of Israel who will vote in the 2020 elections should carefully consider the silence of the twenty-one Democratic candidates/ Their silence can only mean they are intimidated by the anti-Israel progressives who dominate their party. If they cannot muster a statement about Hamas rocket attacks as candidates, they will not feel the need to support the Jewish State if (God-forbid) they’re elected.

Don't forget to Like Godfather Politics on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at RepublicanLegion.com.

You Might Like
Previous Hillary Clinton Still Says Election Was Stolen From Her, But Did Jon Stewart Steal It?
Next Rob Schneider Slams Orwellian Censorship by Liberal Media

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon to the right of the comment, and report it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.