UK Judge Orders Disabled Woman to Have Abortion Against Her Will


A British judge has ordered a disabled woman to have an abortion to kill her 22-week-old fetus even though the pregnant woman does not want to have an abortion.

The judge, Justice Nathalie Lieven, has proclaimed her decision is in the mentally disabled pregnant woman’s “best interest,” Fox News reported.

“I am acutely conscious of the fact that for the State to order a woman to have a termination where it appears that she doesn’t want it is an immense intrusion,” the autocratic monster said on Friday. “I have to operate in [her] best interests, not on society’s views of termination.”

Trending: Since The Media Won’t Report it, Here are Dozens of Anti-American Statements by ‘The Squad’

The pregnant woman is in her 20s and is in the care of the National Health Services. She reportedly has the mental capacity of a nine-year-old.

take our poll - story continues below

Which Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has The Wildest Campaign Promise So Far?

  • Which Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has The Wildest Campaign Promise So Far?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Godfather Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

But the disabled woman’s mother, a Roman Catholic, opposes the abortion and apparently so does the woman’s pregnant daughter.

Even the social worker handling the pregnant woman’s case said that the pregnancy should not be terminated. She feels that everyone involved understands what is at stake with the pregnancy.

But the judge insisted that the pregnant woman does not have the mental capacity to understand the decision of giving birth and cannot make decisions for herself.

“I think she would like to have a baby in the same way she would like to have a nice doll,” the judge exclaimed over objections from the social worker.

The judge also claimed that having the baby would be even more traumatic than terminating it because the mentally incapable mother could not care for the child.

“Pregnancy, although real to her, doesn’t have a baby outside her body she can touch,” this idiot judge added.

But… does ANONE expect that to happen? Who expects a mentally incapacitated woman to care for a baby?

Wouldn’t the mentally incapable woman’s mother take custody of the baby?

It is still unclear how the woman became pregnant and police are investigating the incident as a crime and likely rape.

UPDATE

On June 24, a British appeals court overruled the heartless, murderous, eugenicist judge that demanded the woman have an abortion against her will.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.

You Might Like
Previous Trump Administration Set to Launch Immigration Raids Across U.S.A. on Sunday
Next Nine Hispanics Moved Into Texas for Every One White Person in 2018

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.