Watch this Video before YouTube, Google, and Facebook Ban It!

A number of years ago I was asked to speak to a political science class at Emory University. As usual, the subject of abortion came up. I have a simple way to demonstrate the absurdity of abortion and the claim that an unborn baby is not a separate human being deserving the full protection of the law

The standard argument is that a woman has a right over her body. If she wants a tattoo, a tummy tuck, or breast augmentation, no one is stopping her. Even if a woman absurdly believes she is really a man, there’s no one stopping her from lopping off her female body parts to make the transition to look like a man (while still being a woman). The body parts are hers.

But an unborn baby is not part of a woman’s body like an appendix. In fact, if an unborn baby was not protected in its amniotic sack, the woman’s body’s immune system would attack him or her. In many cases, a baby does not even share his or her mother’s blood type.

Trending: Report: Search Site DuckDuckGo Hands User Data Over to Google

When the subject of abortion came up, I drew a line on the whiteboard with a vertical line at the right end followed by a circle. It looked something like this. The line represented 280 days of a woman’s pregnancy. The vertical line | represented the end-point of the pregnancy, and the O represented the born baby. I then asked, “Is it morally justified for a woman to kill her baby after he or she has been born — represented by the O to the right of the line |?”

take our poll - story continues below

Has There Been Voter Fraud in the 2020 Election?(2)

  • Has There Been Voter Fraud in the 2020 Election?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Godfather Politics updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.


No one said yes.

I then drew this line under it:


I asked, “How about while the baby was in the birth canal about to be born?” Again, no one said yes.

I then asked, “At what point on the line is it morally justified for a woman to abort her unborn baby?”


They immediately saw the problem and did not take the bait. So I drew several lines and asked, “What about here or here or here?”


To the right of the vertical line, it is NOT morally justified for a woman to kill her unborn baby, but to the left of the line, it is. If a person chooses any of the vertical lines, then I asked  this question:

“What is the difference between one second to the left of the line and one second to the right of the line?”

It seems someone had the same idea:

The grassroots organization Choice42, located in Canada, is dedicated to promoting the worth of both mother and baby. Their website offers a database of resources, including maternity homes and adoption agencies, as well as information on abortion recovery.

Truly, they are meeting women where they are and offering compassion and care.

A few days ago, Choice42 released this deliciously sardonic video entitled “The Magical Birth Canal.” It is a searing take on the pro-abort narrative that says life begins at birth.

Quite simply, it is brilliant.


Reposted with Permission from

Don't forget to Like Godfather Politics on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Godfather Politics email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

You Might Like
Previous Don't Support 'Gay Rights'? New Study says You're Ignorant
Next Food Network's Sandra Lee Argues that Christians should be 2nd Class Citizens

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon to the right of the comment, and report it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation. If you don't see a commenting section below, please disable your adblocker.